Evolution...?

[ChumpDumper]

I bring up why waste tiime on this over there also.

I;m playing this game with ya slick, I love music but have no idea how a CD is made, ok?

You don't know how science works at all, ok?

[Avante]

So much of this it's ridiculous.

[ChumpDumper]

So much of this it's ridiculous.

So many parts of one video.

Is this what you've sunk to?

[spurraider21]

So much of this it's ridiculous.

you've posted part 4, part 9, and now part 5.

why did you watch these out of order?

[Avante]

Hmmmmm?

In fact, the signs are strong that exactly that is happening, and that those who have ‘bought’ the big bang for its allegedly irrefutable science have been ‘sold a pup’. A bombs ‘Open Letter to the Scientific Community’ by 33 leading scientists has been published on the internet (www.cosmologystatement.org) and in New Scientist (Lerner, E., Bucking the big bang, New Scientist 182(2448)20, 22 May 2004). An article on www.rense.com led ‘Big bang theory busted by 33 top scientists’ (27 May 2004) says, ‘Our ideas about the history of the universe are dominated by big bang theory. But its dominance rests more on funding decisions than on the scientific method, according to Eric Lerner, mathematician Michael Ibison of Earthtech.org, and dozens of other scientists from around the world.’

[mouse]

Big Bang or no Big Bang you still can't produce DNA from exploding rocks.

[Avante]

you've posted part 4, part 9, and now part 5.

why did you watch these out of order?

Dude, what do you think about what is being said, well?

[ChumpDumper]

Hmmmmm?

In fact, the signs are strong that exactly that is happening, and that those who have ‘bought’ the big bang for its allegedly irrefutable science have been ‘sold a pup’. A bombs ‘Open Letter to the Scientific Community’ by 33 leading scientists has been published on the internet (www.cosmologystatement.org) and in New Scientist (Lerner, E., Bucking the big bang, New Scientist 182(2448)20, 22 May 2004). An article on www.rense.com led ‘Big bang theory busted by 33 top scientists’ (27 May 2004) says, ‘Our ideas about the history of the universe are dominated by big bang theory. But its dominance rests more on funding decisions than on the scientific method, according to Eric Lerner, mathematician Michael Ibison of Earthtech.org, and dozens of other scientists from around the world.’

rense.com

The conspiracy website?

crofl

http://www.cosmologystatement.org/ isn't even a working website -- proof positive you didn't even check.

lol busted

[Avante]

Big Bang or no Big Bang you still can't produce DNA from exploding rocks.

You nailed it mouse, and that's what I was saying, only an idiot would think...BIG BANG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....then...DNA.

[ChumpDumper]

Dude, what do you think about what is being said, well?

Tell us what they said in each of them.

Use your own words and explain each to us.

[Avante]

Once again.....why so much of this stuff?

[ChumpDumper]

Once again.....why so much of this stuff?

Because YouTubes without any peer reviewed supporting do entation is as lazy as you are.

Do you seriously think you are scoring points posting YouTubes you haven't seen and can't explain?

[spurraider21]

the electric universe

[spurraider21]

Because YouTubes without any peer reviewed supporting do entation is as lazy as you are.

Do you seriously think you are scoring points posting YouTubes you haven't seen and can't explain?

but there's ominous music in the background

[ChumpDumper]

the electric universe

lol thunderbolts.info

Another defunct website.

Seriously Avante, have you vetted any of this or is it just copypasta?

[Avante]

As We can see so many are thinking the same thing I am, the BIG BANG is actually the BIG BULL .

As these two losers try their best to.......those scientists way back when knew more than these modern scientists do today....hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ChumpDumper]

As We can see so many are thinking the same thing I am, the BIG BANG is actually the BIG BULL .

I just see a lot of people who aren't published scientists and can't pay their website registration renewals.

As these two losers try their best to.......those scientists way back when knew more than these modern scientists do today....hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Avante, just how old do you think the big bang theory is?

How old do you think creationism is?

Just answer these two questions.

[Avante]

What banged?" Sean Carroll, CalTech -Moore Center for Theoretical Cosmology & Physics

Several of the worlds leading astrophysicists believe there was no Big Bang that brought the universe and time into existence. Before the Big Bang, the standard theory assumes, there was no space, just nothing. Einstein merged the universe into a single en y: not space, not time, but spacetime.

[spurraider21]

so avante now likes science... as long as its not peer reviewed or generally authentic.

seems about right

[ChumpDumper]

What banged?" Sean Carroll, CalTech -Moore Center for Theoretical Cosmology & Physics

Several of the worlds leading astrophysicists believe there was no Big Bang that brought the universe and time into existence. Before the Big Bang, the standard theory assumes, there was no space, just nothing. Einstein merged the universe into a single en y: not space, not time, but spacetime.

lol this one certainly doesn't support intelligent design.

Of course, you didn't read it to find out.

You just keep ting all over yourself, Avante.

[Avante]

so avante now likes science... as long as its not peer reviewed or generally authentic.

seems about right

The bottom line is there are far far too many intelligent people that simply don't buy it. As you are seeing.

You do know there really was never an explosion ....right? Nothing ever went....BANG!....right?

[mouse]

I just see a lot of people who aren't published scientists and can't pay their website registration renewals.
.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/dic...g-bang-theory7.

http://www.inquisitr.com/1504854/big...doesnt-add-up/


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...-prove-it.html

[ChumpDumper]

The bottom line is there are far far too many intelligent people that simply don't buy it. As you are seeing.

I've seen one so far, and the theory he suggests is closer to a big bang than your creationism.

You do know there really was never an explosion ....right? Nothing ever went....BANG!....right?

You just said no one knows.

Why do you keep ting on own argument?

[spurraider21]

the big crunch model is cool, more poetic. futurama had a good spin on it. but the mechanics behind it are much harder to compensate for, considering the expansion is accelerating

[Avante]

lol thunderbolts.info

Another defunct website.

Seriously Avante, have you vetted any of this or is it just copypasta?

At what point does it dawn on you that you aren't wanted here? I don't even read you freak, ok? Dude, go away, go away....scram, go.......sheesh!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is this one sick or what, damn!