Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    This is some good honest journalism and it's definitely worth sharing. So far I think its already up to 6 parts, here is the first one.

    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/...ies/in/8397382

    The Drive to FBS for Texas State once held an endless gleam of promise for the students and Associated Student Government that kicked off the move by raising student fees to improve facilities and athletics overall.Eight years later, and that sense of promise has given way to a gritty sense of realism and unease among many Bobcats.
    Results on the field suggest that the Texas State Bobcats can at least hold their own in the Sun Belt, if not impress. The Bobcats finished second behind South Alabama in the all-sport 2014-2015 Bubas Cup, and no sport seems to be in way over its head in the 'Belt at the moment. However, Bobcat fans have also noticed a general lack of dominance in most sports and a relative dearth of championship hardware, as only Volleyball in 2013 and Women's Indoor Track and Field in 2014 have accounted for Texas State's Sun Belt les.
    In addition to the relative lack of trophies, the collective ego of Bobcat fans has been bruised by two bowl snubs as well as the forces of conference realignment leaving them without a reliable in-state rival and seemingly at the bottom of the totem pole in Texas in terms of brand image. In the Game of Thrones-esque blood feud that is FBS football in the state of Texas, image is everything, and the Bobcats have little to work with.
    Even with those snubs, both wins and recruiting have seen a steady uptick for the football team from 2012 to 2014, and collective fan confidence in the coaching staff appears to be improving from an initial level of skepticism. So there are certainly reasons to get excited about Texas State football, and there's still a bright future to sell.
    Yet a common complaint stemming from those image-conscious concerns gets lodged on a consistent basis by many fans: that the people in charge of promoting, improving, and selling Texas State's brand aren't doing enough.
    Our spotlight will thus be focused away from the field, on the men and women in Texas State's athletic department. We'll specifically look at those paid to enthusiastically and responsibly promote the Bobcat brand, and how their work can either positively or negatively impact Texas State's profile among fans and the media.
    Many Bobcat fans have often perceived an unresponsive and out of touch athletic department and an Athletic Director that does only the bare minimum to promote the school. Other fans and often athletics officials bristle at what they see as a spoiled and negative group of supporters that hurts their efforts to grow the Bobcat fanbase.
    So who's right? Can this gap in communication be bridged, and can Texas State finally spring to the level of prominence everyone dreamed of in the Drive to FBS? And why are all of these off-the-field minutiae important?
    By the end of this series, we'll address all those questions and more, and perhaps determine some ways for Texas State to improve its image along the way.

  2. #2
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    Article #2
    Texas State Football's Iden y Crisis

    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/...ion/in/8397382

  3. #3
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    76,235
    It really is crazy that lol utsa started up a football program and proceeded to sprint right past Texas State.

    And I think an extremely huge part of that is the attractiveness of playing in San Antonio and the alamodome for bigger programs like Arizona, ASU, Okie St etc

  4. #4
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    It really is crazy that lol utsa started up a football program and proceeded to sprint right past Texas State.

    And I think an extremely huge part of that is the attractiveness of playing in San Antonio and the alamodome for bigger programs like Arizona, ASU, Okie St etc
    More of the fault can be put on the athletic administration than the attractiveness of San Antonio itself. We've have 100 year old football program that failed to capture the market a long, long time ago.

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    Article#3 "Ignoring History and Easy Opportunities"
    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/...ies/in/8397382


    Article#4 "Media Island"
    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/...ory/in/8397382

  6. #6
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    Post Count
    15,822
    As a South Alabama alum, I think TSU has done a solid job overall. They missed a bowl bid, but only because the Jags won the head to head tiebreaker, plus the bowl game was in Montgomery, AL. But overall, they're doing well in the conference and can compete with anyone.

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    As a South Alabama alum, I think TSU has done a solid job overall.
    Pelicans78, the appropriate and correct acronym for Texas State is TXST.

  8. #8
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    Post Count
    15,822
    Pelicans78, the appropriate and correct acronym for Texas State is TXST.
    You're right. TSU is Texas Southern. My bad.

  9. #9
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    Article #5 "TXST Media Relations

    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/7/7/8818803/texas-state-athletics-relations-with-the-media/in/8397382


    One of the more annoying tendencies us sports journalists and bloggers tend to have as a profession is to get really, really whiny whenever we don't get what we want. We're certainly not the most sympathetic figures, we can be insufferably self important, and frankly, when it comes to most athletic departments, we can be a real pain in the ass.Still, embracing--or at least tolerating--the media and new media in particular is a necessary evil if you want to maximize publicity for your program. An FBS upstart like Texas State especially needs all the help it can get when it comes to getting their name out there, and the negative consequences of not doing so can cause serious headaches (see: Florida International). But Texas State might not fully understand this concept yet.
    Sports Information Department and Self-Promotion

