2014 Avante Betting Tracker

[Avante]

[QUOTE=Blake;7580985]

Dude, I just showed you a 104-59 system, what I'm going to ignore it? Do you really think...Denver/Niners/Sea/Cinncy/Indy will lose more ATS plays than win? If I'd have used it last week..3-0-2.

but you didn't use it.

0-3.

BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...that's why I'm 0-3.

Starting this week I will, a system that almost doubles wins over losses.

Go ahead bet against Den/Sea/Niners/Cinncy/Indy ATS. Buck that 104-59.

Do you really think those five teams are going to go 2-3ATS most the time?

One more time...

Last two seasons ATS

Denver...23-13-2
Cinncy...20-13-1
Indy...22-13-2
Niners...23-14-2
Sea...27-11

You see that changing? I'm going to ignore that? In 2014....3-0-2

My bad, try.....115-64-7

Gonna love this, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[benefactor]

Thread should be good.

[Holden_Caulfield]

Suck a , ok?

yes I make the plays, that's why I know so much about trends. Trust me prick, $$$$$$ ...no problem.

how has the trends helped you so far this season?

[Avante]

how has the trends helped you so far this season?

Well I did say the trends say Oakland can't win on the east coast.....they can't!

The Browns haven't won in Pitt in over a decade.....still haven't.

Missed those two ATS...3.5 points.

[Holden_Caulfield]

Well I did say the trends say Oakland can't win on the east coast.....they can't!

The Browns haven't won in Pitt in over a decade.....still haven't.

Missed those two ATS...3.5 points.

so the trends helped you lose $300+? nice job got

[Avante]

so the trends helped you lose $300+? nice job got

Yep, the Steelers blew a 27-3 point lead and the Jets went for two instead of kicking the extra point.

Come on punk figure it out.

[Blake]

Yep, the Steelers blew a 27-3 point lead and the Jets went for two instead of kicking the extra point.

Come on punk figure it out.

Only pussies whine about barely missing.

Scoreboard says 0-3.

[Avante]

Only pussies whine about barely missing.

Scoreboard says 0-3.

Only a dummy totally ignores a 115-64 7 trend telling them that 0-3 will be short lived.

Why are you acting so stupid over..one...week? Do you realy think that little system won't work?

Dude, go to Google and check out those teams ATS history since 2012. What it's going to come to an end in 2014?

I mentioned I'm an expert at this, well now you'll see what I say that. I have everyone all into my plays....BOOM~!!!!

[spurraider21]

Raiders have won the last two meetings against Houston as they were both in Houston. Including just last season. surely you will take the raiders to cover at home

[Avante]

Raiders have won the last two meetings against Houston as they were both in Houston. Including just last season. surely you will take the raiders to cover at home

In the Dennis Allen era the Raiders are 13-18-1 vs the number. There is some reason to play that game? As a HF...2-4 as a HD 3-6-1. You see any reason to play that game?

The Raiders have lost their last seven games. The Texans do get out of the gate, going 2-0 the last 4 years. Are 1-0 right now.

[spurraider21]

In the Dennis Allen era the Raiders are 13-18-1 vs the number. There is some reason to play that game? As a HF...2-4 as a HD 3-6-1. You see any reason to play that game?

in the dennis allen era we are 2-0 ATS and straight up against the texans... both of which were in Houston. the raiders are going to be home dogs. its a good "spot" don't you think?

[Avante]

in the dennis allen era we are 2-0 ATS against the texans... both of which were in Houston. the raiders are going to be home dogs. its a good "spot" don't you think?

No you're not, you played didn't play Houston in 2012. And last season you got 10.5 points.

No need to back the Raiders until they show something. Don't ignore the Texans as fast starters.

[spurraider21]

No your not, you played didn't play Houston in 2012. And last season you got 10.5 points.

No need to back the Raiders until they show something.

good correction there, we didn't play them in 2012. i was thinking of the 2011 "al davis" game.

we got 10.5 and ended up winning outright... on the road.

[Avante]

good correction there, we didn't play them in 2012. i was thinking of the 2011 "al davis" game.

we got 10.5 and ended up winning outright... on the road.

Yes but never use...one...of anything as some example. Anything can happen....once.

The Texans have went 8-0 the last 4 seasons in the first two weeks and are....5-2-1ATS.

You need more than just..."well we beat them last season".

[spurraider21]

what did you say your record would be if you go a whole season just playing home dogs?

[Avante]

Yes but never use...one...of anything as some example. Anything can happen....once.

The Texans have went 8-0 the last 4 seasons in the first two weeks and are....5-2-1ATS.

You need more than just..."well we beat them last season".

I got caught up in a "spot" with my Jets play. Looking back....you never put $$$$ on Geno Smith...DUH!!!!!!!!

Another good one is...."why back a rookie QB?"

[Avante]

what did you say your record would be if you go a whole season just playing home dogs?

The last two seasons just taking every home dog.....89-87-3. Now if ya elimate the real sucky teams like Jax, 89-77-3.

The problem with that trend is that the good teams are never home dogs. So you want to look at winning teams as HF's and decent teams as HD's.

The best HD the last three years...Vikings-9-2 in that role. then there's the Colts..10-4. But their days as HD's about over.

[Blake]

Only a dummy totally ignores a 115-64 7 trend telling them that 0-3 will be short lived.

Why are you acting so stupid over..one...week? Do you realy think that little system won't work?

Dude, go to Google and check out those teams ATS history since 2012. What it's going to come to an end in 2014?

I mentioned I'm an expert at this, well now you'll see what I say that. I have everyone all into my plays....BOOM~!!!!

Lol going on three years now of the same bull .

Experts don't cry " i should have used the systems".

Experts win. Period.

0-3.

[Blake]

I got caught up in a "spot" with my Jets play. Looking back....you never put $$$$ on Geno Smith...DUH!!!!!!!!

"

You can always tell who the rookies are.

0-3.

[Aztecfan03]

Little man, I just showed everyone what happens when ya play...Denver/Seattle/Niners/Cinncy/Indy. What's that tell you?

Those five are already...3-0-2

Why act like I was way out there with my plays? I could easily be 3-1, and it gets easier as the season progresses.

Dude, there is nothing I don't know about this, as you will see. This is no different that my South Carolina loss, everyone,...."you dumb blah***"...then 44-2. ......crickets!

*** most also took South Carolina...hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Niners since Harbaugh arrived......33-19-2ATS
Seahawks since RW arrived....27-11
Denver since Peyton arrived....22-13-2
Indy since Luck arrived....22-13-2

why not just play those four? If you had of you'd gone...104-56-6

And yet you are 0-3-1.

[spurraider21]

he was about to take the Giants too

[Holden_Caulfield]

even i went 2-2 this week

[Aztecfan03]

I got caught up in a "spot" with my Jets play. Looking back....you never put $$$$ on Geno Smith...DUH!!!!!!!!

Another good one is...."why back a rookie QB?"

Are you finally admitting you were being stupid, then?

[Aztecfan03]

he was about to take the Giants too

The Lions were an EASY pick. Which is why i took them in the pick-6 thread (I don't bet though so i have nothing to lose)

[Aztecfan03]

One of the problems with ATS trends is that just because i team was over/under-rated one year or multiple years does not mean they are the same right now.