Pop is done. Retire already.
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursna...dy-chris-paul/
Good advice, tbh..would have loved to have seen CP3 in a Spurs jersey for the past 10 years(no disrespect to TP, a top 10 PG of all-time)..
Last edited by HarlemHeat37; 02-16-2017 at 09:03 PM.
Pop is done. Retire already.
Murray to Pop: Study Phil Jackson.Pop to Murray: Study Chris Paul
And Phil might consider studying RC.
Great, now we'll never make it past the 2nd round.
Yes, second place, I know, what has he done for you LATELY. Should have won tonight even without a game to play.
Dream BIG.
I'm still trying to figure out how Parker is a top 10 all time pg. Even though we are spurs fans, we dont need to be like Laker fans with that "kobe top 5 all time" bull .
Study Doc Rivers?
Study Billy Donovan?
Are you saying TP is the top 10 PG or did you say it was CP3?
"Study Chris Paul"
"What about Tony?"
"NO"
Chris Paul is a much better example than Russ, a player who Dejounte is also watching, so ask yourself who is better mentor Russ or CP3?
Regarding Pop and Phil,
1) Pop took a shot at Phil in 2002 saying that he allows someone (Kobe) to take "as many as eight shots in a row" and yet this season Kawhi has a higher USAGE% than Kobe had (check it via basketball-reference.com) it's a slight lead but put that in perspective
2) Pop is clearly the better ing coach, I mean look at their legacy Phil has les but no disciples in this league. Yes he won more but he always had more. He had arguably the best player of all time, yet we had to go against a guy who is one championship away from possibly surpassing Jordan! Oh and Kobe and Shaq in their respective primes and healthy. Pop is the one who did more with less, that's for sure. And the guy is a superstar among coaches over in Europe and the NBA and has so many disciples.
The vast majority of coaches out there would rather be Pop not Phil Jackson. I think that's a statistic you can accurately measure and decides the argument as to who was the better and most successful coach.
of course CP would be a mentor because Russ is just an idiot ... but Murray has the tools to play more in a Russ way than duplicate CP
Both better PGs than porker tbh
CP3 on the floor with Duncan would have been a frightening thing. People here make jokes because the Spurs (almost) always found a way to beat his teams, and he doesn't have a ring. But he never had Tim Duncan, either.
Paul worked with a trainer in the off-seasons who made him a lot more explosive, and a much better player overall. I think Murray would benefit more than most from working with him, or someone like him. If the Spurs don't send him, Murray should spend some of his rookie money and go on his own.
I found an article about the guy, and about Paul working with him:
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/story/l...fofanah-011816
Is Murray going to learn the awesome arts of whining and flopping?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)