Reply With Quote
22mb/sec is only achiavable via USB drive
It was an inside job
The metadata in wikileaks emails shows the transfer rate which is physically impossible to achieve from Eastern Europe much less Russia or anywhere near it
–First, we used a 100 megabits-per-second (mbps) line to pull data from a one-gigabyte file to Amsterdam. The peak transfer speed was .8 MBps.
–Second, we used a commercial DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) to send the same one-gigabyte file to a commercial DSL in Amsterdam. The peak transfer speed was 1.8 MBps.
–Third, we pushed the same one-gigabyte file from a data center in New Jersey to a data center in the UK. The peak transfer speed was 12 MBps.
None of these attempts achieve anything close to the average rate of 22.7 megabytes per second evident in the July 5, 2016 download/copy associated with the DNC. In fact, this happens to be the speed typical of a transfer to a USB-2 external storage device. We do not think this pure coincidence; rather, it is additional evidence of a local download.
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/2...ate-narrative/
Time to put this hoax to rest for good
22mb/sec is only achiavable via USB drive
It was an inside job
What about all the other hacks?
Standard deflection from a sperm shielder.
Yeah put it to bed.
The metadata in wikileaks emails shows the transfer rate which is physically impossible to achieve from Eastern Europe much less Russia or anywhere near it
–First, we used a 100 megabits-per-second (mbps) line to pull data from a one-gigabyte file to Amsterdam. The peak transfer speed was .8 MBps.
–Second, we used a commercial DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) to send the same one-gigabyte file to a commercial DSL in Amsterdam. The peak transfer speed was 1.8 MBps.
–Third, we pushed the same one-gigabyte file from a data center in New Jersey to a data center in the UK. The peak transfer speed was 12 MBps.
None of these attempts achieve anything close to the average rate of 22.7 megabytes per second evident in the July 5, 2016 download/copy associated with the DNC. In fact, this happens to be the speed typical of a transfer to a USB-2 external storage device. We do not think this pure coincidence; rather, it is additional evidence of a local download.
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/2...ate-narrative/
Time to put this hoax to rest for good
Russia made no attempt to interfere with the election.
The mighty sleuth Hater just packaged the whole thing.
Next, find those 3 million illegal votes and prove Trump actually won the popular election.
I got this hang nail that won't go away...
Wikileaks trying to provide Russia with plausible deniability. You dont say.
This is about the wikileaks/ lery/DNC email leak that suppossedly flipped the election and is the cornerstone of the Russiagate conspiracy theory.
They tried to pin it on Russia by saying it was hacked by Russia proxys in Eastern Europe.
The metadata of the file, which is impossible to alter, shows the transfer rate of the fie was 22mb/sec. impossible that it was obtained remotely from anywhere but locally and most likely USB transfer.
So the conerstone of the Russiagate conspiracy is dead.
What about all the other hacks?
What other hacks?
Where is the analysis of their metadata?
Which hack?
All the other hacks not mentioned in your article.
Name a few
OK, so case not closed. Game on.
Thanks.
Seriously, what other hacks?
Holy -- you people really think July 5, 2016 was the only breach.
This is just ridiculous. The right's lack of basic curiosity about this subject is astounding.
Oh yeah, I forgot about Podesta handing over his Gmail password to a lame phishing attack.
Not the only one, but your blaming the victim is duly noted.
Keep going.
Why does the method matter?
If you leave your front door open is it a crime for someone to come steal your TV?
Are Trump supporters here really this ignorant?
There are Trump supporters, and then there's the anti-anti-Trumpers. The ones who claim they don't like Trump but spend 99% of their time concerned with Trump's critics instead of Trump himself. It's an odd choice given that only one of them is the President of the United States.
Do Leftists Brownshirters always have to stereotype en masse?
And there are people who say people shouldn't be bothered by alts and then ultra melt down when their alt is outed, but it shouldn't bother them if they believe others shouldn't be bothered by alts.
Still waiting for the list of "other hacks"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
