You're ing ting me. Cleveland gets good trades even though they're way over the tax threshold, Spurs don't do any trades. What are you doing, Bud? How about helping the Spurs out?
I'm not a cap guy at all. But aren't the Cavs maxed out? Which means unless they have a TE, they need to send equal salary to Atlanta, not just picks. Wonder who the Cavs are shedding? And who at that level would Bud want?
You're ing ting me. Cleveland gets good trades even though they're way over the tax threshold, Spurs don't do any trades. What are you doing, Bud? How about helping the Spurs out?
Good for the Cavs.
Will be a nice fit around Kyrie and LeBron.
Maybe MCRae? Dunleavy?
ok. Thanks. Not sure this improves the Hawks any. They must be getting picks. or was Korver about to be a FA?
Cedi Osman If I had to guess.
Pop used to love the out of Jarrett Jack back in the day.
I never heard that one.
Well now you have.
I wouldn't be shocked if Bud never answers a call from RC Buford again. Splitter was damaged goods and the Spurs knew it.
wonder what jr smith will do he could cause issues
Jack was just one of those chuckers who used to kill the Spurs & Pop couldn't say anything but kiss his ass.
ing Chalmers. Gets caught on Rookie Weekend with weed and hookers in the hotel room, while the rest of the rookies are downstairs getting their mandatory lecture about how to stay out of trouble.
Brain surgeon.
Bud and Larry Bird should never take RC's calls again.
Jack would have been a perfect backup point on a good team but started getting paid as a starter"
This team could use another wing defender.
Rather have PJ Tucker as an option instead of Kyle in a series against HOU or GS tbh.. 5th wing behind Kawhi/Green/Manu/Simmons.
I'd rather have Kyle and Tucker if it's coming down to defense. Having a dynamic shooter off the bench would be better.
Tucker has been a 35% 3 point shooter for his career. Much better option than Kyle overall. IMO.
I'd rather not have another defensive liability on the floor. Three and D type is what they need and Tucker fits that even though he's on the downside of his career. Casspi fits the shoe too, even though he's not as solid of a defender, but I think he has the athletic versatility and length to be good enough on D. By athletic versatility I'm not saying he's a great athlete, just that he has some mobility and flex ( he's not a stiff like Novak).
The buyout watch thread should be renamed the dream big thread.
Kyle's a better defender than PJ. So if it's coming down to D, I'd rather have him. As I was just saying, for the last spot, I'd much rather have a shooter, preferably at the guard spot. Someone better than Forbes, obviously.
Stats back up Kyle is the better defender, but PJ is the better overall play since he provides 3&D. Just my opinion.
It is a pointless discussion about Kyle here bc the Spurs have a roster spot and don't need to waive anyone to pick up a FA.
About Forbes, there's absolutely no cir stance under which I would see him in a playoff scenario even with injuries. So far, he looks like a Pop project to replace Mills shooting production if they are unable or unwilling to resign him next season. He's more in danger of getting cut as he's no playing at all and it is really a stretch to consider him a wing. They could pick someone else up for that designated shooter role that Forbes is supposed to be. And still it's unnecessary to waive anyone per se.
Not a pointless discussion since they can only dress 13 players in the post-season.
Kyle could easly be releagated to inactive if a guy like tucker comes in.
I suppose but the same was supposed to happen with K. Martin last season and didn't. Until you get the guy in the team you don't know how he will pan out with Pop...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)