While that is obviously true Texas is notorious for systemic racism particularly East Texas.
So all 5318 officers (2012 number) in the Houston PD are racists. Nice conspiracy theory, re .
While that is obviously true Texas is notorious for systemic racism particularly East Texas.
You rightwingnuts KNOW all Muslims are radicals terrorists
I'm a "rightwingnut" too.
Nice trolling.
If only he was as credible as Fraud King.
A huge problem with the study noted in the article:
If we take just the incidents in which police actually made a decision to engage a person or persons then skin color is important. It could be that engaging a white person was done because there was something very obviously wrong in the first place that caused the officer to engage. It could be that the very slightest su ion caused an officer to stop or engage a black person. So basically the data is already skewed.
Note to fuzzy and others:
The fact that some on this board took the time to read and critize this particular ongoing study shows a bias. Would we be as critical if the study clearly confirmed my belief that blacks do get treated unfairly by cops?
I doubt it.
Welcome to the echo chamber.
yep, Fryer's original article clearly noted that he didn't account for the purpose behind the stops, but merely the ensuing treatment from officers AFTER stops. all these criticisms were already acknowledged
is this just from Houston? because this study doesnt mean much if it's not externally valid imo
off. A bias towards what? An informed opinion?
If the study had a localized, small sample size, had a biased data source, and claimed to be a peer reviewed when in fact it was published in Ebony then you would get pushback. Your fantasy that there are not people avid on the other side is nonsense.
You're the one who spent months spamming Fraud King's lies uncritically because they supported your narrative.
Yep that's why I said noted in the article.
I think it's very important.
Last edited by pgardn; 07-23-2016 at 04:26 PM.
Biased in what you choose to look closely at you Fckn dimwitted twerp.
Its bigger than just this study.
Everyone does it. Don't try so hard to be special son.
Are you really going to play coy to the connotation of political bias on a political forum, dimwit? As I said, off.
This is stupid. I posted one tweet where he had a picture of Brown's corpse and the position of the police truck. Since then your dumbass has been trying to pin that on me.
Wtf are you babbling about?
Playing coy... Sure thing.
Why don't you sit and think about it a bit longer. You may surprise yourself no you won't..
And stop with the parrot response.
What do you think I meant when I said
A bias towards what? An informed opinion?
It was never published in an academic journal. Peer review was never in play. His expertise is also in economics not criminology.
is your expertise in quantum mechanics?
indeed, then it is not particularly interesting findings until there are enough peer reviewed studies in journals for a meta-analysis, tbh
It disproves Occam's Razor apparently
do I need to be to say that it is more complex than newtonian mechanics?
It's not academic research so its not like what you said.
Well no one is talking about the paper so that works for me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)