it makes no sense.
IF we accept your premise that humans must be "designed"... then the fact that we exists must mean that there is a designer.
Hey it's our residential Darwin groupie. Yo tlongII you have any more cool links of eyeless fossils of sperms found by another university looking for more Government funding?
it makes no sense.
IF we accept your premise that humans must be "designed"... then the fact that we exists must mean that there is a designer.
And your point?
my point is that you don't follow simple logic. your premise that we must have been "designed" requires a designer. yet you routinely avoid saying that there is a designer
Are you saying I don't have the right to do so?
i didn't say that.
but as long as you know you are being illogical, you'll understand why you aren't being taken seriously
So I need to say what you want me to say in order to be taken seriously.?
you need to be logical for me to take you seriously
if you are going to say humans were designed, but then you aren't going to say there is a designer... then you aren't being logical
Sure, you have the right to disregard the dictionary definition of design that us English speakers use.
But it's dumb.
Actually it's your point. But if you comb your hair right and wear a hat no one will notice.
Explains why you never take your hat off.
Thanks for the heads up.
Who is the designer? How did he/she/it do it? If you've got no evidence, then it's not Science.
i think he's a nutjob. he's a "freelance researcher" with zero credentials to make any of his claims. this is why his work is considered pseudoscience. he's also a religious nut which surely clouds his judgment
World’s Oldest Engraving Upends Theory of sapiensUniqueness
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...ns-uniqueness/
Did someone say random?
Let me say you are insane.
Gets to the crux of it, donnit?
You only know what "designed" is by comparing it to something that isn't designed.
What would life that wasn't designed look like?
we have a theory of origin of species, and the only thing you have to really accept is that offspring share the genes of the parent. It really is just that simple.
If what you say is true then we should have millions of transitional fossils after all it took "Billions" of years to go from soup to Man where are the fossils?
And how do you get a Universe from nothing?
You don't have to support Creation just because you realized Darwin was full of .
your smarter thank that.
You ever see a pea up close, how do you get all those colors and patterns from random DNA?
name the fish that became a Bear.
how do you get a starfish from a random explosion?
Until you can answer these questions truthfully you will never understand Design it has nothing to do with a God.
open your eyes...
cmon mouse you cant sit on both sides of the fence
Transitional fossils are all there. Pea s colors are not from "random" DNA.
Stop asking me for evidence you won't look at, and don't care to learn about. It's insulting.
Your links are a proven waste of time, especially since you so actively ignore everyone elses.
This video by UFOvideo.com
You are in- ing-sane.
No one buys your "faked moon landing theory". No one. There is a reasonf for that. You have no credibility. none. zero. zilch. nada.
The fact that you weigh in on a thread like this though, is funny.
Don't let these uneducated salad tossers try and "Censor" you Cosmored.
This is still America were your right to say something is respected.
Or until Google,YouTube,or a Web master steps in.
Sent from my iPhone
Last edited by mouse; 01-10-2015 at 09:00 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)