I'm all for it if the government would agree do the same to illegal immigrants. Tax dollars are tax dollars.
Bundy hasn't been charged with anything.
He lost several court hearings fair and square. His squatting is completely unjustified. He needs to pay up and get out.
This guy is no hero. He is a freeloader who is upset he may have to stop freeloading.
Your attempt to beatify him is laughable. Dude needs to find another place to graze cattle. Or do something else. It's not his land.
The dispute is not over his land. Quit making up.
No, you would still not be all for it.
He's been fined. That's an administrative penalty. Principle is the same.
If this guy wasn't part of the bigger story of other ranchers getting removed I'd be much more inclined to agree with you.
As it stands there is obviously another agenda going on. You just don't want to admit it.
You guys never have any evidence of a bigger agenda -- you just throw up some conspiracy innuendo and hope others take it as fact.
It pains him.
Reid, Reid, Kornze. Stop focusing exclusively on Bundy. You can not deny there is a bigger agenda, you are not naive.
He tried paying the fines to the state. They refused. How is that being "upset he may have to stop freeloading?" Oh wait, it isn't.
If they build a solar farm on the designated tortoise habitat, you may have something, but not really since the government can do with its land as it pleases.
It's not Bundy's land and nothing you have said has changed or will change that.
How about all the other ranchers being bought out with funds from their own grazing fees?
You just don't accept things unless a government press release tells you to.
Spell it out.
Give actual projects and exact locations. Otherwise, it's just your innuendo.
It's not the state's land.
It's the federal government's land.
He had been paying the federal government.
Now he is freeloading off the federal government.
The land is actually owned by the state, not the government. The government is issuing orders based on their court approved jurisdiction.
How about it?
You just don't accept things unless infowars tells you to.You just don't accept things unless a government press release tells you to.
God knows you won't believe anything Bundy says about it himself. But you're totally willing to swallow everything the government says about it hook line and sinker
Where there's smoke there's fire.
But mr. literal is incapable of reaching conclusions unless he is led there 100% of the way.
Yep. But somehow you're the one that is naive.
If that's true, it's managed by the BLM. I dont' see Nevada's disputing the BLM's control of the land.
Regardless, it isn't Bundy's.
Show me something that isn't innuendo.
That's all I ask.
This project did not exist 20 years ago when Bundy stopped paying his fees. Yet you are trying to go back in time to make it exactly about a solar project conspiracy.
I don't think its completely about a solar project.
Long term its probably about big ranches taking out small ones. Or the government just wanting the land for whatever use it wants.
Now you'll say where's the proof?
It's like asking for a memo that Bush started the Iraq war for anything but to free the Iraqi people and 9/11
Look into Whittemore (jailed for contributions to Reid) and Brightsource. Pull your head out of the sand.
Seems to be your guys fallback line these days. Only person that posted an infowars link was Fuzzy. I've provided plenty of reputable sources you choose to ignore tying these crooks together.
The government can do what it wants with that land.
It's not Bundy's.
Hey, more innuendo!
You're just like a twoofer.
You have failed to post anything but innuendo for anything having to do with this situation.
Dude didn't pay his fees for 20 years. Dude should get his cattle off the land that isn't his.
It's that simple and you are trying to make a grand conspiracy out of it.
Coincidence that nothing was really done up until now?
You wanted proof of a bigger agenda, I provided it.
I'll tell you again, stop focusing on only Bundy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote