As if any gamer is going to be happy with the performance of that ty onboard chip anyway.
http://hexus.net/tech/news/cpu/81883...775c-i5-5675c/
Who gives a about integrated graphics on an unlocked CPU? I'd never trade 2MB of cache and 700MHz of clockspeed for Iris Pro graphics. Fuk yo 65W clown.
As if any gamer is going to be happy with the performance of that ty onboard chip anyway.
No wonder this bull got delayed a year. Sickening that they're following in line with AMD and their stupid APUs.
It seems this line of CPUs are for small netbooks.
Lets wait till we see real Desktop CPUs
Those are the LGA 1150 Broadwell chips... allegedly.
oi baseline bum why u always upgrading pc parts?
u game or a programmer?
my 4960x is bottlenecking the dual an Zs.
are u gaming on a 4k screen? or anything higher resolution 1080?
dont tell me u s all this money to plan on a TN panel...
1280x1024
Never trust a broad
Also..
this clown actually thinks you built that quad an SLI rig..
It wasn't quad an, it was only dual an Z. Thing was a piece of anyways, I got like 15% GPU usage tbh.
u also the clown that spend 10k+ on t hat new powermac 2nd half last year?
Last good Apple was Apple II tbh
Apparently Broadwell chips are only about $25 more than their Haswell equivalents, and Iris Pro 6200 looks good enough to be a temporary gaming solution for someone who can't afford a new i5 and a new video card at the same time. You couldn't say that about HD 4600, as it couldn't really play new games at 720p even, but Iris Pro looks like it can do any game at 720p and some AAA games at 1080p too. So I withdraw my scoff of Broadwell. From benchmarks I have seen, the missing L3 cache doesn't seem to hurt it vs Haswell.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)