[QUOTE=Blake;7580985]BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...that's why I'm 0-3.
Starting this week I will, a system that almost doubles wins over losses.
Go ahead bet against Den/Sea/Niners/Cinncy/Indy ATS. Buck that 104-59.
Do you really think those five teams are going to go 2-3ATS most the time?
One more time...
Last two seasons ATS
Denver...23-13-2
Cinncy...20-13-1
Indy...22-13-2
Niners...23-14-2
Sea...27-11
You see that changing? I'm going to ignore that? In 2014....3-0-2
My bad, try.....115-64-7
Gonna love this, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Avante; 09-08-2014 at 04:03 PM.
how has the trends helped you so far this season?
Well I did say the trends say Oakland can't win on the east coast.....they can't!
The Browns haven't won in Pitt in over a decade.....still haven't.
Missed those two ATS...3.5 points.
so the trends helped you lose $300+? nice job got
Yep, the Steelers blew a 27-3 point lead and the Jets went for two instead of kicking the extra point.
Come on punk figure it out.
Only pussies whine about barely missing.
Scoreboard says 0-3.
Only a dummy totally ignores a 115-64 7 trend telling them that 0-3 will be short lived.
Why are you acting so stupid over..one...week? Do you realy think that little system won't work?
Dude, go to Google and check out those teams ATS history since 2012. What it's going to come to an end in 2014?
I mentioned I'm an expert at this, well now you'll see what I say that. I have everyone all into my plays....BOOM~!!!!
Raiders have won the last two meetings against Houston as they were both in Houston. Including just last season. surely you will take the raiders to cover at home
In the Dennis Allen era the Raiders are 13-18-1 vs the number. There is some reason to play that game? As a HF...2-4 as a HD 3-6-1. You see any reason to play that game?
The Raiders have lost their last seven games. The Texans do get out of the gate, going 2-0 the last 4 years. Are 1-0 right now.
in the dennis allen era we are 2-0 ATS and straight up against the texans... both of which were in Houston. the raiders are going to be home dogs. its a good "spot" don't you think?
No you're not, you played didn't play Houston in 2012. And last season you got 10.5 points.
No need to back the Raiders until they show something. Don't ignore the Texans as fast starters.
good correction there, we didn't play them in 2012. i was thinking of the 2011 "al davis" game.
we got 10.5 and ended up winning outright... on the road.
Yes but never use...one...of anything as some example. Anything can happen....once.
The Texans have went 8-0 the last 4 seasons in the first two weeks and are....5-2-1ATS.
You need more than just..."well we beat them last season".
what did you say your record would be if you go a whole season just playing home dogs?
I got caught up in a "spot" with my Jets play. Looking back....you never put $$$$ on Geno Smith...DUH!!!!!!!!
Another good one is...."why back a rookie QB?"
The last two seasons just taking every home dog.....89-87-3. Now if ya elimate the real sucky teams like Jax, 89-77-3.
The problem with that trend is that the good teams are never home dogs. So you want to look at winning teams as HF's and decent teams as HD's.
The best HD the last three years...Vikings-9-2 in that role. then there's the Colts..10-4. But their days as HD's about over.
Lol going on three years now of the same bull .
Experts don't cry " i should have used the systems".
Experts win. Period.
0-3.
You can always tell who the rookies are.
0-3.
And yet you are 0-3-1.
Are you finally admitting you were being stupid, then?
The Lions were an EASY pick. Which is why i took them in the pick-6 thread (I don't bet though so i have nothing to lose)
One of the problems with ATS trends is that just because i team was over/under-rated one year or multiple years does not mean they are the same right now.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)