Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 56
  1. #1
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    Report questions science, reliability of crime lab evidence

    The National Academy of Sciences says many courtroom claims about fingerprints, bite marks and other evidence lack scientific verification. It finds forensics inconsistent and in disarray nationwide.


    By Maura Dolan and Jason Felch

    February 19, 2009


    Sweeping claims made in courtrooms about fingerprints, ballistics, bite marks and other forensic evidence often have little or no basis in science, according to a landmark report Wednesday by the nation’s leading science body.


    The report by the National Academy of Sciences called for a wholesale overhaul of the crime lab system, which has become increasingly crucial to American jurisprudence.


    Many experts said the report could have a broad impact on crime labs and the courts, ushering in changes at least as significant as those generated by the advent of DNA evidence two decades ago. But the substantial reforms proposed by the academy would take years of planning and major federal funding to enact.



    In the meantime, the findings are expected to unleash a flood of new legal challenges by defense attorneys.



    “This is a major turning point in the history of forensic science in America,” said Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, a national organization dedicated to exonerating the wrongfully convicted. He said the findings would immediately lead to court challenges.


    “If this report does not result in real change, when will it ever happen?”
    The office of the Los Angeles County Public Defender plans to use the National Academy report to file challenges on the admissibility of fingerprint evidence, and is reviewing cases in which fingerprints played a primary role in convictions, officials said.


    Separately, the Los Angeles Police Department has been reviewing 1,000 fingerprint cases after discovering that two people had been wrongfully accused because of faulty fingerprint analyses.


    The academy, the preeminent science advisor to the federal government, found a system in disarray: labs that are underfunded and beholden to law enforcement, and that lack independent oversight and consistent standards.


    The report concludes that the deficiencies pose “a continuing and serious threat to the quality and credibility of forensic science practice,” imperiling efforts to protect society from criminals and shield innocent people from wrongful convictions.


    With the notable exception of DNA evidence, the report says that many forensic methods have never been shown to consistently and reliably connect crime scene evidence to specific people or sources.


    “The simple reality is that the interpretation of forensic evidence is not always based on scientific studies to determine its validity,” the report says.


    For example, the frequent claims that fingerprint analysis had a zero error rate are “not scientifically plausible,” the report said. The scientific basis for bite mark evidence is called “insufficient to conclude that bite mark comparisons can result in a conclusive match.”


    Recent cases of CSI gone awry have underscored the report’s urgency. Of the 232 people exonerated by DNA evidence, more than half of the cases involved faulty or invalidated forensic science, according to the Innocence Project.


    Margaret Berger, a law professor at Brooklyn Law School and a member of the panel, explained: “We’re not saying all these disciplines are useless. We’re saying there is a lot of work that needs to be done.”


    Said U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Harry Edwards, co-chairman of the panel: “There are a lot of people who are concerned, and they should be concerned. Forensic science is the handmaiden of the legal system… . If you claim to be science, you ought to put yourself to the test.”


    Although the panel’s recommendations are not binding, they are considered influential.



    Among the recommendations:
    * Create a new federal agency, the National Ins ute of Fore
    nsic Science, to fund scientific research and disseminate basic standards.


    * Make crime labs independent of law enforcement. Most crime labs are run by police agencies, which can lead to bias, a growing body of research shows.


    * Require that expert witnesses and forensic analysts be certified by the new agency, and that labs be accredited. These standards are now optional.



    * Fund research into the scientific basis for claims routinely made in court, as well as studies of the accuracy and reliability of forensic techniques.
    Those recommendations have been cautiously embraced by leading associations of forensic scientists, which in 2005 helped convince Congress that the study was necessary.

    “You can’t continue to do business in 2009 the way you did in 1915,” said Joseph Polski of the International Assn. for Identification, whose members include examiners of fingerprints, questioned do ents, footwear and tire tracks. “We knew there would be things in there we’d like and things we didn’t like.”


    Many forensic scientists were hesitant to criticize the report for fear of seeming resistant to testing and scrutiny. But there were some delicate complaints.


    “It’s not the science of forensic science that is in need of repair, I think; it’s how the results are interpreted in the courtroom,” said Dean Gialamis, head of the American Society of Crime Lab Directors, who was quick to add that his group welcomed the recommendations. The report was hailed by many defense attorneys, scientists and law professors, who for years have been raising scientific and legal challenges.



