The Ferguson Indictment (on Justice)

[ChumpDumper]

So, let's try again, without all the coy back and forth. This is what started this asinine exchange.


To which you interjected,



To which I attempted to check my understanding of what you were suggesting

And, it went downhill from there.

If you're sincerely asking if Michael Brown was shot from 150 feet away; the answer is no and, to my knowledge, no one has ever suggested that.

If you're sincerely asking if Officer Wilson pursued Brown for 150 feet, before the altercation that resulted in his shooting took place, the answer appears to be yes (as suggested by witness statements corroborated by forensic evidence at the scene). It appears Officer Wilson made it about 150 feet from his patrol vehicle and Michael Brown made it another 20 feet beyond that before the final sequence of events that resulted in his death began.

Again, why are you unable to discern these facts on your own?

Just as easy to ask you.

Thanks again.

[spurraider21]

The testimony said he did.

I believe it.

so what are you getting at?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Just as easy to ask you.

Thanks again.

Now that you've read the witness testimonies do you think Wilson was justified in using deadly force?

[rogues]

Yonivore just eurostepping s, tbh..

[Yonivore]

Yonivore just eurostepping s, tbh..

What does that even mean?

[Ignignokt]

Chump read no testimonies, since first of all he says it was THE testimony, which if he's literate and not a subhuman it implies one testimony. There was actually multiple testimonies in court, but that just illustrates he's a moron.

Furthermore, no evidence proved MB was shot from 150 ft. The evidence proves differently as well as the testimony of 10 witnesses who were african american that confirmed officer wilson's testimony.

Don't argue further until he actually addresses the court's mulitple TESTIMONIES and actual evidence. Other wise he's claiming shallow victory over a material fact that no one denied. 150 ft? say's what? That he was shot from 150 ft, or that he was pursued 150ft? 150 ft wihtout context says . 150 ft could be the length of the total s chump takes yearly. Doesn't indict Officer Wilson or exonerate him.

cliff notes:
Chumpdumper once again brings no argument and claims myopic internet victories despite proving he's an ignoramus.

[rogues]

What does that even mean?

A eurostep, my ..a eurostep..

[Ignignokt]

A eurostep, my ..a eurostep..

it's a compliment.

[ChumpDumper]

I claimed no victory.

You seem upset by my mere presence though.

[Yonivore]

A eurostep, my ..a eurostep..

Well, that helped ... not. But, thanks for the effort.

[Yonivore]

it's a compliment.

Again, thanks, I think.

[Yonivore]

I claimed no victory.

You seem upset by my mere presence though.

You're just annoying, Chump. Nothing we won't get through, though.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump read no testimonies, since first of all he says it was THE testimony, which if he's literate and not a subhuman it implies one testimony. There was actually multiple testimonies in court, but that just illustrates he's a moron.

Furthermore, no evidence proved MB was shot from 150 ft. The evidence proves differently as well as the testimony of 10 witnesses who were african american that confirmed officer wilson's testimony.

Don't argue further until he actually addresses the court's mulitple TESTIMONIES and actual evidence. Other wise he's claiming shallow victory over a material fact that no one denied. 150 ft? say's what? That he was shot from 150 ft, or that he was pursued 150ft? 150 ft wihtout context says . 150 ft could be the length of the total s chump takes yearly. Doesn't indict Officer Wilson or exonerate him.

cliff notes:
Chumpdumper once again brings no argument and claims myopic internet victories despite proving he's an ignoramus.

Argue further?

There was no argument.

I asked some questions.

You really seem upset.

[ChumpDumper]

You're just annoying, Chump. Nothing we won't get through, though.

Eh, you're all just bristling when I post.

It's kind of funny actually.

[ChumpDumper]

Now that you've read the witness testimonies do you think Wilson was justified in using deadly force?

Legally I'm sure there are plenty of reasons to shoot a guy.

In this case? Maybe there was a different way of going about it, maybe not.

[spurraider21]

[TheSanityAnnex]

Legally I'm sure there are plenty of reasons to shoot a guy.

In this case? Maybe there was a different way of going about it, maybe not.

In your opinion was Wilson justified in using deadly force, yes or no?

[Yonivore]

Eh, you're all just bristling when I post.

It's kind of funny actually.

Bristling? No. But, I agree, it is funny that anyone gives you any attention. Some day, we'll learn, I suppose.

In the meantime, glad to amuse.

[Ignignokt]

Legally I'm sure there are plenty of reasons to shoot a guy.

In this case? Maybe there was a different way of going about it, maybe not.

Did the evidence support that officer wilson was shot from 150 ft?

[DarrinS]

Meh, just another case to put on Sharpton's sad resume.

[ChumpDumper]

In your opinion was Wilson justified in using deadly force, yes or no?

Legally, according to the applicable laws and regulations?

Sure, one can always find a reason.

I will allow for the possibility it could have been handled another way, but that's all conjecture.

Did the evidence support that officer wilson was shot from 150 ft?

Who made that claim?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Legally, according to the applicable laws and regulations?

Sure, one can always find a reason.

I will allow for the possibility it could have been handled another way, but that's all conjecture.

What other option did Wilson have after Brown punched him, tried to disarm him, and charged him?

[spurraider21]

What other option did Wilson have after Brown punched him, tried to disarm him, and charged him?

He could have asked nicely.

[ChumpDumper]

What other option did Wilson have after Brown punched him, tried to disarm him, and charged him?

Dunno for sure.

I just said I allow for the possibility.

I can't ask anyone to prove a negative in saying there were no other options so I'm cool with it.

[spurraider21]

Legally, according to the applicable laws and regulations?

no. i'm sure he was referring to inapplicable laws and regulations.