**MNF Thread (NE @ CAR) sponsored by Tom Brady's retirement party (donation accepted)

[spurraider21]

Yeah Gronk wouldnt have caught that ball anyway



But what does the rule say? if the ball is still in the air, do you have to call pass interference ?

Because if it's the case, then they should have called it

its a judgement call. if the ball is deemed uncatchable, no flag

[Holden_Caulfield]

lol there is literally nothing a black qb can do to satisfy people on this forum

how about win that elusive superbowl

[thunderup]

Okay on second look, that was a PI.

Pats actually got the short end of the stick this time. , amazing, thought it was never possible.

[lefty]

its a judgement call. if the ball is deemed uncatchable, no flag

ah ok, thanks

[spurraider21]

how about win that elusive superbowl

hard to win a superbowl in november

[LakerHater]

[DPG21920]

I was so close to having the call of the year. It just came to me as I was sitting here. A bolt of lighting. Directly to my brain.

[spurraider21]

If Luck played the same game as Cam did today there would be a semen cloud about him on this forum tbh

[HarlemHeat37]

An uncatchable ball is a ball thrown way over a receiver's head or far to the side, etc..

That ball wasn't uncatchable, it would have taken Gronk like 2 steps to reach it..even if it was a bad throw, you can't just hold the receiver back and prevent him from making the play..

[DAF86]

Think of a player offside in soccer but is not affecting the play - the flag stays down.

Now whether or not the same can be said for the last play in this game, debatable.

The thing is when a player is offside on soccer that player always is unintentionaly offside. When a player interfers a rival on the NFL it's always on porpuse so that guy should be called for trying to cheat no matter how far away the ball ends up going, imho.

[Trill Clinton]

gronk couldn't and wouldn't catch that horrible ass pass. it was a INT the whole way, get over it!!! lol. it was just another attempt by the pats to force the refs to bail him out. thankfully, one of the refs said enough was enough and said pick that flag up.

[Trainwreck2100]

lol there is literally nothing a black qb can do to satisfy people on this forum

win without the refs i was ready to give Cam his props but then the Arefmative Action happened

[Holden_Caulfield]

hard to win a superbowl in november

you know what i meant

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Bil is crying like a little

[spurraider21]

An uncatchable ball is a ball thrown way over a receiver's head or far to the side, etc..

That ball wasn't uncatchable, it would have taken Gronk like 2 steps to reach it..even if it was a bad throw, you can't just hold the receiver back and prevent him from making the play..

yeah its a tough judgement call, and if the game was in Foxborough they wouldn't have picked the flag back up. was just explaining the rationale behind the no call.

[LakerHater]

gronk couldn't and wouldn't catch that horrible ass pass. it was a INT the whole way, get over it!!! lol. it was just another attempt by the pats to force the refs to bail him out. thankfully, one of the refs said enough was enough and said pick that flag up.

My man!

[spurraider21]

you know what i meant

you know what i meant too

[Clipper Nation]

Gotta hand it to , he finally stepped up against a good team when it counts, tbh.... loved seeing Brady get picked off to end the game

[Trainwreck2100]

An uncatchable ball is a ball thrown way over a receiver's head or far to the side, etc..

That ball wasn't uncatchable, it would have taken Gronk like 2 steps to reach it..even if it was a bad throw, you can't just hold the receiver back and prevent him from making the play..

exactly, if an INT just cancels out PI, then whenever a QB throws into double coverage then one guy could take out the receiver and the other guy pick it off.

[spurraider21]

exactly, if an INT just cancels out PI, then whenever a QB throws into double coverage then one guy could take out the receiver and the other guy pick it off.

it doesn't cancel

if that happened they would award the PI penalty at the spot and the INT wouldn't count

[Thebesteva]

[spurraider21]

[monosylab1k]

it doesn't cancel

if that happened they would award the PI penalty at the spot and the INT wouldn't count

lol not tonight apparently

[LakerHater]

[spurraider21]

lol not tonight apparently

there was no PI called tonight so obviously the scenario does not apply

the refs made a judgement call. you could definitely argue it was a botch, but they didn't deny the foul, they just deemed it uncatchable regardless of the foul. whether they were right or wrong is a different story