ChumpDumper
this is not a sig

This is who I want that seems to be in the general Spurs range as of right now.

:lmao

I dont really troll.

But doesn't the fact you loss in OT negates that run? As we know, this game is a game of making runs. Its all about holding on. I always get a little worried when Spurs have a lead bigger than 10 because I know at some point they'll choke it like no one's business.

Dude your trolling sucks.

How if I may ask?

Its because ESPN keeps going on about how they were down 2 games to the Clippers and won 4 straight and how Memphis was down to Thunder and won 4 straight. They're just following what ESPN is force feeding them.

Sympathy For Mr. Vengeance Started watching Park Chan Wook's vengeance trilogy last night. All 3 movies are on Netflix. I'm not going to grade the first one because I was left confused as hell about what went on. redzero you probably seen these films. Fill me in. lol I thought the younger...

That's how I missed the illuzion classic. Oh he's back btw. :lmao

:tu Only reason to have a twitter. lol

I can't understand for you. Sorry.

LMAO he came back! This guy is definitely mentally challenged.

:lmao This is great.

:cry Why doesn't ESPN like us? :cry

These three days of rest probably couldn't have come at a better time. The Spurs were all visibly gassed in the fourth and OT, especially Parker. Fortunately, so were the Grizzlies. I was watching the game with a friend who doesn't even watch any basketball, and even she commented that they all...

IIRC Malik Rose got a ring in 2005 even though he wasn't with the team anymore at the time of the title (as he was traded for Nazr Mohammad). But that was a slightly different circumstance than Jack's being waived due to behavior detrimental to the team. My bet, though, is that he would probably...

Well, it's an obvious adjustment as HH said (not staring them, but more minutes). However, this places a ton of pressure on that starting 5 to score all the points as they would now have absolutely 0 bench (meaning expectations, of course, someone could randomly go off). They would need 80...

Not sure I buy the "track the progress" line but whatever the case may be, let's hope he's as close to 100% as possible come Game 3. The fourth quarter was a harsh reminder of what these Spurs look like against the Grizzlies when TP is hobbled...

u mad

No goalpost was moved by me. It was pretty wasy to call that a flagrant foul. Period. You're the one trying to introduce multiple timelines into a simple foul call.

I would agree for the most part - however, even contested, those are makeable shots - at least more than they have been. Also, Spurs were getting hammered on the glass before Tim was in foul trouble and even in Golden State series rebounding issues surfaced.

But were all the other players committing that violation continue to be called at the same rate? That's what you have to prove if you are saying Yao was being treated differently from the other players. I can agree that bias may have been caused by the film, but a lot of information is missing.

No, referees do not make calls on alternate realities.

What he could have done makes no difference. Only what he did matters, and what he did easily qualifies as a flagrant foul.

By the usual people who have to rely on ad hominems. :tu

Except it was flagrant. Excessive contact is all that's required and the grab you so helpfully described fit the bill. Of course there is judgment involved, but there have clearly been enough similar flagrant calls in the history of that penalty to conclude this one could easily be called flagrant.

Eh, too subjective to buy into that much. I understand your point of view, but it could lead to as much bias as you claim exists in the NBA.

More than perceived intent, definitely.Parker rarely falls that way. You're exaggerating. The foul that was called last night is almost always considered flagrant 1. That's all. No need to lose your shit about it.

Just hope there is no tear.

I did, but hearing issues are a dog whistle for me, so to speak.