Filibustering for 15 hours to virtue signal
Done deal
Suck it up, snowflakes.
Filibustering for 15 hours to virtue signal
Gorsuch Justice. Not Garland.
sad thread. 55 year olds trolling like kids
We Already Know "Who He Is"
These Four Cases Will Quickly Show Who Gorsuch Really Is
Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission:
Salazar-Limon v Houston
Alaska Oil and Gas Association v. Zinke:
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/04/gorsuchs-impact-likely-be-immediate
anti-LGBTQ
anti-govt
pro-police
pro-Christian Sharia
Yeah, complete with parroting all of the same alt-right phrases. Like an intellectually challenged attack of the clones. No wonder the Russians say they can replace their human run pepe Twitter accounts with bots soon
Steve Bannon Wants to Destroy the "Administrative State." Neil Gorsuch Could Be the Key.
The Supreme Court nominee wants to throw out the precedent underpinning federal administrative law.
"the deconstruction of the administrative state"—in other words, the evisceration of decades' worth of rules and regulations and the agencies that enforce them.
"Judge Gorsuch's record points strongly in the direction of Bannon's ominous phrase, toward weakening the ability of agencies to protect our air and water, as well as worker safety and compensation,"
As a federal judge on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, Gorsuch has advocated tossing out the primary Supreme Court precedent underpinning federal administrative law.
Known as "Chevron deference," after the high court's 1984 unanimous ruling in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, it holds that the courts should defer to federal agencies when it comes to the rules these departments design and implement based on congressional legislation (which sometimes hands the crafting of the nitty-gritty policy details to the government experts).
Chevron deference, for instance, allows the Environmental Protection Agency to have scientists help make rules for enforcing the Clean Air Act, and it permits those regulations to be modified in response to new technology or new threats to the environment.
Gorsuch planted his flag firmly against Chevron in August, when he authored the majority opinion in a case called Gutierrez-Brizuela v. Lynch.
In a highly unusual move, he wrote a lengthy concurrence to his own opinion, laying out his arguments for overturning Chevron and reining in the power of executive agencies.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...vron-deference
VRWC, their Repug s, stooges in legislature and SCOTUS, ing America into un ability.
If Boukaki hates it I can be assured it's good for the USA.
er beat me to it.
Cite the cases for which you agree with Gorsuch's ruling.
You're all celebrating. Back it up. Why is he a good pick? Other than the fact that Sean Hannity and the Heritage Foundation approve...
Not speaking for anyone else, but I like Gorsuch because he uses the Cons ution to interpret and adjudicate the law and he does so without partisanship bias which is well do ented.
Next time a seat comes up republicans gonna be salty as
It is done - a major campaign promise fulfilled. Hopefully this SC justice doesn't turn himself into a pretzel (twice) when interpreting Obamacare.
Repug Gorsuch ( LIE: "judges aren't Dem or Repug" ) will vote 5-4 100% of the time, and EVERY sector of society and the environment will BE ED, except the 1%/BigCorp/Christian-Taliban.
He's a VRWC extreme right wing extremist, just like the other 4 VRWC assholes.
Authoritarian, facsist VRWC/Repugs ing, destroying America into un ability.
your response is a soundbite and a youtube. Such veracity!
youre so desperate for something positive that youre calling the appointment of a sc justice a "major campaign promise."
did you just wake up from a 300 year coma?
Many conservatives and evangelicals turned out for Trump just for this. Hopefully at least a 30 year service and Kennedy retires this summer to be replaced by another 40 something conservative.
what conservative forum post did you copy/paste this reply from?
"Gorsuch because he uses the Cons ution to interpret and adjudicate" ... whatever the 1%/VRWC/BigCorp hired him to do.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-08-2017 at 01:29 PM.
Mitch McConnell, the man who broke America
“No majority leader wants written on his tombstone that he presided over the end of the Senate,” the minority leader said.
He continued: “Breaking the rules to change the rules is un-American. I just hope the majority leader thinks about his legacy, the future of his party, and, most importantly, the future of our country before he acts.”
they were uttered in 2013, by then-Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), when Democrats pushed through a similar filibuster change for lesser nominations.
That McConnell did a 180 on the topic — going from the ins utional defender of the filibuster to the man who destroyed it — is unsurprising. He has frequently shifted his views to suit the needs of the moment. But in this case McConnell was correct in 2013, and what he just did this week was even more ruinous than what he accused the Democrats of doing then.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...t-draw7&wpmm=1
The entire Repug party, all levels, and their voters, supporters are destructive bags.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-08-2017 at 01:02 PM.
Perhaps you meant "inevitability" instead of "campaign promise."
yep, abortion will be made illegal again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)