Like always, you miss the point. It still increases the odds of being a burglary statistic.
you ever heard of a gun safe?
Like always, you miss the point. It still increases the odds of being a burglary statistic.
but you always say the bad guys will always get guns anyway.
pick a lane.
Are you seriously that daft?
Why should I pick one lane when there are several, and this adds one...
Bye ClamBoy.
i know you're more inclined to think that way, flaglot.
what's the minimum age you think a kid should have a gun?
hmmm. I started shooting (under strict parental supervision) at 6. I started hunting by myself at 9.
That's pretty close to when I started shooting too. Got my first cut down .410 around 6 or 7.
Here's your nine year old gun fellator, .
But, I wasn't whipping it out and shooting down siblings either.
Yeah, me either.
Huh. I guess we don't all agree.
Who here disagrees that a five year old should not be left alone with a loaded gun in the room?
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
What part of shall not be infringed do you not understand, you ing statist?
did you not notice how everyone ignored this the first time you posted it? Try again, third time's a charm.
I'm not gonna let you wipe your ass with the cons ution and neither is the NRA. Guns for anyone, no limits. It enshrined in the precious do ent.
I don't think anyone does. It appears the problem was, he was unsupervised and had access to it like a toy. There are so many things you do not let a young kid have access to unsupervised. A gun is just one of several potentially dangerous things.
The pusher must be on an overdose of the drugs he peddles.
Are okay with your five year old watching pornography?
This incident has everything to do with terrible parenting. The background check failing has some here so but thirst they'll use this dead child to push their agenda. Typical butthurt liberal method.
is a rocket launcher an arm?
Pornograhy is not a right that was enshrined in our sacred cons ution you statist.
This statist probably thinks the existing federal law requiring background checks is cons utional.
The first amendment most definitely is, and I saw no age limit on that either.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)