    “The courts were highly skeptical of experts and resistant to hearing their arguments,” said Simon A. Cole, a professor of criminology at UC Irvine who has often testified for defense teams about the limitations of fingerprint evidence. “I feel like I’m Alice coming out of the rabbit hole and back into a world of sanity and reason.”


    The report had harsh words for the FBI Laboratory and the National Ins ute of Justice, the research arm of the Justice Department, which have shown little enthusiasm for exploring the shortcomings of forensic science.



    “Neither agency has recognized, let alone articulated, a need for change,” the report states, adding that they could be subject to pro-prosecution biases.


    Eric H. Holder Jr., the new attorney general, signaled in comments to reporters shortly before the report was released that he would take the report’s concerns seriously: “I think we need to devote a lot of attention and a lot of resources to that problem.”



    Prosectors on the front lines, however, were more skeptical.


    “I know the defense is probably starting bonfires, but this should not in any way shake up anyone’s confidence in forensics,” said Paula Wulff, manager and senior attorney of the DNA Forensic Program of the National District Attorneys Assn.



    She called the recommendations a “Cadillac of aspirations,” and expressed doubt that they would be followed given the poor state of the economy.
    All sides, however, agreed that the report signals an aggressive reentry of scientists into issues that for decades have fallen to lawyers, judges and juries to resolve.

  2. #2
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Why am I embracing this as good news?

    Is it because I think we are moving toward becoming a police state or is it because in a police state, this wouldnt matter anyway?

    IMO, shows like CSI can kiss my ass. Turns everyone into a junior detective because they can pull a print off a plastic surfcae with a book of matches and a fish tank (ty Eddie Murphy).

    I am always of the mind of presuming innocence, but thats old school. Dont get me wrong, criminals belong in prison, but its been my experience that the State is is very much gung-ho about locking up any and all criminals, small or big.

    It doesnt come as much surprise to hear crime labs are pro-prosecution. The one down the street is owned and operated by the city. How many times do you think that particular lab has produced results that hurt the prosecutions case? Yeah, me neither.

  3. #3
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    50,681
    Why am I embracing this as good news?

    Is it because I think we are moving toward becoming a police state or is it because in a police state, this wouldnt matter anyway?

    IMO, shows like CSI can kiss my ass. Turns everyone into a junior detective because they can pull a print off a plastic surfcae with a book of matches and a fish tank (ty Eddie Murphy).

    I am always of the mind of presuming innocence, but thats old school. Dont get me wrong, criminals belong in prison, but its been my experience that the State is is very much gung-ho about locking up any and all criminals, small or big.

    It doesnt come as much surprise to hear crime labs are pro-prosecution. The one down the street is owned and operated by the city. How many times do you think that particular lab has produced results that hurt the prosecutions case? Yeah, me neither.
    Yup.

    There is a danger in giving the nod too much to the state. For all of the abuses of our rights that take place, those rights are there for a reason.

    On a somewhat related note, I have pretty much decided that declaring "no contest" to speeding tickets is for suckers.

    "Not guilty" and gimmie a jury trial.

    I am 3-0 when I have done that.
    Once the cop never showed up.
    One took over a year and a half to get to trial stage, and the patrolman had since moved out of state.
    One was where the prosecutor took a look at the dash cam and noticed right away that it wasn't my car that triggered the radar, I was genuinely innocent.

    I didn't bother with the one I got in Schertz though, but I probably should have. That one I did do a no contest with. There were a LOT of people there, and it was readily obvious that ticket income was a large source of revenue for the town.

    After that, I was halfway tempted to put a sign up where everyone could read it:

    "It is your right to insist on a jury trial for your ticket. Do you think the city of Schertz has enough jurors for EVERYBODY they give a ticket to?"

    Sixty people in the court with me. 60*6 (minor offenses generally get a "pe " jury to my understanding) =360 or fewer if one jury handles more than one case.

    My observations:

    Don't be a to the cop when he/she gives you the ticket. If you make them mad and they remember you, they will make it a point to show up.

    Don't get a lawyer. This pisses the prosecutor/cops off because traffic ticket lawyers are s.

    Be polite and friendly to the prosecutor, but remember they are NOT your friend.

