Putin good now.
Pick a lane, Chris.
HRC remains relevant no matter how many times you ding it. I can see the 'sweep it under the rug' thingy hit home.
Never said Putin was good. Ex-KGB imperialist. You clearly didn't get the joke.
you hear that, dale?
tick tock
Damn. Seems like this sounds familiar. Maybe like I have mentioned this a few times.
You post 5 tweets of the same story of course you’ve mentioned it a few times.
Also...”Mitc told McClatchy in an email that any suggestion she has concerns about the NRA's Russia connections is a "complete fabrication."
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...#storylink=cpy
FBI lied to the FISA court on 4 separate occasions. ✔️
Comey was warned about potential abuse in 2014 ✔️
DOJ refuses to release budget for Mueller's investigation ✔️
McCabe likely to be fired and charged ✔️
Jeff Sessions didn't need to recuse himself. Cited the wrong law. Likely snookered by Obama DOJ holdovers. ✔️
2nd special counsel to be announced soon ✔️
IG report coming soon but requires 2nd special counsel for prosecutorial power ✔️
lol mcclatchy lol djohn ✔️
crofl the chief lawyer of the US government getting duped by staffers on a matter of law
Mueller May be Forced to Indict Trump
Many politicians and pundits are opining that the public may never know the truth about possible wrongdoings by now-President Donald Trump until they read Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s report, but most don’t realize how unlikely the public release of any such report is.
Mueller is bound by current Justice Department [DoJ] regulations which make any release – much less a release to the public – of any such report very unlikely.
So Mueller may have to obtain an indictment against Trump, and include the details of Trump’s alleged wrongdoing in the text of the indictment, for this information to become public.
an indictment may be the only way for Mueller to ensure that the information sees the light of day.
But Starr was able to do this because he had been appointed independent counsel under a statute which not only permitted but required that he submit to Congress a report if he found any “evidence which might warrant impeachment”;
a very broad and vaguely defined category of offenses which might not even cons ute crimes, much less crimes which could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
The special statute under which Starr had been appointed has long since expired, and
Mueller was appointed special counsel by Rosenstein under DoJ regulations which also bind him as special counsel.
These DoJ regulations do not require or even permit a public report from Mueller.
Instead, they make it very difficult for any such findings to become public.
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/muel...-indict-trump/
Nice work, Rosenstein.
U.S. sanctions Russians for meddling, but not Putin's oligarchs
The United States slapped sanctions on Russian individuals and en ies for U.S. election meddling and cyber attacks
but put off targeting oligarchs and government officials close to President Vladimir Putin,
prompting lawmakers in both parties to say President Donald Trump needs to do much more.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...litics+News%29
Trash is so 100% compromised, a wonderful "Russian asset"
Yeah your boy is going to prison. Deal with itYou post 5 tweets of the same story of course you’ve mentioned it a few times.
Also...”Mitc told McClatchy in an email that any suggestion she has concerns about the NRA's Russia connections is a "complete fabrication."
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...#storylink=cpy
Want to bet another $500 on that?
McMaster gone, likely. If true, he's the second high profile Admin official gone shortly after criticizing Russia.
Either they knew they were out and felt free to speak openly, or they were canned for speaking openly. Either way, pretty terrible optics.
Unread news, by Chris, before he posted it.
National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster responds to the Washington Post report that President Trump revealed classified information to Russians.
may 2017
amazing that mcmaster knew back in may 2017 to deny a story that was written in march 2018.
first actual evidence of 5D chess
Still fake news.
Even more amazing that he had the foresight to use this cypher, which would be revealed the next year to mean "I am not being removed by President Trump."
I have a brief statement for the record. There is nothing that the president takes more seriously than the security of the American people. The story that came out tonight as reported is false. The president and the foreign minister reviewed a range of common threats to our two countries, including threats to civil aviation.
At no time, at no time, where intelligent sources or methods discussed. And the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known. Two other senior officials who were present, including the Secretary of the State, remember the meeting the same way and have said so. Their on the record accounts should outweigh anonymous sources. I was in the room. It didn't happen.
The report isn't that he was fired. lol huckabee
C-A-S-E D-I-S-M-I-S-S-E-D
lol editing your post after I quoted it. Slick Willy style
McMaster gone. Second high profile Admin official gone shortly after criticizing Russia.
Either they knew they were out and felt free to speak openly, or they were canned for speaking openly. Either way, pretty terrible optics.McMaster gone, likely. If true, he's the second high profile Admin official gone shortly after criticizing Russia.
Either they knew they were out and felt free to speak openly, or they were canned for speaking openly. Either way, pretty terrible optics.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote