Reply With Quote
It is funny that the village idiot of all people was the one to call you out.
And that proves nothing.
It is funny that the village idiot of all people was the one to call you out.
He'll have to turn over his server to prove it.
at least give us independent verification. Any dip can fill in a spreadsheet in 6 hours.
Almost 260,000 in sales today. Pretty good considering how flooded the market has been.
hopefully it damges the piece of enough to ruin her chances at the presidency.
Fabricated outrage, works again
Repug governance, nasty
what do u sell
Hillary Clinton has ‘devil’s horns’ on latest TIME coverthe new times cover...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/hillary-clinton-has-devils-horns-on-latest-time-cover/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
.... will prove to the the evangelical Bible humping End Timer Losers that HRC is the devil.
All they need now is to see her with can of Monster Energy drink:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bntfUA6TmLs
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-13-2015 at 06:01 AM.
green gold
Produce broker? That's a really interesting business. I have some friends in the game.
Not a broker, I sell to brokers. Grower, packer, shipper. Most fun I've ever had working, basically dealing perishable stocks. Sales team of four did a smidge over 100,000,00 last year.
New York Times undercuts its own Hillary email obsession
In the 10 days since its initial story on Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email account during her time as secretary of state, the New York Times has run dozens of pieces on the subject. You might have thought they'd hit every possible angle, but on Friday they did something novel and unexpected:
journalism that opens the question of whether this is quite the story they've made it out to be. Or whether it's a Hillary Clinton story at all.One thing that's gotten buried in all of the breathless reporting about how shocking and unprecedented it is that Clinton used a personal email account for work is that it wasn't against the rules.
If you paid really close attention, you might pick that information out of the ninth or twelfth paragraph of any given story, but it wasn't the impression the coverage was designed to leave. And even now, in an article running through the lack of rules about how federal agencies save and store emails and the wide array of ways different agencies deal with that, we get this:
“The wiggle room for Mrs. Clinton is that those policies didn’t come into play until after she was gone” from the State Department in early 2013, said Thomas S. Blanton, the director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University, an independent, nongovernmental organization focused on transparency.
"Wiggle room"? Wiggle room is how we describe minor technicalities.
I'd say that the lack of a policy governing how you handle this situation is something beyond wiggle room, unless Blanton has information about time travel somehow playing a role in the Clinton email saga.
Federal rules on saving official emails should be clarified, though email poses major challenges—I mean, do you save the umpteenth email rescheduling a meeting? The log-in info for a webinar you're going to struggle to focus on and mostly wish would just have been sent as a set of detailed instructions? But that's a really, really different story than what the Timesand other outlets have been reporting about Hillary Clinton's email.
And yet what it boils down to is that the policies in place during her time as secretary of state were vague and allowed a lot of personal discretion, that the laws have changed since she left the government, and that
Republicans and reporters alike want to suggest that because she sent official emails from the same account, they have a right to see her personal emails. It's nuts, and yet it's been a media obsession for 10 days and counting.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/0...28Daily+Kos%29
aka, MSM and right-wing hate media fabricating a scandal to increase traffic
Read yesterday that a security company found out her server was unprotected the first two months it was up.
What region/produce do you specialize in? My friends are general brokers but also Colorado potato specialists. That's a really interesting and profitable business to be in.
CA avocados. And then import from Mexico, Peru, and Chile when CA isn't in season.
Nice...how is the water situation affecting the biz? Is it as bad as I read?
Are we going to see you on an HEB commercial? "Hi, I'm Sanity and I'm your local HEB produce department!"
Water situation is really bad. Tons of people turning water off or stumping and planting wine grapes. Lot of water with too much salt as well causing root rot.Nice...how is the water situation affecting the biz? Is it as bad as I read?
Are we going to see you on an HEB commercial? "Hi, I'm Sanity and I'm your local HEB produce department!"
They are always in season at my house. Well not quite, but I have 3 different types in my back yard and they all produce at different times.
Was talking only Hass. We pack and sell green skins, fuertes, reeds, pinkertons, eddingers etc throughout the year but they are such a small part of the total crop. I'm not a big fan of them really, to watery for me.
Pusher how long you been in the industry? Do you enjoy it as much as I do?
Watch out. You greedy capitalists are gonna make Boo REALLY jealous.
I wouldn't really consider myself in the industry. I'm in IT for one of your customersProduce is particularly challenging from my perspective, especially when it comes to maintaining data integrity. Too many vendors. Too many variations. Too many pack sizes. Too much seasonality. Difficult to forecast demand with all these variables.
The produce buyers are a different breed for sure.
Any experience with Costco's retail link program?I wouldn't really consider myself in the industry. I'm in IT for one of your customers
The produce buyers are a different breed for sure.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