  4. #4
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Don't be a to the cop when he/she gives you the ticket. If you make them mad and they remember you, they will make it a point to show up.

    Don't get a lawyer. This pisses the prosecutor/cops off because traffic ticket lawyers are s.

    Be polite and friendly to the prosecutor, but remember they are NOT your friend.
    Ha...we think alike. I never plead "no contest" on my tickets. I always fight them and they always get thrown out. The courts dont waste their time on speeding tickets by jury. Theyd just as soon let you walk.

    Also, when it comes to being pulled over, Im the nicest person in the world to the cop. I keep my hands on the wheel (where they can see them) and tell them when I am going to reach in my glovebox/backpocket.

    It gets them comfortable. They see that I am trying to alleviate their fear of "random stop, cop death" and it usually ends with a "Well, try slowing down through here...its frequented by cops."

    Thank you, officer. Have a good day, officer. No, officer. Blah blah blah

    I actually respect individual cops a lot. But the old saying holds true for them as a demographic as well...get a bunch of them together and groupthink takes over with the imposition of their collective will.

  5. #5
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    This is why they have the Frye standard and the Daubert standard.


    I hope this study doesn't result in a lot of GOOD science getting tossed.

  6. #6
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,339
    i remember b4 the hype of these cop shows, there was alot of vacancy for forensic jobs...untill the hype came alot of people got hooked on the shows and applied for jobs...and there was none

  7. #7
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    i remember b4 the hype of these cop shows, there was alot of vacancy for forensic jobs...untill the hype came alot of people got hooked on the shows and applied for jobs...and there was none


    LOL. Just because people WANT these jobs doesn't mean they're QUALIFIED for these jobs.

  8. #8
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    This is why they have the Frye standard and the Daubert standard.
    Frye is the "generally accepted" standard, Daubert makes judges gatekeepers and stipulates the "relevancy" and "reliability" of expert testimony.

    • Empirical testing: the theory or technique must be falsifiable, refutable, and testable.
    • Subjected to peer review and publication.
    • Known or potential error rate and the existence and maintenance of standards concerning its operation.
    • Whether the theory and technique is generally accepted by a relevant scientific community.

    Forensic scientists asked for this study. If forensic science had minded its p and q's in the area of the third bullet point, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

    Physician, heal thyself.

  9. #9
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Frye is the "generally accepted" standard, Daubert makes judges gatekeepers and stipulates the "relevancy" and "reliability" of expert testimony.


    Unrelated, but hilarious video of a deposition of an expert witness.


  10. #10
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    That's pretty funny DarrinS. It's also very Texas.

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    Unrelated, but hilarious video of a deposition of an expert witness.

    Joe Jamail is a jackass. A very wealthy jackass.

  12. #12
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,339
    Forensic scientists asked for this study. If forensic science had minded its p and q's in the area of the third bullet point, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

    Physician, heal thyself.
    you know whats bull ? CSI shows hahhahaa...when they investigatin the angle of the bullets and ...here a few examples...








  13. #13
    "Have to check the film" PixelPusher's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    3,396
    i am always of the mind of presuming innocence, but thats old school. Dont get me wrong, criminals belong in prison, but its been my experience that the state is is very much gung-ho about locking up any and all criminals, small or big.

    pennsylvania rocked by 'jailing kids for cash' scandal

    by stephanie chen

    (cnn) -- at a friend's sleepover more than a year ago, 14-year-old phillip swartley pocketed change from unlocked vehicles in the neighborhood to buy chips and soft drinks. The cops caught him.
    Former luzerne county president judge mark ciavarella pleaded guilty, faces prison and was disbarred.

    There was no need for an attorney, said phillip's mother, amy swartley, who thought at most, the judge would slap her son with a fine or community service.

    But she was shocked to find her eighth-grader handcuffed and shackled in the courtroom and sentenced to a youth detention center. Then, he was shipped to a boarding school for troubled teens for nine months.

    "yes, my son made a mistake, but i didn't think he was going to be taken away from me," said swartley, a 41-year-old single mother raising two boys in wilkes-barre, pennsylvania.

    Cnn does not usually identify minors accused of crimes. But swartley and others agreed to be named to bring public attention to the issue.

