Page 130 of 161 FirstFirst ... 3080120126127128129130131132133134140 ... LastLast
Results 3,226 to 3,250 of 4001
  1. #3226
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    I don't think they have a sinister motive. I think its a fairly worthless motive. When I try to learn about a subject, I don't only search for information on the subject that happens to agree with a preconceived notion of the subject.

    I do think that Poptech avoided a direct question several times and it appears he or she is very adapt at doing so. I also think some of the scientific "facts" Poptech has posted are fairly ignorant,

    Enjoy the list, Darrin. Needing a list like that is fairly telling, in my opinion.

    Enjoy your list, Manny.

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/data...te-change.html
    DarrinS is offline

  2. #3227
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    You don't even bother to read before you post it once again:

    Global Warming Links, sorted by argument

    Sort by argument | Peer-Review | Last week | Last month

    Number of pro-AGW links are indicated in green, skeptic links in red.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  3. #3228
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    You would then use the list to prove that all presidents were named William, right?

    That's what the PopTech list claimed?
    DarrinS is offline

  4. #3229
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    You would then use the list to prove that all presidents were named William, right?
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  5. #3230
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    Is that my list?

    I don't think I've ever posted it.

    I have journal access and I live with a masters holding librarian. I don't need lists prepared by others as I'm more than capable of finding information on the subject. Pretty damn sure I've read more papers on climate science in the past week than you've read...ever.

    Keep telling yourself that I'm at the level you are, Darrin, and that I need others to make lists for me.
    MannyIsGod is offline

  6. #3231
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    You don't even bother to read before you post it once again:

    Number of pro-AGW links are indicated in green, skeptic links in red.

    DarrinS is offline

  7. #3232
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    That's what the PopTech list claimed?
    Internally within some of the papers certainly.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  8. #3233
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    Its a list that shows both sides of the argument.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  9. #3234
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Is that my list?

    I don't think I've ever posted it.

    I have journal access and I live with a masters holding librarian.

    <in Napolean Dynomite voice> Lucky!

    Does she wear those glasses, too?
    DarrinS is offline

  10. #3235
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    That's what the PopTech list claimed?
    No, thats how you have used the Poptech list. You in the past have claimed the papers I have posted were bad science while holding those on that list as correct. (An example of your excellent mastery of the science behind the subject)
    MannyIsGod is offline

  11. #3236
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    RG will answer every question directed at him. I've never seen him avoid a question or term it irrelevant.

    I find it hilarious he's the one being accused of dancing here.
    He just sidesteps it, and insists on a change of topics so he doesn't have to answer some things.

    You flat put ignore important questions when they are too tough for you.

    You never clarified with me where you were going with the ice cap, ice sheet thing, and seemed completely silent when I reminded you geothermal activity also plays a roll with ice sheets. I think I completely blew away a victory you though you had, and will not admit it.
    Wild Cobra is offline

  12. #3237
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    I ignore your questions because you're an idiot and you don't understand what you're talking about. Tell me again where ice sheets form? On the ocean, right? Tell me again how the ocean is behind the warming? Tell me again how AGW theory says that CO2 is somehow creating new energy.

    The list of your idiocies goes on. THATS why I ignore your questions. You're more than welcome to believe you have scored victories on me.
    MannyIsGod is offline

  13. #3238
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I don't get what the big deal is about with these peer reviewed papers.

    I haven't looked at very many yet, but it appears simply as a resource. Not all of them necessarily claim to refute the AGW alarmist viewpoints, but have good studies that can and be used.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 04-30-2012 at 04:12 PM.
    Wild Cobra is offline

  14. #3239
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    <in Napolean Dynomite voice> Lucky!

    Does she wear those glasses, too?
    She does. She's pretty hot, TBH. Its very awesome to have a person who's job is to find information willing to help me out when I need it (and I need it quite often).
    MannyIsGod is offline

  15. #3240
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    <in Napolean Dynomite voice> Lucky!

    Does she wear those glasses, too?
    The argument has been about cherry picking. You just posted a site that supports AGW theory that posts articles that support both positions: skeptic and that of most of the scientific community.

