Reply With Quote
So you admit to jumping to conclusions, and you also admit this thread was created with the purpose of launching a "little attack"...
Well done.
I see. The old "They did it first!" defense.
You might try to aim a bit higher.
So you admit to jumping to conclusions, and you also admit this thread was created with the purpose of launching a "little attack"...
Well done.
I do take the low road at times. So what? You are really being an ass at times for no reason. Are you trying to be lower.
One more thing.
Why the do so many of you turn these threads about me? Do I really get under your skin that much?
You admit to starting an "attack" thread with bull conclusions and you wonder why people end up calling you out on it?
" Do I really get under your skin that much?"
No. One of my many character faults is I just don't suffer fools very well.
Sop why are you looking like one?
Sop?
This thread is rich in vitamin I.
A link with the simple words, "run amok?"You admit to starting an "attack" thread with bull conclusions and you wonder why people end up calling you out on it?
Wow...
My intent is showing one more black mark on his administration and it's as if this is personal to some of you.
Just how sensitive are you guys?
Are you all saying what he did was kosher?
As far as looking like a fool...one of us started a faulty, deceitful thread. The other, didn't.
One of these things is not like the other one.
Words have meaning.
What he did was excusable from the facts revealed thus far.
lol @ black mark.
Now is not the time to double down on stupidity, WC.
Is it deceitful? "Wild or unruley..." is one definition of "run amok." When an article comes along with "felony hit and run," seems to me I could have been a whole lot harsher.
Was I demanding for him to be jailed or anything? NO!
"Another Obama Choice...run amok"
Please.
It seems to me you could have been a whole lot smarter.
Blame the messenger rather than address the news.
Lame...
You tried, feebly and with zero success, to spin the news to your worldview.
It was a stupid thing to do. That you don't have the stones to admit to your up is typical.
Lame indeed.
Why?
I see an interesting article, there are no good facts out yet. I apply two words that I didn't realize you would take so personal.
Do you often "Run Amok?"
Fleeing from the scene with others injured is still a felony. If you wish to latch on and attack me like a typical ankle biter, than all I can do is remind myself that some people have little better to do. I'm sorry for your boring life.
A couple words is spin?
I guess you don't give people enough credit to make up their own mind when they read a link.
He wasn't charged with a felony.
What you did was try to turn the tenor of the article into a criminal event besmirching the current administration. Your choice of the words "Run Amok".
You failed miserably. Myself and others called you on it. You started wriggling to get out of your failed attempt rather than say "I ed up."
lol ad hominem.
Words have meaning. Again.
ing cowardly....post something, get slapped, and then say "That's not what I meant!".
Can driving under the influence of a seizure be compared to "run amok," or not? Seems to me the synonyms work in this case.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
