Page 4 of 41 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 1017
  1. #76
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,077
    talking about that... sorry about DeColo
    I thought he would become the next Manu tbh

  2. #77
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,635
    I thought he would become the next Manu tbh
    that was funny then, still funny now

  3. #78
    Old sport KaiRMD1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    5,378
    This ol' sport better not be another Ayres

  4. #79
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,077
    that was funny then, still funny now


    I cannot wait the De Colo threads when he will have two or three good games in a row

  5. #80
    The Good Doctor Rummpd's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    11,236
    Spurs, Raptors swap reserves




    Spurs get: Austin Daye




    Raptors get: Nando de Colo





    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------





    San Antonio Spurs: B









    Daye has shown flashes of promise during his five-year NBA career, entirely tied to his 3-point percentage. When he makes at least 40 percent of his 3s, as he did in 2011-12 with the Detroit Pistons and last season after being traded to the Memphis Grizzlies in January, he can be a useful rotation player. When he's not hitting -- this season he was 0-of-8 beyond the arc in limited action -- he's unplayable. Given Daye's size (6-11) and shot-blocking prowess, the tools are there for him to develop into a 3-and-D player. It's easy to see why the Spurs were interested. Alternatively, if Daye can't turn into a consistent defender in San Antonio's scheme, it's probably never going to happen.

    From Espn insider [Toronto got a B- for acquiring Nando]

  6. #81
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    Money move. Even if you add this year's salary, plus the $250K he's due next year, it's still less than DeColo's salary for this year. He's also an asset that could be flipped during the draft or free agency.

  7. #82
    Set for life Budkin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    22,648
    Daye-O!

  8. #83
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    144,711
    Money move. Even if you add this year's salary, plus the $250K he's due next year, it's still less than DeColo's salary for this year. He's also an asset that could be flipped during the draft or free agency.
    I don't know if he can currently be called an asset.

  9. #84
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    I don't know if he can currently be called an asset.
    Pardonez moi. His scantily guaranteed CONTRACT could be an asset.

  10. #85
    The OL' Perfessor wildbill2u's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    8,613
    As De Colo wasn't good enough to get off the bench most of the time, I don't see a big problem with trying a 6'11' SF. The worst that can happen is he takes Nando's place on the pine.

  11. #86
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    As De Colo wasn't good enough to get off the bench most of the time, I don't see a big problem with trying a 6'11' SF. The worst that can happen is he takes Nando's place on the pine.
    I'd say that was a darn near certainty.

  12. #87
    Veteran sexinthatsx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,094
    I thought he would become the next Manu tbh
    Marco Belinelli has a better chance of becoming the next Manu than Nando De Colo tbh...

  13. #88
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    31,048
    Money move. Even if you add this year's salary, plus the $250K he's due next year, it's still less than DeColo's salary for this year. He's also an asset that could be flipped during the draft or free agency.
    Pretty sure if you take proration into account, the Spurs pay money. Plus money next year is more valuable than money this year.

  14. #89
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    Pretty sure if you take proration into account, the Spurs pay money. Plus money next year is more valuable than money this year.
    You're right. With only .33 of the season left, the Spurs would be slight payers if they don't flip him during the draft or FA period, to the tune of ~$100K or so.

  15. #90
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    31,048
    You're right. With only .33 of the season left, the Spurs would be slight payers if they don't flip him during the draft or FA period, to the tune of ~$100K or so.
    Yeah. It's a small price if they want to get a look at Daye, or if a pick we don't know about changed hands.

    Bruno said the Spurs also got a TE, which would be worth the money by itself. But I'm skeptical of that. Because each team had 15 players on their roster, the Spurs had to treat the trade as a simultaneous deal, so they shouldn't have been able to use the min exception. Toronto should not have been able to use a TE for the same reason. Is there a flaw in this reasoning?

  16. #91
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    Yeah. It's a small price if they want to get a look at Daye, or if a pick we don't know about changed hands.

    Bruno said the Spurs also got a TE, which would be worth the money by itself. But I'm skeptical of that. Because each team had 15 players on their roster, the Spurs had to treat the trade as a simultaneous deal, so they shouldn't have been able to use the min exception. Toronto should not have been able to use a TE for the same reason. Is there a flaw in this reasoning?
    I thought you got a TE if the salaries were imbalanced. DeColo is making 1.4M, and Daye 950K this season. Shouldn't that generate a 450K TE?

  17. #92
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    31,048
    I thought you got a TE if the salaries were imbalanced. DeColo is making 1.4M, and Daye 950K this season. Shouldn't that generate a 450K TE?
    Maybe. He said one for $1.5 Million, though. He didn't mean just that small one. The only good thing about that TE is it would allow the team to claim a rookie cut off waivers. Better than nothing, I guess.

  18. #93
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    40,717
    Maybe. He said one for $1.5 Million, though. He didn't mean just that small one. The only good thing about that TE is it would allow the team to claim a rookie cut off waivers. Better than nothing, I guess.
    I don't see that, but I can't rule it out, either, after the intricacies of that GS/LAL trade that allowed a player to be paired with another before the expiration of the waiting period because of a technicality in the CBA.

  19. #94
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    31,048
    I don't see that, but I can't rule it out, either, after the intricacies of that GS/LAL trade that allowed a player to be paired with another before the expiration of the waiting period because of a technicality in the CBA.
    That happened because GS had an open roster spot and could use the min exception. So they got a $2.7 Million TE instead of a $2 Million one. Had the Spurs waived Brown, they could have gotten then full TE.

  20. #95
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002

  21. #96
    Veteran Libri's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,209

  22. #97
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,635

  23. #98
    Believe. Calispursfan11's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Post Count
    3,898
    This guy looks eerily like a very poor man's tayshaun prince at least physique-wise and coordination or lack thereof-wise. Mediocre at best but hopefully something slightly better.

  24. #99
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    17,101
    soft jumpshooter. But he's long and young so he'll be tried out to support Kawhi's assignments

    why are ppl comparing him to ayres, dude is a toothpick. Ayres is a big body (who happens to suck)

    Hater's best case scenario: Tayshaun Prince/Andrea Barganini
    Hater's worst case scenario: Adam Morrison
    how the can you put bargnani and prince in the same comparison

  25. #100
    GOAT Sean88888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    63
    Y'all on his defense but his Defensive Win Share is solid throughout his career. We might very well have acquired him to guard Durant.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../dayeau01.html

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •