No-way. Randle > MJ
Dude played in 88 less college games than Duncan which means his stats are FAR better....
Julius Randle
Height: 6-9 Weight: 250 School: Kentucky
College Career: 40 G, 15.0 PPG, 10.4 RPG, 1.4 APG
Tim Duncan
Height: 6-11 Weight: 248 School: Wake Forest
College Career: 128 G, 16.5 PPG, 12.3 RPG, 2.3 APG
in less games and still has worse stats than Tim.
Post their shooting percentages, Kool.
Randle was the no brainer pick at 7, but you're going to be very disappointed if you think he's going to turn into a superstar.
This is a joke, right?
I honestly don't think Randle's game will translate well at all
Good bye never really means good bye, tbh.
Randle became a victim to a deep team whereas Duncan was the lone star on his..... Randle > Duncan dude played in 88 less games and is more impressive tbh
OP secretly hates the Lakers. No other explanation.
Did Aids break his twiggy leg in his first ever game?
Biggest difference? Injury....give the boy a chance to play..ok Choke Nation?
I agree with you here, let him play though before you say he is better than Tim Duncan...
The comparison was at the. College level
Duncan was a consensus #1 overall pick and was unanimously considered to be the next great big man and a clear franchise player. Randle wasn't even a top 5 pick
I know man, it's laughable. Some posts in here really just make me think either someone is trolling or really ing crazy.
Hey, Kool:::I'll just bet it does.
tee, hee.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)