Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 73 of 73
  1. #51
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    You hear alot of . Seek help.

  2. #52
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    I don't know man, he spun it into a $10 million deal four years ago tbh.
    Sarah Palin spun her moment in the sun into $10-20 million.

  3. #53
    Veteran velik_m's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    7,118
    Who's dumber - the presidents or the people who elected them and then re-elected them?

  4. #54
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,288
    Who's dumber - the presidents or the people who elected them and then re-elected them?
    the re-elections have been the most mind boggling aspect of recent presidential history. i mean at least in 04 the economy was doing well and people were making money (of course it was all fools gold, but still)

  5. #55
    Take the fcking keys away baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    93,371
    Sarah Palin spun her moment in the sun into $10-20 million.
    Word. Being cunty pays well these days.

  6. #56
    Take the fcking keys away baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    93,371
    Who's dumber - the presidents or the people who elected them and then re-elected them?
    The president isn't dumb, he's evil. The people aren't dumb, there is no real choice in American elections.

  7. #57
    Veteran vy65's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    8,004
    The president isn't dumb, he's evil. The people aren't dumb, there is no real choice in American elections.

  8. #58
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    144,696
    Hey vy65

    I listened to a few minutes of this video you posted.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yIXXnz9xy0

    This guy believes terrorists hyjacked the planes and flew into the towers. Check out the info that proves the government did it and that there were no terrorists.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post7584413

    This is probably the main reason they went into Afganistan.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=lithium

    Of course the invasion of Iraq was about oil and Iraq's selling its oil for euros instead of dollars.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/iraq-na...rished/5375905
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=+iraq+oil+euro

    The idea that terrorists committed the attacks has been debunked as clearly as the idea that the sun revolves around the earth has; people simply haven't seen the proof. The government did it so that the people would support their wars mistakenly thinking they were the good guys.
    lol

    No, it's not clear at all. For instance Neither you nor anyone else has proposed a complete theory for the events of 9/11. If you have one, post it in your own words.

  9. #59
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    144,696
    This video gives a complete story.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

    Here are some plausible motivations for their having done it.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=lithium
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=+iraq+oil+euro
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/iraq-na...rished/5375905

    How can you say there's no complete story with a straight face?
    Because there isn't.

    You can't even explain a fill theory when you are called out.

    I'm calling you out again.

    State your full theory without linking some stupid YouTube or conspiracy site.

  10. #60
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    21,219
    Just so you know Bill Clinton had an SAT score of 1032.
    I sincerely doubt that. Where did you find that number?

  11. #61
    ... scanry's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,951
    I sincerely doubt that. Where did you find that number?
    Look it up. Standardized tests don't measure everything. A lot of people have gotten into Stanford Business School (arguably the best business school on the planet) with a low 600 GMAT score.

  12. #62
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    21,219
    Look it up. Standardized tests don't measure everything. A lot of people have gotten into Stanford Business School (arguably the best business school on the planet) with a low 600 GMAT score.
    I agree they don't measure everything, but they are generally a decent indicator of one's ap ude.

    I'm sure some people get into Stanford Business school with a low GMAT score, but it's probably because English is their second or third language or they have some other extremely desirable attribute or set of attributes (including possibly race/economic background/etc.)

  13. #63
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    8,845
    Look it up. Standardized tests don't measure everything. A lot of people have gotten into Stanford Business School (arguably the best business school on the planet) with a low 600 GMAT score.
    Isn't it Wharton?

  14. #64
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    8,845
    I sincerely doubt that. Where did you find that number?
    I didn't believe it either, at first. But apparently, it's true.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...regrading.html

  15. #65
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    I didn't believe it either, at first. But apparently, it's true.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...regrading.html
    Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Rhodes_Scholars

  16. #66
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Who's dumber - the presidents or the people who elected them and then re-elected them?
    I hurt for America...

  17. #67
    ... scanry's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,951
    Isn't it Wharton?
    Stanford is a better business school than Wharton tbh. In fact GSB is the hardest school to crack in the US.

  18. #68
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    8,845
    He most likely got it because of all his leadership positions in Georgetown, not because of his academic ap ude.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •