There are assholes on this forum who couldnt hit an 80 mph fastball. It's all about hand eye coordination and bat speed. And fielding the baseball isnt easy.
I wouldnt say boring bit its slow.
That is why Vin Scully is so amazing ...his storytelling and wit without trying to hard helps make a 2-1 game feel epic.
I also enjoy sovcer hated ut as a kid ...except plsying ...but the nuance and skill it takes should be appreciated same as with baseball i dont nornally watch fullgames matches etc of any sport except hoops and american football though but soccer is probably third ...on amount of time i spend watching over nhl and mlb
Oh forgot bixing ill watch all 12 rounds of a good fight too
There are assholes on this forum who couldnt hit an 80 mph fastball. It's all about hand eye coordination and bat speed. And fielding the baseball isnt easy.
Not gonna lie, went into that article thinking okay . . .I'm sure there are some arguments because McHale did have aspects of his game that were better. But he's just doing a lot of cherry picking (while omitting tons of Duncan stuff) and throwing in lots of random bashes for no reason. It's like a big forum post lol. Lies too, claims less rebounds were available to get in the 80's as opposed to Duncan's teams. . .when Duncan typically played on a low pace team of maybe 90 which means less misses since less shots, meanwhile Celtics pace was 100+. . .so more shots, more misses, more rebounds.
Duncan TRB%: 18.4%, McHale: 13.2%. DRB%: 26.5% vs 16.9% lol. "Less rebounds to get". . ..
"I conservatively estimate that McHale's Celtics would have won no less than 8 NBA championships and been to the Finals 10 times in 13 years in today's NBA~"
Terrible homer article imo. Bad use of stats and tries to twist facts with lies and opinion.
Holy that box jump! wow
This.
Homer be Homerin'...
Duncan being on that team from 1981 to 1999 changes a lot of basketball history, tbh.
their "calculations" for ronaldos time included bringing in usian bolt's time into their formula... its flat re ed
Hamilton isn't making the all-star team any time soon b/c he doesn't have skills to go along with his speed.
Dee Gordon was caught for being on the Ben Johnson regimen:
GOAT Besibol player:On April 29, 2016, Major League Baseball suspended Gordon for 80 games due to performance-enhancing drugs use. He tested positive for exogenous testosterone and clostebol.[2]
Zone defense was illegal pre-2004 so teams couldn't double post players before they catch the ball which is why the most dominant seasons by post players was pre-2004.
Come up with your own then.
Why are you so skeptical that Ronaldo's projected 40 time is in that range? It looks good to me.
Another example. Billy Hamilton holds the in game record for the fastest time from home to first at 3.3 seconds. As you know, that distance is 90 feet. Ronaldo ran the 25m (82 feet) sprint in 3.61 seconds.
Hamilton was never a football player, but he estimates he could run the 40 in around 4.3.
All we can do is estimate, but by all accounts, the 4.64-4.7 projection for Ronaldo looks reasonable.
We're talking about athleticism not skills. And Hamilton would scorch every floptrot player in the world in a foot race.
And he might not even be the fastest MLB player.
Referencing players from the 20's before integration.
You can do better.
Willie Mays is the GOAT, though.
if course it looks good to you. it feeds into confirmation bias
Though difficult to forget him wandering around in center field for the Mets. Lord.
Then prove otherwise, Philo.
Try and logically argue that naldo would have a faster 40 time than that?
Here's how split times in the 40 yard typically go for sprinters in the NFL:
Athlete 1
10 yd - 1.59
10-20 - 1.06
20-40 -- 1.94
40 yd - 4.59
Athlete 2
10 yd - 1.70
10-20 - 1.05
20-40 -- 1.95
40 yd - 4.70
http://www.strengthcoach.com/public/1744.cfm
Let's give naldo the 20 yard split time in the first example of 1.94 (.97 seconds per ten yard split). Adding that ten yard split to his 25m (27 yard) time of 3.61 seconds, we get 4.58 seconds. And there's still 3 yards to go. 3 yards is 30% of 10 yards, .97 x .30 = .291 seconds. 4.58 + .291 = 4.871 seconds.
LOOKS ING GOOD. If anything, the blog I initially listed was probably being kind.
I await some Philo'ing. Be better if you just dealt with the fact that your soccer hero isn't really all that fast.
That fact alone would make him comparable.
There used to be an awesome McHale vs. Olajuwon 86 Finals vid on YT. I don't know what happened to it; but it was awesome.
im not a povertyball fan at all ... equally boring to watch as beisbol. i'm just not buying that prince fielder runs faster than ronaldo
Ah, killshot time. Finally found a breakdown of 10 meter splits.
40 yards = 36.6 meters.
Let's give naldo Bolt's 30-40m split time of .87 seconds (something I find ridiculous) to estimate how fast Ronaldo would run 25m to 35m.
3.61 + .87 = a 4.48 35m time. Still have 1.6 meters to go. .87 x .16 = .1392 seconds. 4.48 + .1392 = 4.61
So naldo would have to accelerate like Usain Bolt () to post a 4.61 second 40 time, which would be a slow 40 time for a position player at the NFL combine.
Yeah, he's not accelerating like Bolt. I don't know why the floptrot crew (Philo is now an honorary member) continues to come at me.
lol gots here thinking washboard stomach and being ripped = being athletic and skilled. More interested in fapping to a player's body than what the player can bring to the game.
Like anyone here ever played anything outside of HS ball and ever saw any playing time if they did.
Dumbass, the fastest 200m sprinter in the history Great Britain was a futbol player in the lower divisions. If there was such a thing as field running in futbol then he would have been playing for Real Madrid.
A sport which prides itself as being America's PAST-time while referring to the dark ages b/c the current state of the league is worse than segregation.Referencing players from the 20's before integration.
Currently? Of course not.
When Prince was younger? Easily. See my latest post that illustrates that Ronaldo would have to accelerate like Usain Bolt to post a 4.6 40 yard dash time. The NFL combine is filled with 275lb-300lb fatass linemen who run the 40 in that range, so I don't get why you think it's a stretch that Prince, in high school, could run a 4.6-4.7ish 40?
We also have top speed data, as well. Ronaldo's top speed is 20.9 mph. Last year Prince topped out at 18.2 mph in the worst shape of his life.
Shredded, lean, and athletic looking doesn't = fast.
Hasn't played soccer since 2011 and has been a fulltime sprinter ever since.
"He's a soccer player, guys."
21 second 200m time as a teenager and he's not even the fastest guy on his own team
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Orlando
Dumbass, there are people who train for speed & there are those that train for speed-ENDURANCE. In Futbol you need BOTH speed & endurance to be a world class winger like Ronaldo. If you know anything about sprinting you would realize that Bolt would struggle to break 10 seconds consistently if he just trained for the 200m. Michael Johnson has the second fastest 100m split EVER but NEVER broke 10 second in a 100m dash so according to you he isn't a world class sprinter.
Why don't they have base runners in Futbol
That will tell you all you need about how much speed training futbol players focus on when a guy who couldn't break 21 seconds breaks the record after 6 months training.21 second 200m time as a teenager and he's not even the fastest guy on his own team
T-They train for it differently
I would bet you the moon that soccer players train up sprinting more than baseball players, especially considering the MLB season is 162 games with little time in between to workout intensively. , baseball players devote time to vision training. http://www.si.com/edge/2015/04/21/se...tampa-bay-rays
Look at all that sprinting!
And he's still faster than naldo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)