    As scandals from wall street to washington roil the public trust, the justice system in luzerne county, in the heart of pennsylvania's struggling coal country, has also fallen prey to corruption. The county has been rocked by a kickback scandal involving two elected judges who essentially jailed kids for cash. Many of the children had appeared before judges without a lawyer. Video watch the corruption scandal that is rocking pennsylvania »

    the nonprofit juvenile law center in philadelphia said phillip is one of at least 5,000 children over the past five years who appeared before former luzerne county president judge mark ciavarella.

    Ciavarella pleaded guilty earlier this month to federal criminal charges of fraud and other tax charges, according to the u.s. Attorney's office. Former luzerne county senior judge michael conahan also pleaded guilty to the same charges. The two secretly received more than $2.6 million, prosecutors said.

    The judges have been disbarred and have resigned from their elected positions. They agreed to serve 87 months in prison under their plea deals. Ciavarella and conahan did not return calls, and their attorneys told cnn that they have no comment.

    Ciavarella, 58, along with conahan, 56, corruptly and fraudulently "created the potential for an increased number of juvenile offenders to be sent to juvenile detention facilities," federal court do ents alleged. Children would be placed in private detention centers, under contract with the court, to increase the head count. In exchange, the two judges would receive kickbacks.

    The juvenile law center said it plans to file a class-action lawsuit this week representing what they say are victims of corruption. Juvenile law center attorneys cite a few examples of harsh penalties judge ciavarella meted out for relatively petty offenses:

    # ciavarvella sent 15-year-old hillary transue to a wilderness camp for mocking an assistant principal on a myspace page.

    # he whisked 13-year-old shane bly, who was accused of trespassing in a vacant building, from his parents and confined him in a boot camp for two weekends.

    # he sentenced kurt kruger, 17, to detention and five months of boot camp for helping a friend steal dvds from wal-mart.

    Several other lawsuits on behalf of the juveniles who have appeared in ciavarella's courtroom have emerged.

    The private juvenile detention centers, owned by mid atlantic youth services corp., are still operating and are not a target of the federal investigation, according court do ents. The company cooperated in the investigation, the do ents said.

    A spokesman from the company denied that its current owner, gregory zappala, knew about the kickbacks.

    Ciavarella assured the community that he could provide justice. Elected to the bench in 1996, he once ran for judge on the promise that he would punish "people who break the law," according to local reports.

    The corruption began in 2002, when conahan shut down the state juvenile detention center and used money from the luzerne county budget to fund a multimillion-dollar lease for the private facilities. Despite some raised eyebrows from the community, county commissioners approved the deal.

    The federal government began investigating in 2006.

    "it's been a dark cloud hanging over the county for a very, very long time," said luzerne county commissioner maryanne c. Petrilla, whose office approved the judges' budgets during the corruption. "i'm looking forward to the ship turning around now and us moving in the right direction."

    the kickback scandal highlights a major problem in the juvenile justice system in luzerne county and across the country, attorneys say. They say hundreds of children who appeared before ciavarella didn't have lawyers.

    "kids think very much in the present, and they have limited abilities to understand long-term consequences," said robin dahlberg, an attorney at the american civil liberties union in new york who specializes in juvenile issues.

    Dahlberg's recent study in ohio revealed that some of the counties had as many as 90 percent of children going through the court system without a lawyer.

    "this pennsylvania case is a sad reminder of why kids need an attorney," she said.

    A 1967 supreme court ruling says children have a right to counsel. However, many states allow children and their parents to appear without an attorney by completing a waiver.

    Pennsylvania is among about half of the states in the country that allow waivers to be signed for juveniles to appear before a judge without an attorney, legal experts say.

    In luzerne county, teens who waived counsel were at greater risk of being sent to placement center than those with representation.

    About 50 percent of the children who waived counsel before ciavarella were sent to some kind of placement, the philadelphia-based juvenile law center reports. In comparison, the juvenile court judges' commission in pennsylvania found that 8.4 percent of juveniles across the state wind up in placement.

    "when you have this many kids waiving counsel, then that's way out of line," said marsha levick, an attorney at the juvenile law center. "there was no record [ciavarella] was assuring the child and parent about the consequences of not having representation."

    minors charged with nonviolent crimes were often given harsher sentences than what probation officers recommended, court do ents say. Other investigators say the trials lasted a few minutes at most.

    All four of the teens cited in this story say they appeared before ciavarella without lawyers.

