Necessary!
I need a video. it's possible that the picture is photoshopped, or that she was spraying the officers with dangerous chemical from a nozzle located on her face, or that she had information about possible terror plots that required enhanced techniques to be used by the officer.
Between 1980 and 2005, 80% of all new income created in this country went to the top 1%.
WC is just a plain idiot.
I'm pretty sure that's water. Occam's razor. She was just thirsty.
TBH, who hasn't wanted to do this to their nagging wife at some point in time.Open wide
Hey officer, I'm thirsty.
Lemme spray you with my seltzer bottle.
Thanks!
cry, in a place where no one will notice. I.e. Their mind
link. I don't really understand what that means exactly (new income) and how that was created.
The top 1% pays more taxes than the bottom 95%
http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/24944.html
Pretty big words coming from a braindead idiot.
Got smacked down so many times in this forum that he has to resort to trolling.
I don't care you you see it. You're just another person here who acts like the first grade bullies in grade school.
Got smacked down so many times in this forum that he has to resort to trolling.
And like a first grader, you are presented with statistically valid evidence and respond with, "NUH UH. I'M RIGHT. LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU." Then you move goalposts or change topics.
Now, much like someone in grade school, you resort to petty comments and general misanthropy, as if someone took your favorite toy away from you. And now you've fully arrived, one step away from "yo momma" jokes.
Maybe if even 50% of what you spout on this forum had ANY basis in reality, people who bludgeon you with logic and fundamentally sound premises wouldn't seem like such bullies. Such as it is, though. Poor baby. His feelings have been hurt cause his arguments rarely (if ever) hold water.
"they ran out in front of the bullets"
Eeesh. Talk about not realizing how it all fits together.
New income means income gains in the aggregate.
$1Tr income in year 1
$1.1Tr income in year 2
New income = 1.1 - 1 = $0.1tr
The funny thing about your little sniglet is that if you hold tax rates steady, and the only people who see gains in their income are the 1% or .1%, then over time they will proportionally pay more and more income taxes.
Since tax rates have been flat or even falling, then your own link proves the statement regarding who has been making most of the gains in income.
This is why using violence on non-violent protesters doesn't work...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...a011220S80.DTL
Are the police just keep going to pepper spray them? Then they'll come back again, in greater and greater numbers.Students have again put up tents near the site where University of California, Davis police used pepper spray on seated protesters in a conflict that has sparked outrage and calls for the school chancellor's resignation.
WC, I think you forgot to answer this question.
The goons need to up their weapons to tasers, kill a few at-risk protesters. Pepper spray is for pussies.
The Taser mfr swears tasers are non-lethal, and that's why 500+ tasered victims have died.
Why do you guys still engage WC? I can't think of a single time he's had a rational thought on pretty much any subject. Asking him questions and then expecting anything other than a ridiculous answer is, well, ridiculous.
Why is this surprising? Who creates "new income"?
Fox News Host Dismisses Pepper Spray Attack By Cops: ‘It’s A Food Product, Essentially’
While Kelly suggests the pepper spray was somehow diluted, Lt. John Pike actually sprayed the sitting students in the face with military-grade pepper spray three times.
http://thinkprogress.org/special/201...product-right/
While I think the pepper spraying at UC Davis was excessive, it is not the Kent State incident that some on the left have been pining for.
Even a blind squirrel sometimes gets the nut.
WC has had ( I should say: I have seen him have) lucid moments. Not commonly, but not never IMHO.
Not them apparently. In order for it to 'trickle down' they have to not keep it. Plus thats a figure of individual and not firms. They paid themselves.
You really are still trying to sell supply side?
You clearly failed to stir up any passion from your own considerable reserves of fake outrage, instead mouthing the word excessive, as you drove by.
Impressive.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
