Why I think Climate Change Denial is little more than pseudoscience.

[MannyIsGod]

Yeah no big deal, Dr. Spencer.

One way showed cooling, the other shows warming.

NO big deal.

Nice to see your admitted conformation bias at work, Yoni.

[MannyIsGod]

After reading his response to Manny's regurgitated criticism of him, yep; he's the type of scientist to which I wish to hitch my wagon.

Care to pick on anyone else on the list?

So, are they pseudoscientists or not?

You hitch your wagon to him based on his results. Don't act like its anything else.

Do I need to repeat myself, Yoni? The answer to your question is only a few posts up.

[Poptech]

So John Christy and Roy Spencer didn't change the way UAH temperature record is calculated and change their stance that their record showed cooling?

Why do you continue to lie? They were not claiming it showed a cooling since the 1970s when this correction was published,

Correcting Temperature Data Sets
(Science, Volume 310, Number 5750, pp. 972-973, November 2005)
- John R. Christy, Roy W. Spencer

I am still waiting for the citations and quotes to defend your smears against Dr. Spencer.

[MannyIsGod]

They never claimed it was cooling?

http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/...D%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Really? Read the abstract.

Thanks.

[Poptech]

They never claimed it was cooling?

http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/...D%3E2.0.CO%3B2

Really? Read the abstract.

Thanks.

1994? The correction had was done in 2005, you are missing ten years.

[MannyIsGod]

Poptech is back peddling master in this thread.

Can't wait to see how the goal posts get moved next.

[MannyIsGod]

Oh I'm sorry, does "never" not cover 1994?

In that case, carry on.

[MannyIsGod]

You might want to change your little le there though. Seems like you were pretty much refuted.

[Poptech]

You lied and claimed that the correction made was to correct a cooling trend,

So John Christy and Roy Spencer didn't change the way UAH temperature record is calculated and change their stance that their record showed cooling?

The correction was done in 2005 when the UAH dataset was not showing any cooling trend just no significant warming. Why are you lying Manny? Are you not used to anyone calling you out on your bull ?

[MannyIsGod]

So, there was no correction done to fix the record when it showed a cooling trend? Why didn't their subsequent papers show a cooling trend?

Do they still claim a cooling trend?

[Poptech]

Manny what happened to all your bull about Dr. Spencer stating mistakes in his papers and rescinding his conclusions?

[MannyIsGod]

I just showed you several mistakes and the admissions of those mistakes. Good lord.

I guess this is what you mean about your mental illness being beneficial. It allows you to just disregard reality. Carry on, Poptech.

[Poptech]

I pretty much just showed you several mistakes and the admissions of those mistakes. Good lord.

I guess this is what you mean about your mental illness being beneficial. It allows you to just disregard reality. Carry on, Poptech.

You failed to cite and quote Spencer stating mistakes in his papers and rescinding his conclusions.

What is the matter Manny can't support your bull ?

You got your ass handed to you again desperately trying to smear Dr. Spencer. Manny is now a confirmed liar.

[MannyIsGod]

Sure bud.

[Poptech]

Cite and quote Spencer stating mistakes in his papers and rescinding his conclusions.

You can do it Manny, back up your bull you liar.

[MannyIsGod]

Poptech. You exposed me. Good job.

[Poptech]

Cite and quote Spencer stating mistakes in his papers and rescinding his conclusions.

Come on liar.

[Yonivore]

Poptech. You exposed me. Good job.

So, how 'bout the rest of the list?

Are they, or Spencer for that matter, pseudoscientists?

[MannyIsGod]

I'm not repeating myself for you because you're too lazy to read the posts I make that already include the answer to your question, Yoni.

[Poptech]

Cite and quote Spencer stating mistakes in his papers and rescinding his conclusions.

Come on liar, surely you can quote Dr. Spencer rescinding the conclusions of his papers?

What I said stands, Spencer has refuted all criticisms of his papers or published a correction.

[Yonivore]

I'm not repeating myself for you because you're too lazy to read the posts I make that already include the answer to your question, Yoni.

So, what's wrong with sharing the positions of those on the list?

[RandomGuy]

So, are any of the people on the list pseudoscientists or not?

It's important because the premise of this long-ass thread is that people who don't believe in anthropogenic global climate change are relying on pseudoscience.

I see you ignored my request, as predicted.

You get the PopTech treatment.

"That is irrelevant to the irrefutable fact that I was referring to non-scientist hacks."

[Poptech]

Maybe RC can help out his lying friend Manny

[MannyIsGod]

So, what's wrong with sharing the positions of those on the list?

You can share the positions of those on the list all you want. Just because they're not psuedoscientists doesn't mean they're not wrong. Furthermore, the biggest problem here is with how you came to the conclusion that those on the list where right and why you came to that conclusion.

[MannyIsGod]

Maybe RC can help out his lying friend Manny

All the help in the world will not help me reach people who don't have open minds. Our exchange is there in plain view for all to see. Others can make up their minds out of which of us made the appropriate case.