    "i was sort of shocked and taken aback," hillary transue, the myspace offender who is now 17, said of her experience in ciavarella's courtroom in april 2007. "i didn't really understand what was going on."

    the juvenile law center says it first red-flagged ciavarella in 1999 after discovering that a 13-year-old boy was detained without being read his rights and had appeared in court without a lawyer. When the case became public, ciavarella promised the public that every minor in his courtroom would have a lawyer.

    Judges must verbally explain the consequences of appearing in court without counsel to minors and parents, lawyers say. Juvenile law center officials say ciavarella neglected to do so in many cases.

    Yet in the past five years, attorneys, law enforcement officials and other judges did not report ciavarella's behavior to the judicial conduct board of pennsylvania, says joseph a. Massa jr., chief counsel at the board.

    Privatizing detention facilities is a growing in popularity among governments because the companies say they offer lower rates than the state.

    Pennsylvania has the second highest number of private facilities after florida, accounting for about 11 percent of the private facilities in the united states, according to the national center for juvenile justice in pittsburgh, pennsylvania.

    Critics say private prisons lack transparency because they don't go through the same inspections and audits as a state facility, and this may have allowed payoffs to go so long without being noticed.

    "once somebody is going to make more money by holding more kids, there is a pretty good predictable profit motive," said criminal justice consultant judith greene, who heads a nonprofit group called justice strategies. "it's predictable that companies are going to tolerate certain behaviors they shouldn't."

    an audit draft obtained by the philadelphia inquirer showed that luzerne county was spending more than $1.2 million in expenses that weren't allowed under state regulations. The pennsylvania department of public welfare, the agency overseeing the audits, says the audit drafts are not final.

    The audits also allege that two people paid the judges. Attorneys for former mid-atlantic owner robert powell say that their client is one of those people but that he was pressured by the judges to make payments. The attorneys say powell never offered to pay the judges, never sought to influence any juvenile case and is now cooperating with the investigation. Zappala and powell were partners until zappala bought out powell in 2008.

    Senior judge arthur e. Grim of berks county is reviewing the cases for minors who appeared before ciavarella. Court officials say some children may have their records expunged or be granted new hearings.

    The philadelphia bar association has expressed outrage, assuring the public that the rest of the judges on the state's bench are "composed of highly qualified, honorable and honest people, who take their responsibilities to the public very seriously."

    but some of the children -- many who, like phillip swartley, are now young adults -- have become jaded and believe that their cases were tainted in ciavarella's courtroom.
    Advertisement

    after being sent to boarding school, phillip, now 15, became withdrawn and depressed, his mother says.

    "what do these kids see of the legal system and of authority figures?" amy swartley asked. "these kids see people who abuse their power. Now, we have a whole county and generation of children who have lost trust in the system."

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    462
    That's pretty funny DarrinS. It's also very Texas.
    lmao! That video was great.

    I love Texas.

  15. #15
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,339
    those ins utions are not the solution for petty crimes commited by minors....all it does is put them in a group of people only to boasts why they're in there and start a gang....

    send these clowns to the army imo....

  16. #16
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    Joe Jamail is a jackass. A very wealthy jackass.
    That is Joe Jamail?

    Wow. Are depositions often like that?

  17. #17
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    That is Joe Jamail?

    Wow. Are depositions often like that?
    No. It only happens when you're Joe Jamail.

    I should let up on him. He's been very generous, and contributed in an indirect way to my education.

    Anyway, Joe Jamail is the guy on the right. You can only see his arm.

  18. #18
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    The old guy didn't like the question so rather than answer it he started a big fight with his (admittedly correct) "incipient verbal diarrhea" prediction.

  19. #19
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Joe Jamail is a jackass. A very wealthy jackass.


    Is he famous?

  20. #20
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570
    Was it Texaco Jamail raked for hundreds of millions? My memory is fuzzy.

  21. #21
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,570

  22. #22
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,339
    he made all of that from being a lawyer?

  23. #23
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    He's a billionaire trial lawyer. If current trends hold, UT will soon be known as the Jamail-McCombs University of Texas.

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    he made all of that from being a lawyer?
    He made, like, 300-400 million on that case. (The judgment was for 11.2 billion.) He's currently worth a billion or two, I think.

  25. #25
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654

    Damn. Think of how many Marine One helicopters that would buy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •