Reply With Quote
The scoreboard is a fool!
I've got two schools.
The scoreboard is a fool!
I do wish ATM and Texas would have continued the Thanksgiving game till the sun expands.
That was a royal screwup. Initiated by Texas.
South Carolina has 14 returning starters on an 11-2 team, Oklahoma's 11-2 team has 16 starters returning. I see no logical reasoning in saying the Game s are better than the Sooners.
I'm not big on Trevor Knight, even after his stat filled bowl game. South Carolina's offense is going to be a nightmare for teams this year. 5th year senior taking over at QB who has big game experience under his belt and there o-line with mike davis in the backfield is going to be a nasty 1-2 punch with their passing game. They have some questions defensively but they always seem to have talent and depth on that side of the ball. I just think South Carolina is finally going to have a huge year.
Speaking of defensively the Sooners do have a couple studs there in DE Charles Tapper and LB Eric Striker. Other thn Mike Davis being the stud back I see no reason at all to think South Carolina will be better than Oklahoma. If you just like the Game s better....cool~~~~~~
Not sure how you have so much confidence in OU and why you act like it's some egregious prediction of mine. South Carolina has a 33-6 record the past three years compared to OU's 31-8. And USC plays in a tougher conference.
pac 12?
?
I'll bet you call the University if Tennessee, tu.
Tons of people call South Carolina USC and Tennessee UT. Not sure what you're getting at?
Yeah, but they're not the real USC.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan...go21-2010jan21USC Trojans beat South Carolina Game s in court
An appellate panel upholds a patent office decision that the 'USC' logo belongs to the University of Southern California.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Tuesday upheld a decision last year by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office review board to recognize the University of Southern California's century-old claim to the logo letters.
Neil C. Jones, the Greenville, S.C., lawyer representing the University of South Carolina, said school authorities hadn't yet decided whether to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Scott Edelman, an attorney representing the Los Angeles university, hailed the ruling as protection of the school's "primary athletic mark" used on team clothing and equipment that brings in significant revenue.
Sports logo registrations are not limited to use in team colors, so there was potential for South Carolina merchandise to be mistaken for that of USC, Edelman said.
He also suggested that the letters were more deservedly linked to the Trojans' warrior image than to "a goofy little chicken."
"I think they wanted to move away from the game logo," Edelman said of the school in the South. "Something that is totally understandable."
Jones said his "Southern manners" restrained him from responding to his courtroom compe or's comment.
Ok...? Cool.
LMAO if you can't appreciate the levity in those last few sentences.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan...go21-2010jan21USC Trojans beat South Carolina Game s in court
An appellate panel upholds a patent office decision that the 'USC' logo belongs to the University of Southern California.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Tuesday upheld a decision last year by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office review board to recognize the University of Southern California's century-old claim to the logo letters.
Neil C. Jones, the Greenville, S.C., lawyer representing the University of South Carolina, said school authorities hadn't yet decided whether to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Scott Edelman, an attorney representing the Los Angeles university, hailed the ruling as protection of the school's "primary athletic mark" used on team clothing and equipment that brings in significant revenue.
Sports logo registrations are not limited to use in team colors, so there was potential for South Carolina merchandise to be mistaken for that of USC, Edelman said.
He also suggested that the letters were more deservedly linked to the Trojans' warrior image than to "a goofy little chicken."
"I think they wanted to move away from the game logo," Edelman said of the school in the South. "Something that is totally understandable."
Jones said his "Southern manners" restrained him from responding to his courtroom compe or's comment.
Are you talking about which school has a better football team or legal team?
huh?
Historically, USC has had a much better football team. This year, we will have to wait and see.
Well if we look at the last 4 years Oklahoma 43-10 South Carolina 42-11.
The Sooners have beaten Alabama, FSU, Tex A&M, Stanford in the last five seasons. South Carolina not nearly as impressive.
A&M weren't any good when OU beat them and when A&M had Manziel/Sumlin, they destroyed OU. Okie St beat Stanford and how good were FSU when they lost to OU?
I grew up in the South and never heard anyone refer to South Carolina as USC. Now I did hear some people call Tennessee UT, but not nearly as much as Texas.
Well they refer to themselves as USC and I have been browsing the South Carolina forums throughout the summer so it just rubbed off i guess.
proof: http://www.gogame s.com/2014/08/0...c-network.html
At what point will aggy stop humping other SEC teams legs and start hating them?
Question to P5 fans: is it de rigueur to relentlessly pimp other teams in one's conference when one's own team has no chance of winning the conference?
Because I wanted to say something about Marshall's having a good quarterback.
Lol. I said I like South Carolina's team this year. Big12 fans are saying Oklahoma is better. There's no difference here.
I hope I'm wrong and we beat them.
Right.
Lol ok.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
