Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    Cracking down on repeat DWI offenders


    Since September, drivers in Texas found to have a blood-alcohol level nearly twice the legal limit of 0.08 can face a stiffer penalty.

    http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/loc...#ixzz1smeEDZbM

    =======



    How much would BigBooze spend to kill a campaign to reduce USA's level to 0.05?

    And are libertarians against regulating alcohol blood levels in vehicle drivers at all?

  2. #2
    2nd Verse Same as the 1st Oh, Gee!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,081
    None and no to answer your questions
    _____________________________
    I don't like most black people. There are very few who I have met that grew up in a cultural setting I have any respect for. Most I have met are out right thugs, and lack integrity. I could say I don't like black people, but there are some exceptions. If I based all my decisions on statistics, I would stay clear of blacks.

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    evidence? links?

    What's social/economic darwinist Randian Paul's position on regulations governing drivers' blood alcohol?

  4. #4
    controlador del universo
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    7,029
    my guess (unresearched) is that ron/rand paul would support equal penalties for a drunk causing an accident/death as a non-drunk, rather than policing the content of their blood...
    _____________________________
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!
    AwwWwWwWwWWW.....I thought it gonBE HE MAN!!!!!!

    [QUOTE=hemann82]
    [QUOTE=hemann82]watch this video[/QUOTE]

    [QUOTE=redzero]Watched the video[/QUOTE]

    [QUOTE=hemann82] watched a random youtube video because i told him to [/QUOTE]

    [QUOTE=redzero]Wait, is that what you are going with? It was two minutes long, so how is that some feat?[/QUOTE]

    [QUOTE=hemann82]/hemann [/QUOTE]

    [QUOTE=redzero] Well, when [B]one's[/B] desperate like [B]you [/B]are, [B]they'll[/B] resort to anything.[/QUOTE]

    [youtube]4SMDOq8645o[/youtube][/QUOTE]

  5. #5
    2nd Verse Same as the 1st Oh, Gee!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,081
    evidence? links?

    What's social/economic darwinist Randian Paul's position on regulations governing drivers' blood alcohol?
    you think ron paul wants to make legal drinking and driving?

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    RP wants to kill all kinds regulations, like kill the EPA, and trust corporations to self-police

    Why would he not expect drivers self-police their drinking?

  7. #7
    Veteran Sisk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    5,647
    Way to provide a really shitty map

  8. #8
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    trash talking a map?

  9. #9
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,049
    Fuck, I'm confident I can drive better at 2X .08 than Boushit can stone cold sober.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    2,683
    -No suitable public mass transit
    -Only legalized recreational drug is alcohol
    -FAIL

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    -designated drivers

    -taxis

    -Succeed is possible, but penalties are not sufficiently dissuasive.

    http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s1113.pdf

  12. #12
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Post Count
    36,102
    -No suitable public mass transit
    -Only legalized recreational drug is alcohol
    -FAIL
    -designated drivers

    -taxis


    -Succeed is possible, but penalties are not sufficiently dissuasive.

    http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s1113.pdf
    OMG....

    Grey, I have to agree with Bouton's over you on this one.

    That's pretty fucked up...

    Now I agree a strict 0.08% is dumb, but is there any good way to determine a level?

    I would like to be able to say don't worry about a level as long as someone can drive, but that gets difficult too.

    I know a Woman I dated 3 years ago who recently got a DUI. Her story is finny and sad at the same time. After getting frustrated with the cop who stopped her, she just told him to give her the breathalyzer, and she would blow a 0.16%. that was what she did too. She just knew it by her body weight and how much she drank. At least she impressed the cop in one way...

    Anyway, she was on her way to pick up a friend who called her because she drank too much. This girl at 0.16 can hold it well, and decided to go. Was stopped because she was weaving a little from texting.

    My God...

    As smart as she is, she sure was dumb that night.

    I told her if she needed help, to let me know.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 04-23-2012 at 07:59 AM.
    _____________________________
    I miss the 1/2 hr News hour...




  13. #13
    Just Right of Atilla the Hun Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    24,300
    And are libertarians against regulating alcohol blood levels in vehicle drivers at all?
    In short, yes; yes we are.
    _____________________________

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    23,518
    excellent.

    everybody SERIOUS knows self-regulation NEVER works.

    And if there's no law against drunk driving, then there can be no such crime, and no punishment.

    Just have your insurance company pay off liability for vehicular manslaughter.

    oops, I guess you Randians are against the "driver personal mandate" to buy insurance from a for-profit insurer?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •