For posting that...this is my gift to you... welcome to the club my friend...
Eat up...and keep that good coming
For posting that...this is my gift to you... welcome to the club my friend...
Eat up...and keep that good coming
The pink triangle, rendered in hot pink and sometimes turned upright as a gay pride and gay rights symbol, was originally rendered in pink and used pointed downward on a Nazi concentration camp badge to denote sexual men.
You're ing weird.... and pink.
At least he takes the shot
Fact is you have to keep telling us something we already know, therefore acknowledging the fact that LeBron causes your cheeks to pucker.
Except your initial post was a statistical comparison, not merely a rings argument. And Jordan up to the age of 24 put up 35/6/7 playoff numbers to Kobe's 22/5/4 playoff numbers up to that age of 24.
Shaq doesn't come into play for comparing playoffs Kobe in 2008-2010 to playoffs Jordan at a more similar age from 1991-93. You compared playoff statistics of Kobe in his prime to playoff stats of Jordan when he was in his mid-30s, not in Jordan's true prime. It's a simple question you didn't seem to want to answer. I'll ask it again and wait for a direct answer to the question.
Why not compare 2008-10 Kobe to 1991-93 Jordan? Shaq doesn't enter the discussion for that comparison.
I'd give the ball to Fisher in the last 24 seconds.
His FG is probably twice Kobe's in the clutch.
I got a bad feeling something wrong is about to happen
Something worse than 4/25 FG ?
Perception can often be ruled by emotion. I don't know what their clutch stats are this season. But 82games have clutch statistics you can go to and find out how clutch Fisher is compared to Kobe. Now, it's not just shots in the last 24 seconds. I don't know where to find those. But these are the clutch shooting percentage stats of each from the previous 3 seasons according to 82games, final 5 minutes of the 4th quarter plus overtime, game within 5 points either way:
Kobe
2010-11: .402 FG%, .351 3P%, 87% FT
2009-10: .444 FG%, .357 3P%, 80% FT
2008-09: .457 FG%, .400 3P%, 92% FT
Fisher
2010-11: .313 FG%, .125 3P%, 66% FT
2009-10: .318 FG%, .286 3P%, 75% FT
2008-09: .250 FG%, .286 3P%, 78% FT
http://www.82games.com/1011/CSORT11.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0910/CSORT11.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0809/CSORT11.HTM
Now, Fisher might have a better percentage in the final 24 seconds because he has taken and made big shots, generally wide open jumpers. It's just weird how feelings about Kobe will warp the perception of reality. So people will believe what they want to believe.
If that's not your typical Robin then i don't know about Batman.
so when it's convenient you parse out les and stats? Lkr fans balance comes in that he compares stats relative to les minus Shaq...asian please gtfoh...Kobe was almost double the same amount of time put in at the same age...because at 28 MJ had 7 yrs while at 28 Kobe had 12 yrs almost double...you not trying to compare primes because Kobe's came during the Shaq yrs and ironically it's the same reason his stats are lower than MJ's prior to MJ winning les why because of the Shaq factor...listen Jammy you try but when you step to my true Laker brothers with that BS - a like Kool will all over you...now go run and tell Kori that
Shaq has nothing to do with 2008-10 Kobe and 1991-93 Jordan. I asked a simple question. It wasn't answered. Why not compare prime Kobe to prime Jordan? Why only compare prime Kobe to mid-30s Jordan? Simple question. Not answered. Shaq has nothing to do with the question.
Fact is if you compare 2008-10 Kobe to 1991-93 Jordan, it would be very clear that Kobe is not Jordan's peer. Now Kobe might be closer to Jordan than anyone else since Jordan. But that doesn't mean they're on the same level. Ignoring 1991-93 Jordan manipulates the facts.
kobe & lebald both overhyped neither is nearly close to jordan tbh.
Wtf kind of response is yours. I just told you don't spin it Jammie..
A prime Kobe is 22-26 the Shaq yrs so you can't make the comparison without Shaq. Kobe at 28 is past prime...WHY? Because he already had almost 14 yrs in at 28...12 to be exact while MJ only had 8 yrs in at 28..so you trying to make 28 Kobes prime is silly as ...dude listen i may be a hardcore but I'm smarter than you.
Do you honestly want to argue that Kobe has been past his prime for the last 5-6 seasons?
Fitting into the robin role nicely.
If you need to lock up your women because she might some dude, then she's a hoe.
Some contending team needs to trade for Travis Outlaw
Yes. I know the seems super human compared to tosb but any player that is 28 is past prime. You tried to clown my Laker brother and I caught you with a left hook...deal with that .
28 = past their prime???
Lost the argument right there.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)