Official Jim Fetzer 9/11 theory thread

[Blake]

Jim,

Can you please elaborate on how Silverstein became part of this equation?

How did he know in advance about 9/11 and how do you think he went about setting explosives up in the buildings? WTC7 in particular....

Thanks

[Blake]

Jim,

Can you please elaborate on how Silverstein became part of this equation?

How did he know in advance about 9/11 and how do you think he went about setting explosives up in the buildings? WTC7 in particular....

Thanks

[Blake]

I wrote Jim Fetzer.

Wait, now you think he is Jim Fetzer?

No.

You wrote him, he responded and you still don't think it's him?

That explains a lot.

[ChumpDumper]

Flight 93 crash site in Shanksville



(a) A Boeing 757 weighs about 100 tons with a wingspan of about 125′ and a tail that stands 44′ above the ground. It would have been overwhelmingly larger than the trucks in this photograph, where the alleged crater from the crash was situated. Compare this crash site with those from bona fide crash sites to begin to appreciate the enormity of the deception involved.

OK, compare it to a bona fide crash site where the plane hit the ground at a steep angle over 500 mph.

I'll wait for your links to those reports.

“This is the most errie thing”, the coroner observed at the scene. “I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.”



(b) The reporter for FOX News had similar observations, which I have also verified from the taped interview:

FOX News reporter: It looks like there’s nothing there, except for a hole in the ground.

Photographer Chris Konicki: Ah, basically that’s right. The only thing you can see from where we where, ah, was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees. We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but from where we could see it, there wasn’t much left.

Reporter: Any large pieces of debris at all?

Konicki: Na, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.

Reporter: Smoke? Fire?

Konicki: Nothing. It was absolutely quite. It was, uh, actually very quiet. Um, nothing going on down there. No smoke. No fire. Just a couple of people walking around. They looked like part of the NTSB crew walking around, looking at the pieces…” – FOX (09/11/01)

In all your investigation of similar crashes, how much large debris and blood would you expect to see? Again, give specific examples.

(c) An alleged eyewitness, Val McClatchey, who resides less than two miles from the purported crash site, claims to have taken a photo showing a plume of smoke from the crash site. Like the smoke coming from the series of dumpsters at the Pentagon, alas, there are good reasons to suspect that her photo was faked. The plume resembles those from detonation explosions more than it does fires from crash sites–and estimates of the location of the plume place it over a pond, which suggests that this is yet another fake photograph in the 9/11 inventory. Indeed, there are many good reasons to suspect that 9/11 was staged with Hollywood-style special effects.

You never addressed this and I suppose you never will:

And seriously, dan and Jim -- why would anyone go through the trouble of hijacking a plane with 40 people on board, NOT crash it, go to the site where you acted like it crashed, then spread out debris from that plane (that they had to hide and take apart and damage the parts) and the 40 people on it (including their presumably ground up body parts) in an area up to eight miles from the site -- just to let another government agency take photos of it and still others pick it up and collect it?

EPA photo gallery of debris all over the got damn place:

http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/e...padebris5.html

Explain to all of us how that is easier and more believable then just crashing the plane that they already had.

Also, you never admitted that the Shanksville site is a reclaimed strip mine. If you can't even admit you got a simple fact wrong, you aren't serious about the truth.

[Blake]

I guess Jim realized that this sub forum on a basketball message board is out of his league?

Disappointing, to be honest.

[ChumpDumper]

I wrote Jim Fetzer.

I have only ever posted under my own name. Here is our email exchange:

James Fetzer

4:07 PM (16 hours ago)

to [Nbadan]

Yes, it is. Probably not a great idea, since almost everyone there seems to have their minds made up. I wanted to share some of our major discoveries, but I don't have a lot to work with.

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:59 PM, [Nbadan] wrote:

There is a Jim Fetzer account on this message board whose owner is discussing 9/11 in the political forum and citing your articles. I just wanted to verify if this is you and if it is you, thank you for your participation.

Thank you for your attention.

I notice the brackets. If this wasn't you, dan -- what was his response to you?

[Winehole23]

Maybe Fetzer was dismayed at his crass and craven abandonment at the hands of Nbadan, his Spurstalk liaison.


(Internet celebrity crush gone wrong, ST * politics * edition?)

[Nbadan]

I know James Fetzer.....he is no Jim Fetzer..

[ChumpDumper]

I know James Fetzer.....he is no Jim Fetzer..

How do you know him?

[Nbadan]

That "crater" your crappy YouTube points out is nowhere close in size or position to the actual crash site. I need to remind you idiots that this was a strip mine and it hadn't been fully filled back in by 1994, when the aerial photo was taken

Your an ass hat...the crater pictures were from news reports on 9/11...the geological survey matches the dark scare perfectly...your gonna have to do better than that...

[ChumpDumper]

Your an ass hat...the crater pictures were from news reports on 9/11...the geological survey matches the dark scare perfectly...your gonna have to do better than that...

No, you didn't even look at the pictures -- otherwise you'd realize just how stupid you look right now.

Now, how do you know Jim Fetzer?

[Nbadan]

Looked at the pictures....did you look at the video of the smoking crater on 9/11...apparently not...

[ChumpDumper]

Looked at the pictures....did you look at the video of the smoking crater on 9/11...apparently not...

Yes. it's nowhere near the size or position of your "dark scare" -- look again.

And how do you know Jim Fetzer?

[Nbadan]

sure it is....even the wing scar marks are there...but not in your edited picture...

[ChumpDumper]

sure it is....even the wing scar marks are there...but not in your edited picture...

lol you didn't even look.

So how do you know Jim Fetzer?

[Nbadan]

Sure I did...so what? You didn't prove the video is misleading..

[ChumpDumper]

Sure I did...so what? You didn't prove the video is misleading..

Sure I did.

I know you would never admit to being wrong, so tell us how you know Jim Fetzer.

[Blake]

I wrote Jim Fetzer.

What email address did you use?

the ones in his articles..you can too...

lol

[Nbadan]

lol at you thinking this is James Fizer. We bust out laughing everytime you imply it's James Fitzer....what an asshat..

[ChumpDumper]

lol at you thinking this is James Fizer. We bust out laughing everytime you imply it's James Fitzer....what an asshat..

Why did you spell his name wrong twice?

It's Jim Fetzer.


How do you know Jim Fetzer? I'm interested to know.

[Blake]

lol at you thinking this is James Fizer. We bust out laughing everytime you imply it's James Fitzer....what an asshat..

Who is ”we”

[ChumpDumper]

Who is ”we”

dan, James Fizer and James Fitzer.

[Blake]

««« busting out laughing

[ChumpDumper]

Let's clear up this crash site thing once and for all, dan.

Download this picture, put it in mspaint and draw in where you think the crater photographed on 9/11 is.



You can then post it to imgur and show us all the results.

Give us the truth.

[Agloco]

dan, James Fizer and James Fitzer.

This thread is priceless.