Splitter given 1 minute

[dylankerouac]

I would give up all the regular season records to have a chance for a title. There's no prize for best record in the regular season. Pop's been the best regular season coach since we got Duncan but the titles don't match up. He should have had at least 1 or 2 more during that span.

I hear ya. One can only hope that he too was able to learn from the experience and will make necessary adjustments to his own regular season coaching. I just noticed some important similarities if we can keep this core together:

2009-2010 Thunder out after first round
2010-2011 Thunder out after WCF
2011-2012 Thunder reach Finals

2010-2011 Spurs out after first round
2011-2012 Spurs out after WCF
2012-2013 Unwritten History

It's not like we can't beat the Thunder. We should continue to have a great shot next season. Role players are going to have to step-up and I think Tiago will need to become part of this teams identity and a force in some part of his offensive game and defensive game.

I think you were making some posts about needing a mid-range option in our game. I agree, that should be a strong option when players are run off the 3 point line. I know the whole point of the offense is to keep the ball movement and look for the best possible pass but in rare situations like the the OKC series, a drive and mid-range jumper should be a strong option especially when the paint is packed. Creating some space and a shooting a mid-range jumper may help keep the defense honest.

[Blake]

You conveniently avoided answering my questions.

Question 1: apparently everyone but you knows my answer is yes

Question 2: Others are simply making fun of you and the rest of the mustang krew

[silverblk mystix]

Question 1: apparently everyone but you knows my answer is yes

Question 2: Others are simply making fun of you and the rest of the mustang krew

#1) Lie

#2) You're still butthurt after your last humiliation-I understand.

[Blake]

#1) Lie

#2) You're still butthurt after your last humiliation-I understand.

1. Prove it

2. You hate Pop so much you are now sucking off Doc Rivers-I loled.

[silverblk mystix]

1. Prove it

2. You hate Pop so much you are now sucking off Doc Rivers-I loled.

you could be lol-ing at scotti brooks and lionel hollins edumacating Pop in a playoff series...

but that would probably make you cry-ol

[Blake]

you could be lol-ing at scotti brooks and lionel hollins edumacating Pop in a playoff series...

but that would probably make you cry-ol

except neither coach edumacated Pop.

Your crying about Pop is misguided and hilarious. Per the usual.

[silverblk mystix]

except neither coach edumacated Pop.

Your crying about Pop is misguided and hilarious. Per the usual.

If I had already stated that Pop was the spurs biggest obstacle to a title and it proved true, explain why you think I would be crying?

Keep supporting mediocrity as long as the spurs continue to be a "model" franchise.

Sheeple thinking.

[Blake]

If I had already stated that Pop was the spurs biggest obstacle to a title and it proved true, explain why you think I would be crying?

It wasn't proven true.

Butthurt is the only explanation I can come up with as to why you are crying that the Coach of the Year is the main reason the Spurs didn't win a title.

Sheeple thinking.

Oh look, another label.

[silverblk mystix]

It wasn't proven true.

Butthurt is the only explanation I can come up with as to why you are crying that the Coach of the Year is the main reason the Spurs didn't win a title.




Oh look, another label.

You are learning grasshopper!

[Blake]

You are learning grasshopper!

You are labeling, blind man!

I don't think you are learning from your teachings.

[silverblk mystix]

You are labeling, blind man!

I don't think you are learning from your teachings.

I have said nothing.

[Blake]

I have said nothing.

you've said quite a bit.

Why are you lying?

[silverblk mystix]

you've said quite a bit.

Why are you lying?

What is-is.

The rest is only opinion.

[Blake]

What is-is.

The rest is only opinion.

No, it's a clear fact you've said a lot.

Why are you lying about it?

[silverblk mystix]

No, it's a clear fact you've said a lot.

Why are you lying about it?

You couldn't understand it if it was in your face. Your preconceptions and your hate blind you.

[Blake]

You couldn't understand it if it was in your face. Your preconceptions and your hate blind you.

You can't even keep up with your own enlightened bullshit.

lol labels

[silverblk mystix]

You can't even keep up with your own enlightened bullshit.

lol labels

If you'd prefer to remain blind-I can't help you-no one can.

[Blake]

If you'd prefer to remain blind-I can't help you-no one can.

You're a hypocritical liar. I wouldn't want your help even if I needed it.

[silverblk mystix]

You're a hypocritical liar. I wouldn't want your help even if I needed it.

