Reply With Quote
damn. who the else could of shot him??
I'm sure Boutons will disagree...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jury-finds-...ry?id=25149665
damn. who the else could of shot him??
Glad for the guy even if he did shoot him. Strange though there was no gun found and no residue on him.
yeah the evidence was obviously lacking.
I would have killed the mother er in his shoes too. drunk drivers. I would have dragged him into my house and tortured him though for killing my two sons.
yep, I disagree, but vigilantism, esp among the hate-mongering Old Testament TX Baptists, is how low TX "civilization" stoops.
Banda should have been allowed his day in court, what if this was a result of Affluenza?
that , you kill two innocent kids you deserve to eat a .357 slug or two.
If Barajas were black ...
If Barajas were black IN HOUSTON! ...
TX is still the Old Testament/Wild West, revenge and guns rule!
1 less idiot tbh
On Banda's FB page his friends are saying he was the passenger and they know what really happened.
It doesn't sound like the cops had any real evidence that Barajas shot him. I thought this was interesting...
ANGLETON, Texas (AP) — A Texas father's claims he did not fatally shoot a drunken driver who caused an accident that killed his two sons seem to have received a boost from testimony by prosecution witnesses.
David Barajas (bah-RAH'-hahs) is on trial in the 2012 shooting death of Jose Banda. He is accused of shooting Banda near Alvin minutes after the intoxicated driver plowed into a vehicle Barajas and his two sons had been pushing along a rural road.
At Barajas' trial Wednesday in Angleton, an ex-deputy and a current deputy told jurors they failed to note in reports that more gunfire had taken place well after Banda was shot.
Banda's cousin later Wednesday gave contradictory testimony about whether Barajas had hit Banda before shooting him.
Alvin is 30 miles southeast of Houston.
He'll probably gonna have to fork off a lot of dough in the civil trial, but hey, he dodged jail...
I bet boutons would react similarly if both of his preteen sons were run down right in front of him
Driver would be part of the VRWC tbh
said in jest, but his inherently pussy nature would actually make this true
Of course, the Great Boutons would be extremely pissed, but because He has a REAL , he doesn't need to drive around carrying a fake-replacement- of a gun like you pussies.
If USA, or TX, would lower the limit to 0.04 or 0.05 with immediate loss of DL for 2 years at FIRST OFFENSE followed by 5 years of probation, then maybe there'd be less drunk drivers.
But all y'all's adored BigAlchohol corps block all attempts to lower the limit.
But you gun fellators and drunk drivers always miss the Big Picture, doncha?
BigAlcohol, BigTobacco, BigPharma gun fellating repugs I tell ya!!!!
pay attention, sonny boy, you might learn somethin to offset a tiny bit of your run-of-the-mill right-winger dumb edness
So you would have pistol whipped Banda with your mighty oak...
A terrifying picture emerges.
If the evidence is clear that he shot him then it's a bad decision. I thought vigilanteism was illegal?
no eyewitness, no gun, no residue, no confession. I understand the jury's decision. They can only base the verdict on the evidence, and this prosecution had none.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
