Bingo.
If this disturbing video proves anything, it's how *fast* a routine encounter can turn deadly. The suspect drew and fired in a blink of an eye.
Police don't have time to wonder whether you're armed or not. If you don't follow their instructions, expect to be considered armed, and expect to be shot.
Even if everyone was a tip top athlete try doing that with a vest and pounds of gear on. This is just as impractical as saying Police should be trained to catch bullets with their teeth, but the good guys are always successful with in the movies right? I don't know why I even bother with reason and logic here...
so your response to "how should they proceed to detain people who aren't being complaint" is to detain less people?
lol
yep, their quota and gratuitous detainings, arrests, friskings. NYPD went on a slow down 90% fewer everything, and NY didn't fall apart. A lot of police work is just busy work
LOL. equating practical self defense with catching bullets in your teeth. Yeah...that's the same as disarming someone with a knife. smh
Just admit that is a dumb idea.
teaching cops to use non-lethal methods of self defense? why is that dumb to you?
LOL Double Eagle Flying Kick
You want me to do WHAT?
LOL Double Eagle Flying Kick
You want me to do WHAT?not saying I'm wrong tho
but just because that guy is fat doesn't mean that he should be able to shoot someone because he's too out of shape.
maybe don't hire so many fat ing cops. or at least just put em behind desks. sure don't put them up against the hood rats.
^ exactly. Fat cop can handle non-threatening white jackass.
But you're missing my entire point and just dodging the question. Let's say that cut arrests in half. Or even cut it to 5%
Even with those decreased numbers, my question stands. How you you think they should proceed to detain somebody who isn't being compliant
then they go into their standard brutality, choke holds, tasers, shoot 'em 10 times, at least, a full clip.
If they police really, truly put "to serve and protect" first, they'd also RE ING TREAT, like Wilson getting in his car and backing away from DEMON, GRUNTING ANIMAL BROWN, or that cop being "charged" by domestic-dispute lady with knife, running out of the house. Both Brown and the lady would be alive, but police NEVER retreat, they KILL first.
You still can't answer the question
How are you ever going to detain anybody if they aren't compliant? Retreating isn't getting you any closer to detainment
you still can't ing readYou still can't answer the question
How are you ever going to detain anybody if they aren't compliant? Retreating isn't getting you any closer to detainment
Florida PD uses mug shots of black men for target practice
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/16/flor...rget_practice/
You never answered how you think they should proceed to detain somebody who isn't compliant.
I did answer "then they go into their standard brutality, choke holds, tasers, shoot 'em 10 times, at least, a full clip. demon n!gg@s are hard to kill"
ok. so this is how you think officers should work? because that's what i'm asking.
I told you, go read
I left out a tactic: get him on the ground prone, hand-cuffed, and with 6+ of your fellow awful-cers, beat the out of non-compliant victim, kidneys first until they pee blood for days, head for concussions, brain damage, joints, and of coursr, how could I forget, the over-sized demon black genitals, etc.
good to know you agree with police behavior in the mike brown and eric garner cases
no, I disagree 100%, both murders were 100% avoidable, but Black Lives Don't Matter to the police.
those were cides, not murders
Garner was murdered. In my eyes at least. Yet some people deem choke-holding a man or shooting a man an efficient and necessary way to deal with somebody who 'isn't complying'.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