You would refuse help even if it helped you?

To use one of your words;

Neat.

[Blake]

You would refuse help even if it helped you?

To use one of your words;

Neat.

I wouldn't want your help.

I don't trust hypocrites and liars.

[silverblk mystix]

I wouldn't want your help.

I don't trust hypocrites and liars.

Here is a simple test for you;

When it comes to listening...or rather...being a GOOD listener, which is more important;

A) Listening to the person doing the talking

or

B) Listening to yourself

Simple. Just answer if you'd seriously like to learn a little bit today.

[silverblk mystix]

Closed mind.

Sad.

[Blake]

Closed mind.

Sad.

I didn't even answer. Solid listening effort on your part.

[silverblk mystix]

I didn't even answer. Solid listening effort on your part.

If you are afraid that I might teach you something-I understand.

[Blake]

If you are afraid that I might teach you something-I understand.

Did it dawn on you I might be busy at the moment. obviously not. You're a terrible communicator, but I'll play along because I bet it will end in you looking like a fool again.

although it depends on the situation, I still give A the edge in importance.

[BackHome]

Group Huggggggggggg...........

[Blake]

Group Huggggggggggg...........

Na, I don't generally hug liars and/or hypocrites.

[silverblk mystix]

Did it dawn on you I might be busy at the moment. obviously not. You're a terrible communicator, but I'll play along because I bet it will end in you looking like a fool again.

although it depends on the situation, I still give A the edge in importance.

Ok Fair Enough.

A- is the wrong answer but it is the answer most people would give because it is all they have been taught.

It is much, much more important to listen to yourself--or more accurately- your reactions while you are listening.

Imagine your brain is a computer. This computer has been fed instructions-programmed- so to speak. Your computer has a program for everything. So if, for example, you are talking to a female, wealthy, white, beautiful -redhead- your computer is filtering all these labels and you are pre-judging what you think you know about her based on these labels that your computer generated as soon as you saw her.

Before she even speaks, you are listening to these programmed labels about her-

When she starts speaking- you are hearing and reacting to these labels first- and you are reacting to that- again- before she even speaks.

She starts speaking and what she is saying is actually now a secondary priority -your pre-conditioning is the first priority- you can't even hear her sometimes through these labels.

It is important that you listen to her words also--but it is more important that you listen to your reactions to her words because if you are not careful --what you pre-determined about her will get in the way of what she is saying because you already decided beforehand what she was all about.

People do this all the time and they call it listening. They are not listening at all- they are just confirming or denying what they had already concluded about this person.

If these labels are negative in nature-do you think there is a chance that they will not hear the true meaning of her words?

If there is a predetermined hatred or a prejudice there-do you think it is possible to hear anything that this person says and actually understand it?

Vice-versa- if there is desire and longing for this person-do you think a person who is infatuated with her can ever hear what she is really saying?
Or is this person reacting to his desire and longing for her?

[Blake]

Ok Fair Enough.

A- is the wrong answer but it is the answer most people would give because it is all they have been taught.

It is much, much more important to listen to yourself--or more accurately- your reactions while you are listening.

Imagine your brain is a computer. This computer has been fed instructions-programmed- so to speak. Your computer has a program for everything. So if, for example, you are talking to a female, wealthy, white, beautiful -redhead- your computer is filtering all these labels and you are pre-judging what you think you know about her based on these labels that your computer generated as soon as you saw her.

Before she even speaks, you are listening to these programmed labels about her-

When she starts speaking- you are hearing and reacting to these labels first- and you are reacting to that- again- before she even speaks.

She starts speaking and what she is saying is actually now a secondary priority -your pre-conditioning is the first priority- you can't even hear her sometimes through these labels.

It is important that you listen to her words also--but it is more important that you listen to your reactions to her words because if you are not careful --what you pre-determined about her will get in the way of what she is saying because you already decided beforehand what she was all about.

People do this all the time and they call it listening. They are not listening at all- they are just confirming or denying what they had already concluded about this person.

If these labels are negative in nature-do you think there is a chance that they will not hear the true meaning of her words?

If there is a predetermined hatred or a prejudice there-do you think it is possible to hear anything that this person says and actually understand it?

Vice-versa- if there is desire and longing for this person-do you think a person who is infatuated with her can ever hear what she is really saying?
Or is this person reacting to his desire and longing for her?

Where are you getting this from?

[silverblk mystix]

Where are you getting this from?

Why?