Reply With Quote
UFC 182 - Jon vs Daniel
Cry Havoc 5-0 1.000
Ace3g 4-1 .800
txstr1986 4-1 .800
thistle 4-1 .800
Dbreiden83080 3-2 .600
Technique 2-3 .400
polandprzem 3-3 .500
The TroutBum 1-4 .200
Congrats to 2014 winner
1. polandprzem 92-36 .719
2. Ace3g 77-34 .694
3. txstr1986 95-52 .646
4. The TroutBum 75-44 .630
---------------------------------
jimo2305 7-4 .636
Djohn14 3-2 .600
Dbreiden83080 28-19 .596
Cry Havoc 11-11 .500
We will start 2015 with bombastic fight between Bones and DC on January 3rd !
Minimum 4 picks and maximum 6 for each event to make the prediction count.
At least 3 need to be from the Main Card
All fight picks are made in the fight threads themselves
Results are tallied up and we use a % to determine the winner. Minimum of 80 fight picks for a whole season to qualify as the winner..
Thank you and good luck you all
UFC 182 - Jon vs Daniel
Cry Havoc 5-0 1.000
Ace3g 4-1 .800
txstr1986 4-1 .800
thistle 4-1 .800
Dbreiden83080 3-2 .600
Technique 2-3 .400
polandprzem 3-3 .500
The TroutBum 1-4 .200
Take that, es!
Congrats, Pole-Smoker... I'm gunning for you this season. (Starting now. Last night was, uh, just me giving you a head start because I feel bad about your face.)
Thank you, you are really so kind.
I've been waiting for my equal for so long, please be that guy ....:
Hey 3-3 to start a year is not that great. Still IMO ace and tx are favorites and I wanto just to hold on to them as close as possible
I can't believe that Benson loss will count.
UFC Siver vs Ireland
Cry Havoc 5-0 1.000
thistle 8-1 .889
Ace3g 7-2 .778
txstr1986 7-2 .778
Dbreiden83080 5-4 .555
polandprzem 6-5 .545
Technique 2-3 .400
The TroutBum 3-6 .333
--------------
4-0 thistle
3-1 ace, tx
3-2 pole
2-2 db/trout
Last edited by dbreiden83080; 01-19-2015 at 04:20 PM.
Should be 3-2..
Tibau
Uriah
Conor
Really?
There was no Uriah- Tayor fight, but maybe I was looking the wrong way during the fight?
I was picking Uriah no matter what dude.. Change it..Really?
There was no Uriah- Tayor fight, but maybe I was looking the wrong way during the fight?
how could I make your prediction count on a fight that did not happened?
So if I do this
McGregor
Hall
Tibau
Wade
Like Thiste it will count?? His counts just by putting the name there.. Could be Uriah Hall versus Bigfoot as long as it doesn't say bigfoot he's good..
nope - since we knew the opponent for hall at the time and it was on the thread I made it a valid prediction. If he made it earlier I would not count it as well.
You picked Hall to win against Taylor for sakes
0-0..nope - since we knew the opponent for hall at the time and it was on the thread I made it a valid prediction. If he made it earlier I would not count it as well.
You picked Hall to win against Taylor for sakes
You can't count a pick that didn't happen right?? They all fought nobody..
Holly crapp you such a whiner
We knew who the opponents were in the time he was making predictions. You made a prediction on a fight that never happened!
You see the difference or not?
Do you read your posts in the fight threads? Especially of late..
None of those fights happened with no foe there to be seen..
See....
No problem I will just keep editing it back in..
Your reaction to Jones/DC
And again last night with Conor..
I actually agree with Pole-Smoker.
really?Your reaction to Jones/DC
And again last night with Conor..
haha
you better then that dude
----
I would like other posters to voice their opinion
-- Trout just spoke
My feeling is this.. Crazy happens in MMA with guys pulling out so we may not have the time or remember to go back and change a pick. But I never changed the pick in terms of who I thought would win.. Now if Uriah had to fight Weidman last minute and he lost I would not be saying to not count the loss either.. I bolded the name.. If he wins count it and if he loses count it..
Yea but we predicting who will win the fight between two fighters that signed to fight each other.
It always was that way, and I always counted that way. Where there were changing in opponents I just did not counted the fight, the whole time when I'm doing this, I'm doing it this way and IMO it's fair.
This is so obvious to me and you are making it personal. I just wonder why?
Yea but we predicting who will win the fight between two fighters that signed to fight each other.
It always was that way, and I always counted that way. Where there were changing in opponents I just did not counted the fight, the whole time when I'm doing this, I'm doing it this way and IMO it's fair.
This is so obvious to me and you are making it personal. I just wonder why?
Fine i'll change it back..
WTF in the World?
I agree with DB on this one - I think it should count even if the opponent changed. It's not like he would've changed his pick when a no-name replaces Hall's opponent at the last minute.
Would he, would he not
My next prediction very well could look like this
fighter A - fighter B
fighter A - fighterB
They I will say that fighter A in all the cases were winners and I meant to pick them. Sounds fair to me.
Funny I can tell
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