    Compare that to PopSophists list: 900+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm



    Critical thinking skills. All of that.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  16. #3241
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I ignore your questions because you're an idiot and you don't understand what you're talking about. Tell me again where ice sheets form? On the ocean, right? Tell me again how the ocean is behind the warming? Tell me again how AGW theory says that CO2 is somehow creating new energy.

    The list of your idiocies goes on. THATS why I ignore your questions. You're more than welcome to believe you have scored victories on me.
    My God...

    I confuse the terminology once, correct myself, and you are locked into believing what I said wrong and later revised.

    Ice sheets form on land, and some can flow into the sea. Glaciers.

    Now we were talking about sea ice when you brought that up, and never responded back when I asked for clarification of what you were implying.

    Why type of ethics do you have to lie, and claim I don't know what it is when I almost immediately corrected my mistake? Yes, I get terminology wrong sometimes.

    I see it as a way for you to discontinue a point you are losing.
    Wild Cobra is offline

  17. #3242
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    Ice sheets form on land, and some can flow into the sea. Glaciers.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  18. #3243
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,319
    TeyshaBlue is offline

  19. #3244
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,319
    We really, really need a facepalm emoticon
    TeyshaBlue is offline

  20. #3245
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    Yeah, you only messed up one time WC. You constantly display a mastery of well - everything? I am being completely unreasonable here.
    MannyIsGod is offline

  21. #3246
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,448
    We really, really need a facepalm emoticon
    I suggest the following:

    MannyIsGod is offline

  22. #3247
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

  23. #3248
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Tell me again how the ocean is behind the warming?
    What part don't you understand?

    I never claimed it was behind [the] warming, but plays a large role. That the extra sun has increased in output twice since the 1700's. This last time from about 1900 to about 1950. The oceans get warmer and move, solubility factors change, precipitation changes, everything changes. But it takes time for the effects.
    Tell me again how AGW theory says that CO2 is somehow creating new energy.
    I never said that. It is your failure to understand how the greenhouse effect works. It is your assumption that you turn around, and lie to others of what I say. I used the same modeling you don't dispute from peer reviewed studies, and when I show the number changes with extra solar energy as the source power, and how the greenhouse gasses, as a feedback mechanism respond to extra input, you fail to understand what is going on. You claim I don't understand thermodynamics. It is you who don't understand what is happening.

    Energy is not created. It's just like extra greenhouse gasses trap energy making higher temperatures. However, what I was explaining is how extra input to the system also warms, and has the effective amplification by the positive feedback of the greenhouse effect.
    Wild Cobra is offline

  24. #3249
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Yeah, you only messed up one time WC. You constantly display a mastery of well - everything? I am being completely unreasonable here.
    Tell me why I'm wrong then.

    Am I wrong because I left out a part?

    Does leaving out a minimum size make it wrong?
    Wild Cobra is offline

  25. #3250
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,829
    What part don't you understand?

    I never claimed it was behind [the] warming, but plays a large role. That the extra sun has increased in output twice since the 1700's. This last time from about 1900 to about 1950. The oceans get warmer and move, solubility factors change, precipitation changes, everything changes. But it takes time for the effects.
    I never said that. It is your failure to understand how the greenhouse effect works. It is your assumption that you turn around, and lie to others of what I say. I used the same modeling you don't dispute from peer reviewed studies, and when I show the number changes with extra solar energy as the source power, and how the greenhouse gasses, as a feedback mechanism respond to extra input, you fail to understand what is going on. You claim I don't understand thermodynamics. It is you who don't understand what is happening.

    Energy is not created. It's just like extra greenhouse gasses trap energy making higher temperatures. However, what I was explaining is how extra input to the system also warms, and has the effective amplification by the positive feedback of the greenhouse effect.
    Woot more thermodynamics and solubility! These questions were never addressed the other 5 times just this year you brought them up. Just like the solar output wasn't ever responded to.
    FuzzyLumpkins is offline

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •