Reply With Quote
Neither are dead.
I already explained twice how the investigation started.
You went all in on anonymous bull .
Just like pizzagate.
lol
Neither are dead.
I already explained twice how the investigation started.
You went all in on anonymous bull .
Just like pizzagate.
lol
Republican Sen. Marco Rubio said he sees "no evidence" to support President Trump's claims that the FBI used an informant to gather information on his campaign, but that instead the federal probe was focused on "individuals with a history of links to Russia that were concerning."
"What I have seen is evidence that they were investigating individuals with a history of links to Russia that were concerning," Rubio, a Florida senator who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee told ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent and "This Week" Co-Anchor Martha Raddatz on Sunday
PeeSA
Heard from Nunes about det meeting, TSA?
lol
so? since when does Congress "oversee" DoJ criminal investigations?
No. What he said is that the FBI does not comment on ongoing investigations. It's their "policy."
You already explained twice how it started? All I recall is you spamming that article Papadapolous got drunk and blabbed to Downer who then notified the US. Is that not the story you are sticking with now? What is your new story on how it started?
What criminal investigation are you even talking about?
the multiple crimes that Mueller's bulldozer is pursuing.
and you didn't answer my "Congress oversees DoJ investigations" question, criminal or otherwise.
I didn't answer your question about criminal investigations because Comey wasn't conducting a criminal investigation and was conducting a counterintelligence investigation.
===========
Stefanik: My first set of questions are directed at Director Comey. Broadly, when the FBI has any open counterintelligence investigation, what are the typical protocols or procedures for notifying the DNI, the White House, and senior congressional leadership?
Comey: There is a practice of a quarterly briefing on sensitive cases to the Chair and Ranking of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. The reason I hesitate is, thanks to feedback we’ve gotten, we’re trying to make it better. And that involves a briefing briefing the Department of Justice, I believe the DNI, and the — some portion of the National Security Council at the White House. We brief them before Congress is briefed.
Stefanik: So it’s quarterly for all three, then, senior congressional leadership, the White House, and the DNI?
Comey: I think that’s right. Now that’s by practice, not by rule or by written policy. Which is why, thanks to the Chair and Ranking giving us feedback, we’re trying to tweak it in certain ways.
Stefanik: So since in your opening statement you confirmed that there is a counterintelligence investigation currently open and you also referenced that it started in July, when did you notify the DNI, the White House, or senior Congressional leadership?
Comey: Congressional leadership, sometime recently — they were briefed on the nature of the investigation and some details, as I said. Obviously the Department of Justice must have been aware of it all along. The DNI … I don’t know what the DNI’s knowledge of it was, because we didn’t have a DNI until Mr. Coats took office and I briefed him his first morning in office.
Stefanik: So just to drill down on this, if the open investigation began in July, and the briefing of Congressional leadership only occurred recently, why was there no notification prior to the recent — the past month.
Comey: I think our decision was it was a matter of such sensitivity that we wouldn’t include it in the quarterly briefings.
Stefanik: So when you state “our decision,” is that your decision, is it usually your decision what gets briefed in those quarterly updates?
Comey: No. It’s usually the decision of the head of our counterintelligence division.
Stefanik: And just again, to get the details on the record, why was the decision not to brief senior congressional leadership until recently, when the investigation had been open since July, a very serious investigation. Why was that decision made to wait months?
Comey: Because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Nope. I never said it started with Papadopoulos.
You have big problems, TSA.
Gowdy gotcha good.
lol
Oh so now Comey good again.
You were spamming the drunk Papadapolous article when the Steele dossier started to fall apart. If that is not the story you are saying started it what is your new story on how it started?
lol PeeSA
TSA. When did the dossier fall apart?
It is not a new story, TSA.
I posted it twice. It's an article from January 2017.
Two articles actually.
Not Vachel Rex, so there's no way you would believe it.
Post it a third time and provide the date you first posted it.
Since when, and from where, does Congress obtain the authority to oversee (which could mean influence, guide, etc) DoJ investigations, of any nature, esp those leading crimes?
Look at you and your cute little demands.
You didn't care the first two times. That's on you. You're too busy kneeling at conspiracy glory holes.
You're never going to come out of your anonymous conspiracy bubble. Gowdy finished you off. He's seen everything you have demanded and said the FBI did what they should have done. You can't change that. Vachel Rex and fake Huber can't change that.
I guess you're going to move the golaposts to the final IG report, but det first report was exactly the massive disappointment for you I said it would be.
here, TSA, don't blow a gasket. pretty sure these are the articles he's referring to
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/u...tion.html?_r=0
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...127231799.html
lol I hadn't even seen the Times article.
Thanks!
Here's the other one I was talking about:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38589427
The big question is this TSA: How have you not heard of any of this?
Seems like your anonymous twitter overlords neglected you.
See if you can find their spin on these stories.
yes you had
"lol Louise Mensch"
IIRC that was the day the Papadopoulos story dropped?
I don't know why you keep bringing up Gowdy as neither he nor Nunes saw the do ents they requested.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
