Unless someone can show otherwise, afaik, there is no law, NCAA rule or contractual obligation stating that the SEC must wait based on threat of a lawsuit.
2. they could end up with a cash settlement
3. they could be simply wanting to fuck up the Aggies SEC celebration party that was scheduled this week.
Tell me why they should go ahead and give the consent to not sue.
The conference has a better chance of surviving if they let us go and keep the remaining 9 happy and attempt to add. Last week you were saying how the BIG12 will be just fine without A&M and how nobody cares
Now Baylor has a better chance of it surviving by threatning litigation? What happned to BYU? what a fuckin joke.
I thought we were just a minor piece of the puzzle.
And if/when they do show that damage has been done, they will have to prove A&M was responsible.
Hell, if UT, Tech, OU and OSU also bolt, there's no reason for Baylor to not sue all four of them either.
To keep the big 12 together... I thought you guys could go add BYU and never look back? At least that's what you were saying a week ago.
A&M is not staying.
Only one program doesn't see it that way apparently.
"If you would like tonight's goodnight in English, press one. For tonight's goodnight in Spanish, please pack your bags and leave the country. This is America, damn it." - Stephen Colbert
Are you fucking retarded Blake? Every minute they keep threatning litigation and make A&M linger around here is ultimately hurting the chances the big12 stays together.
I said if the Big XII added someone like BYU to replace A&M, then things should still be ok from a TV contract standpoint.
Problem now is that apparently OU doesn't like adding BYU to make 10 and worse adding teams like Air Force or Houston to make 12.
A&M is done in the Big 12. Period, no chance they are there next year.
Either explain how the Big 12's chances to stay together get hurt by making A&M linger around or simply ask questions to catch up with the rest of the group.
I was responding to the fact that threatening litigation would be the best chance for the big12 to stay together, it won't we are already gone... Letting us go quietly and working with Texas to keep OU and start adding programs would give the most likely chance for the big12 to stay together.
"Lert a&m go, they aren't important"
"texas holds the keys to the conference"
"we will just add notre dame, arkansas or byu"
"wait sec voted unanimously to accept a&m"
"threaten litigation quick, it's the only way for big12 to survive"
billyliucci Billy Liucci
Again, Texas A&M is O-U-T out...nothing BU does will change that. All that's happening is B12 stability becoming less likely by the hour
8 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
So about Aggy independence, how the fuck is that going to happen?
here is the quote from Ole Miss chancellor Dan Jones
Mississippi Chancellor Dr. Dan Jones said the SEC felt the Big 12 letter offered clear legal standing.
"We've been clear that we'd be happy to receive them if they're unfettered of obligations. We gathered to have a vote. We had a letter that clearly gave us legal clearance. It was frustrating to be gathered and then have things pulled out from under Texas A&M like that. We're disappointed for Texas A&M."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)