Reply With Quote
Not much you can do with that lineup, tbh. The fact that this game was compe ive and went to OT is an achievement for ATL in itself.
Not much you can do with that lineup, tbh. The fact that this game was compe ive and went to OT is an achievement for ATL in itself.
No, his advice was to let Lebron average a triple double... Oh no, wait, that was just Leonard's trash ass defense
this gif
39%
Hit the gym Ernesto.
..
Bud should've at least learned how to be a to sideline reporters or at post-game press conferences like Pop.
Pop learn him softness...
Or the fact that Jeff Teague didn't come up clutch because he overdribbled and couldn't create on the last play. Oh wait, that doesn't play into the narrative that Teague is better than Parker...never mind, it was all Bud's fault!
Teague > Parker tbh
We'll be here all day if we start listing the point guards that are better than the French got. The list of point guards that are WORSE than Parker is much shorter. So far I got Zack Lavine.
You're going to be here all day ing no matter what.
Their similarities are pretty funny, the system really is phenomenal:
2015 Teague in the playoffs: 20.6 PER, 57% TS on a 26% usage rate, .166 WS/48, 1.8 BPM(5th on the team), 2.1 VORP(5th on the team), 7.1 APG
2013 peak Parker in the playoffs: 21.5 PER, 52% TS on a 29% usage rate, .152 WS/48, 2.8 BPM(tied for 4th on the team), 0.8 VORP(3rd on the team), 7.0 APG
Teague has played in 1 less round, to be fair, although his supporting cast is much weaker, especially with the injuries..Parker is a slightly better player, overall, realistically, but the system really does wonders..
eh at least Lavine can dunk tbh
Probably Rondo, only 1 off the top of my head, tbh..
No one really doubts the system , aka. Tim Duncan, helps guards. But that same system isn't making Cory Joseph an all star. If you can't understand why Tony Parker is a historically great pg then your either dumb or trolling.
Smart bb people know exactly what share of Parker's successes were systems based and which weren't. The system you want to implicate in the success of Tony sure let him down an awful lot. Lmao nice work with the head I win, trail you lose argument.
Historically great PG? Wow..wow..
If we're only listing French players, sure, he's historically great
not many point guards have final mvp awards in their closest and voted in the top 5 in regular season mvp
What happened to this guy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Gibson
I feel bad for calling him historically great, because some of y'all are too dumb to take the long view, but it's the truth. Guys like Malone and nash, marbury, peja, are all some historically great guys too. And they are losers. Elite NBA losers. Parker is nowhere near a top 100 player but it doesn't matter. He is a top 5 pg for his era and most people can remember more than 20 players, especially when aided by TV clips of awesome highlights.
Y'all losers are way to focused on hate. no matter how hard you want to change history, you can't. Even Kobe is now underrated. I never thought i'd see the day but so it is.
History = remembered for decades.
Parker was the public alpha of the team for a five year period. No one cares that we didn't win a championship in that period. Y'alls standards are too high.
Kind of surprising. Wasn't expecting Bud to choke that badly. You can't win 1 game.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
