Reply With Quote
Not entirely sure he's gonna come back, especially if he leads the league in rushing. Some team will max him out, and RB isn't really a position the Cowboys should invest max money in.
similar to basketball records when a player shoots more/less in wins/losses, sometimes its not clear which is the cause and which is the effect...
often times a rb gets a lot of carries because they're already leading and they're just grinding clock. however in yesterday's case it was clear. the game was always within a possession and the seahawks held a lead for a while, but for some reason they refused to keep lynch involved. the cowboys didnt make the same mistake
Not entirely sure he's gonna come back, especially if he leads the league in rushing. Some team will max him out, and RB isn't really a position the Cowboys should invest max money in.
What spurraider21 said.
Also, you're referring to the past (prior to now, and up until Lynch is gone). We do not know how the roster will look on the offensive side of the ball and what will be done to bolster it from a weapons stand point.
Struggle Wilson has thrown 6 game ending interceptions in his career yet nobody will mention those.
you just did
So have a lot of other really good QBs.
Last edited by Spur-Addict; 10-13-2014 at 02:13 PM.
Ok, I'll play.
I said you wouldn't be able to afford the type of team he has around him now. That doesn't include just "big name" players.
Your posts also seem to suggest that your team will be static for the coming years, while as we both know, that's not true. Then you go on to change the conversation to drafting, which even by best the GMs, can be a gamble and is never a for sure thing.
Can the shehawks manage to put together a good football team? Yes. But, it's certainly going to be a lot harder after you overpay struggle wilson. Which, by the way, was the whole ing point of the conversation.
You do know the vast majority of the team was either drafted by us, or undrafted FA's right? So although you may correct in draft dependence, their formula goes way beyond just drafting, it's a model of player regardless of perceived skill by the rest of the league. Seattle finds value where others see trash. So with that in mind, the people that are so hung up on depth should rethink that a little bit. My posts suggest just that, not that the team will remain static. Only the stalwarts will outside of injury.Ok, I'll play.
I said you wouldn't be able to afford the type of team he has around him now. That doesn't include just "big name" players.
Your posts also seem to suggest that your team will be static for the coming years, while as we both know, that's not true. Then you go on to change the conversation to drafting, which even by best the GMs, can be a gamble and is never a for sure thing.
Can the shehawks manage to put together a good football team? Yes. But, it's certainly going to be a lot harder after you overpay struggle wilson. Which, by the way, was the whole ing point of the conversation.
Will Wilsons contract restrict depth? Absolutely. Will it be as extreme as what everyone seems to believe? Absolutely not.
The only player I'm concerned about losing is K.J Wright.
i think there is no way harvin gets paid as much as he is right now..
He's locked up until the end of 2017. Two whole seasons after this year away, so that's quite a ways a away. And two seasons under Wilsons new contract if he gets paid this offseason. He'll be 29 at the end of that deal. I'm not concerned about that at all actually.
esp if they keep improving det line
So, lose to the Cowboys and turn around and trade Harvin for table scraps?
This move is troubling.
I'm baffled?
I know he missed most of last season when they were great, but just two games ago he scored three TDs in a game. Granted, all were called back, but he's dynamic.
I know they aren't giving up, but with thaeir running game no longer dominant and Tate gone, they are putting a lot of responsibility on Wilson while giving him lackluster talent.
It really is a strange move. He must have pissed someone off or something, tbh. lol Did the Cowboys the shehawks so hard that now they're questioning themselves?
I don't think Harvin was a great fit at WR for the Hawks. It's just weird to see them trade him so quickly after giving him a new deal. It's like the Bucs and Revis, though at least Seattle got some value back.
Calm down the Cowboys didn't anyone hard. The calendar beckons though...December is nigh.
Dude you are a big ed genious
Wilson brought em back though
He's been the best running back on their team this year, tbh.Wilson brought em back though
So what exactly are you saying about Skittles?He's been the best running back on their team this year, tbh.
ty performance from the D--how much do we miss Chris Clemons and Red Bryant? No inside push creates no disruption...no playoffs if we keep playing like this. Only saving grace was watching the 49ers get raped on National Tele...but even that is a hollow reprieve. Spur-Addict our ship is not sailing right
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
