Reply With Quote
In b4 "evidence".
The only one your embarrassing is yourself. Answer the question, were you there when ape evolved to man?
In b4 "evidence".
Apes never evolved into Man... There was no chicken vs egg scenario.... You obviously don't understand evolution.
There was no Ape that suddenly gave birth to a "man,"
We are ALL apes.
I don't know how else to say it.
We had a common ancestor. The fossils prove it despite what your creationist "scientist" claim.
We HAVE the transitional fossils that prove it!!! It is irrefutable at this point!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lution_fossils
Ohh, but you want pretty much day by day fossils...... off.
Fossils of apes? Okay.
Did you know Theist couldn't differentiate between a human and an ape fossil when presented with pictures?
In fact, a leading "THEIST" Anthropologist said in one year it was definitely an ape, then 5 years later with the same skull said it was a human?
Most of the fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage.
You are just proving my point... What point have you proven besides my own?
We are direct ancestors...
And why do scientist like to combine ape and human like features? They don't know what those species really looked like.
Except that our DNA is pretty much exact... But forget all that...
Missing link, lol. In a few thousand years scientist will claim that dude was half man half ape.
Of course they'll give him ape and human like features just to fit into the theory.
Here's a question.... What happened to the Kangaroo's for Noah's arch? How about no mention of them.... or any of the other species on Australia?
In fact, if "GOD" was so powerful, why no mention of Australia at all?
I mean, if he was soooo ing uber to create the universe, you would think if he created this "Haven" he would know about Australia.
Never mind that.... if his "book" was sooo correct, there would not be different versions... If there was ONE perfect book, written or spoken by God, it would be unequivocally, unquestionably, the one true book.
No one would be able to question it.
Yet here we are, debating....
Different versions of the Bible?
Why would there be different versions?
Isn't it supposed to be the Word of God? Why would "God" have different versions?
Either he doesn't exist or he is a ing asshole trying to create conflict between his believers for his own amusement...
Either way, I wouldnt follow such an asshole.
What different versions are there? Different translations, sure.
Just to make sure I cover my basses, I now thought that you had a narrow mind as far as Christianity. Before hand I was referring in broad spectrum of all religions.... but let us narrow it down a bit for your sake....
Why dismiss the old testament?
I thought the word of god was infallible? So why a re-write?
Old Testament
New testament
I thought, in the christian faith, the word of god was infallible. So why the re-write?
If the New testament is the "New" gods way of seeing things, than it is not the same god. Unless you use circular reasoning which most theist do.
Last edited by phyzik; 07-27-2014 at 12:50 AM.
What do you mean by dismiss? Why don't Christians follow Mosaic law?
Dont misdirect the question now.... You asked what different versions there are....
I said Old testament and New testament...
Which one is correct?
Only one can be the word of God according to the faith.
It cant be both.... so which is it?
Then we can go from there....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
