It was witnessed by another manager.
It wasn't two in one year. Like I said, he's never been reprimanded about his addiction at work.
I still think they should have do ented his performance or alcohol/behavior issues or whatever
On top of that, he had been there for 10 years without a dent.
I say they are ing abusing him
It was witnessed by another manager.
It wasn't two in one year. Like I said, he's never been reprimanded about his addiction at work.
I guess US labour laws are cruel
No blemishes whatsoever.
does he have an employment contract? if not, isn't texas an "at will" state?
I'm not doubting you. I know how things work on here and that's why I asked if there's any people in HR in here before I posted the situation.
Employment contract? Don't know about the "at will" thing, either.
Yes we are, they really don't have to give us a reason why they fired us.
if he and the company have a personal employment contract, then he can have some room to succeed.
judy just said its "at will" state.
You think it has anything to do with him being gay?
he's been there for 10 years. did he just now start playing for the other team?
True, but maybe the management team reprimanding him is new?
Then I dont want to give you bad advice
Labour laws must be different here in Canada
I'll let Clambake do the work
he's not gay. I keed I keed!
But he didn't get fired, he just got demoted right? Does "at will" mean they can do anything to you while you are employed there, or just in matters of termination?
possible. or they just grew weary from his absences.
I'm thinking his extended absences is the culprit here
Only demoted. Not an outright termination BUT they were so kind to say they wouldn't contest his unemployment
judy said "at will", which means you can get fired for any reason or no reason.
you may think thats unfair. it isn't.
He was given their blessings both times. In fact, this time the VP and other manager who witnessed the VP tell my buddy his position and pay wouldn't be affected, encouraged him to go to rehab this time
I understand if that's how it is here in Texas. I just dont understand why they just didn't do that in the first place. Seems like they're being sneaky about it.
yea, I guess they could have just fired him, been done with it, and freed themselves of whatever problems he presented.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)