Reply With Quote
He's been broke for 3 years now:
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...ossibly-doomed
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/kim-do...ne-ck-p-179008
His bank accounts have been frozen, and he owes a few million bucks to his lawyers...
Yeah but you believed kids were raped in the basement at Comet Ping Pong.
He's been broke for 3 years now:
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...ossibly-doomed
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/kim-do...ne-ck-p-179008
His bank accounts have been frozen, and he owes a few million bucks to his lawyers...
Don't be disingenuous
you'd better hope this is just a perfectly thought out LARP.
4channity!
Figured you groupies would enjoy it.
It is worth the read though, seriously
As advertisers begin to flee, Hannity brags about his smears of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich
Hannity brags that Fox News exercises no editorial control: “They leave me alone”
Fox News host Sean Hannity bragged about his continued promotion of a baseless Seth Rich murder conspiracy and fringe-sourced smear, even as advertisers began to announce they would no longer be advertising on his Fox News show.
In an interview with HuffPost, Hannity said “he received no pressure from Fox News brass or Rupert Murdoch … to back off the story,” which Hannity has continued to promote even “after Fox News’ website retracted a story featuring unproven claims of a link between Rich and WikiLeaks.”
Instead, Hannity argued “There’s nothing that I did, nothing that I said, except they don’t like my position politically,” in reference to criticism of his ghoulish obsession with Rich.
Hannity’s refusal to back down comes as advertisers are realizing that his history of bigotry, sexism, and penchant for spreading conspiracy theories might be too risky for their brands.
As reported by Buzzfeed, multiple advertisers are dumping his show.
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...rica+-+Blog%29
No, it isn't.Figured you groupies would enjoy it.
It is worth the read though, seriously
No. It's not. That's the point.
4chan ever being worth reading.
How can you possibly come to that conclusion if you don't read it?
Have you ever wondered how Wikileaks receives the massive size files they do?
Or, you know, maybe the guy who's been convicted of fraud and embezzlement is just full of and it's not a vast conspiracy.
Sean Hannity is running the campaign against Sean Hannity
Put simply: Sean Hannity is running the advertiser campaign against Sean Hannity.
That multiple advertisers have dropped from Hannity proves the point we’ve been making all along: that organizing a pressure campaign wasn’t even necessary at this juncture, because Hannity is so volatile that major brands would likely be uncomfortable associating with him.
In the past few days, Hannity has put that volatility on full display with wild and reckless conspiracies and by antagonizing his employer Fox News.
Sure enough and as predicted, companies started pulling their ads from Hannity because they know his volatility is bad for business.
Tonight, Hannity further illustrated the pitfalls of his volatility by starting to actively encourage his fans to pressure his own advertisers.
This is only going to send them running from him even faster.”
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...rica+-+Blog%29
I will admit to just reading up on Dotcom in the last few days so I've got some catching up to do but please do share your knowledge on his convictions.
Right on cue the Share Blue shill postsSean Hannity is running the campaign against Sean Hannity
Put simply: Sean Hannity is running the advertiser campaign against Sean Hannity.
That multiple advertisers have dropped from Hannity proves the point we’ve been making all along: that organizing a pressure campaign wasn’t even necessary at this juncture, because Hannity is so volatile that major brands would likely be uncomfortable associating with him.
In the past few days, Hannity has put that volatility on full display with wild and reckless conspiracies and by antagonizing his employer Fox News.
Sure enough and as predicted, companies started pulling their ads from Hannity because they know his volatility is bad for business.
Tonight, Hannity further illustrated the pitfalls of his volatility by starting to actively encourage his fans to pressure his own advertisers.
This is only going to send them running from him even faster.”
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/20...rica+-+Blog%29
yes because if somebody has only learned of his fraud and embezzlement convictions recently, then that makes them less serious offenses
wtf have you been playing the Hannity drinking game???
Fraud:
Embezzlement:In 1994, he was arrested by German police for trafficking in stolen phone calling card numbers. He was held in custody for a month, released and arrested again on additional hacking charges shortly afterwards. He was eventually convicted of 11 counts of computer fraud, 10 counts of data espionage, and an assortment of other charges.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Do...investigationsSchmitz moved to Thailand to avoid investigation where he was subsequently arrested on behalf of German authorities. In response, he allegedly pretended to kill himself online, posting a message on his website that from now on he wished to be known as "His Royal Highness King Kimble the First, Ruler of the Kimpire". He was deported back to Germany where he pleaded guilty to embezzlement in November 2003 and, after five months in jail awaiting trial, again received a suspended sentence, this time of 20 months. After avoiding a prison sentence for a second time, he left Germany and moved to Hong Kong in late 2003.
Basically, his word means nothing.
If I wanted to post bull LARP's to troll I'd go with shockers like this
But I'm not here to troll. I really do think Dotcom was used as the middleman for Wikileaks.
Last edited by TSA; 05-24-2017 at 10:37 PM.
Agreed. He is either provides the evidence or fades away into obscurity.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
