yeah because you're a "male" feminist binary re .
We do. We put the murderers in prison, not their guns.
Preventative measures often target tools and the people who use them. We regulate the out of cars for safety. You can be sure that if there was a specific vehicle that mass murderers tended to favor because of how easy it makes it to kill people, that vehicle would be banned.
33 dead - 130 injured in Stabbing Spree: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/3...g-spree-n41966
84 dead by Vehicle running Through crowd:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...fore/87109200/
If someone is set on killing, they'll find a way.
You're assuming the numbers would be equal with an ar15
Remember when that guy killed all those people at the concert by throwing cars from that hotel?
An AR can cause that much damage from 3/4 of a mile away. Its much harder to control the death rate.
so discredit those 2 events because the narrative doesn't fit the agenda?
is that real ?
But Tylenol
an issue you want no part of.... how about bigPharma? why blame the gun when all incidents have been proven to include psychoactive drugs?
All of the murders below were performed by a vehicle with four or more wheels. There was no push to mandate personal travel be done on motorcycles and ban all cars and trucks. (As a rider, I'd love this )
http://abcnews.go.com/US/car-hits-cr...ry?id=49179590
https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/28/us/oh...ctive-shooter/
https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/23/europ...ttack-victims/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/europ...arms-incident/
I realize they happened and its true that you can kill anyone with just about anything including your bare hands. But, still an AR is meant for really one thing only. Kill mass numbers of anything.
I just think its a good solution to one very big problem we are having right now with mass shootings. Again, just my opinion and take on this matter.
Then you're cool with guns' being subject to the same licensing, training, insurance and registration required for the sale and use of cars, right?
i pretty much agree. i like guns but see no purpose for AR but then again just because i can't find a purpose doesn't mean they should be banned. i can't find a purpose for reality tv and yet it's been on for 20+ yrs.
still dont get this nonsensical point you try to make
It's just as easy to kill people from 400 yards away by throwing cars at them.
And Tylenol.
nobody is disputing that a car is used different than a gun in an attempt to kill people.
Nor could they -- but it's all the same to them, apparently.
Semi-automatic is much more specific than "four or more wheels."
There's no strong push to ban guns with "one or more barrels."
100% yes...
In Texas a driver's license isn't required to buy a car or operate it on personal property or a closed course (race track). Driving on public roads requires license, insurance, and registration. Failure to comply is Class C misdemeanor and $200 fine.
I'd be happy with the same for guns: no license required to purchase or discharge on private property or gun range. Class C misdemeanor for discharging in public without proper license, insurance, and registration.
le and transfer records?
Everyone just leaves their guns at home?
le and transfer records for cars? If purchased from an individual, or out of state, it is the purchasers responsibility to register if they are operating on public roads. Again, it's only illegal to operate a car on public roads without a license/insurance/registration; if it's not licensed/insured/registered it is perfectly legal to transport it on a trailer to a ranch or race track.
People would still be able to transport/carry guns...just if they wanted to use it for self defense in public, the gun would need to be registered and the user licensed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)