    Some of the internal blame by athletics department employees on Texas State's lack of exposure was focused on the Sports Information Department, which is tasked more with handling the day-to-day minutiae of media coverage and self-promoting that many seem to think marketing is responsible for.
    Our SID is not putting in any effort into making it easy for media to cover us.
    Rumors about Texas State's lack of outreach have long persisted within the local media community, with reporters from various outlets alleging stories filed long past deadline times (or not at all) and occasionally unresponsive Sports Information officials. Pregame and postgame stories littered with typos on Texas State's website were often a problem during the Southland Conference and WAC years, although that aspect has improved as of late.
    The department, which is comprised of a director and three assistants, receives meager resources. The 2014 fiscal year budget reports that the Sports Information Department was given only $233,733 to work with.
    Despite the lack of overall resources, internal sources blamed the group for not doing the little things that can be done at minimal cost to enhance the school's profile. For example, it's easy for upload content that can be shared with local media, which can be useful in situations where a media outlet might not have the resources to send, say, a photographer to a game. Many schools do this, but Texas State does not.
    Tyler Mayforth, the former beat writer for Texas State sports at the San Marcos Record, mentioned that covering the Bobcats wasn't always an easy task during his time in San Marcos:
    As petty as it seems, the little things matter to media. A decent media room, stats on time, working WiFi at stadiums, things like that.
    They cleared out a storage closet to hold basketball post game press conferences for about four years before they moved to the weight room and finally the old Strutters office. Got kind of cozy in that closet — and gave visiting media a good chuckle — but TXST had to use what it had.
    Regardless, when you're paid to do your work and love what you do (like I do with journalism and I did really enjoy covering Texas State for the most part), you push a lot of that out of your mind. But every little bit helps.
    Texas State has moved basketball press conferences to a more roomy setting since then, but by Mayforth's account the department may have been ironing basic kinks out as recently as 2014.
    However, other journalists from traditional media outlets disputed that Sports Information was making things hard for them.
    "I'd have to say by and large we have good relationships with them and they are doing a good job."
    -Source from a regional newspaper
    Jack Albrecht of Texas State Rivals.com affiliate BobcatReport also mentioned that he has a good relationship with Sports Information, but that the department's hands were tied when it came to issuing credentials because of policies handed down from the top.
    Whether Sports Information has good relations with the media or not depends on who you ask. In the past it's been a fairly uneasy relationship, especially with local media. Yet it's possible that things within the Sports Information Department have improved dramatically within the past year. Assistant SID Jen Lawson was lauded for essentially re-writing the entire softball record book on her own initiative to make it more media-friendly, for example.
    Another refreshing improvement out of Sports Information was when a frustrated supporter e-mailed the SID about the Mager and Mayo stories flying under the radar, and to his credit head SID Rick Poulter responded in an informative and professional manner.
    Mayforth also did offer a bit of a mea culpa and accountability on his part when it came to those stories:
    I kicked myself when those stories came out about Mager, Mayo and a little bit earlier, Joplo Bartu, because I was in good with those guys and never asked the proper question to get them to open up about it.
    While I laud what the SEC is doing this year at media days (bringing one student-athlete with a 'human-interest story' per school) and hope more conferences and universities follow suit, it's on the media to ask the questions to get those angles.
    That's fair. Exchanging information is a two way street, after all.
    It's reassuring to see that the SID learned from this experience and will purportedly do a better job of finding and promoting these stories in the future. Our sources also suggested there's an internal movement to better embrace social media within the SID. However, as previously mentioned it's disappointing that there hasn't been a concerted effort to make these stories further known to potential donors as a way to get involved with the (it should be said, vastly improved) Bobcat Club donor organization. Hopefully that will be a priority in the future for the whole athletic department to improve upon.
    Although certain parts of the athletic department seem to be learning from their past experiences on improving coverage, some policies that come from the top may be hindering Texas State's ability to maximize their coverage.
    Behind the Times

    Magazines, message boards, recruiting sites, and blogs don't always have the reach that a tv station or a newspaper does, nor do they provide much of a filter by comparison, but they're becoming an increasingly important and personalized way of reaching fans and alumni in different markets. However, Texas State has been largely su ious or openly dismissive of non-traditional media throughout its history. The tone on relations between the athletic department and new media was set during athletic director Larry Teis's embarrassing public spat with prominent Texas State fan site BobcatFans.com back in 2007.
    "We've had recruits sit across here and asked about that Web site," Teis said. "They've thought about not even coming on a recruiting trip because everything's so negative."
    According to Teis, fan message boards need to contribute to the team in a quantifiable way.

    "Those (message boards) don't do anybody any good unless they're out raising money or selling tickets or promoting," Teis said.
    It's unfortunate that Teis blithely dismissed an entire community of dedicated if occasionally unhinged die hard Bobcat fans rather than view the site as a potential tool and opportunity for further publicity. The claim that recruits would seemingly dismiss Texas State because of a few disgruntled message board posters also stretches credibility since every other school has negative fans on social media and message boards.
    It would've taken some work, patience, and the ability to listen rather than lecture to get people to come around on Bobcatfans and other message boards, but even though Teis didn't view outreach to that segment of the fanbase as a good investment of his athletic department's time and resources, he still would've been better off ignoring them instead of picking a fight.
    BobcatFans eventually did get press credentials after being established as a magazine that was too big to ignore, but Rivals.com affiliate BobcatReport experienced issues with getting credentials despite being a main source of recruiting, program information and mostly positive coverage. They did receive credentials for one year after being the main source for conference realignment information during the dissolution of the WAC, but a collapse in previous site leadership and an ongoing su ion of new media has made them persona non grata once again in the Casey Building.
    Jack Albrecht doesn't mince words when it comes to Texas State's rejection of new media.
    We are a nothing, a non-en y, in the eyes of the Texas State athletic department, despite the fact that our very existence strengthens the football program. BobcatReport maintains an excellent relationship with the vast majority of recruits we contact. I could ignore offers and the kids that receive them, for instance, but that would be a disservice to the coaching staff and disrespectful of the time they put into recruiting these young athletes.
    Instead we feed the beast on their behalf and get the shaft, because at the end of the day, we aren't around to please the athletic department. We provide a subscription based model centered around the needs of our members and desire to stay on top of things related to Bobcat football. I know the coaches appreciate us. It's pretty tough to run a pay site when the athletic department decides you don't exist.

    There is specific verbiage on the Texas State sports information website pertaining to sites like ours. "Fan-based Web sites containing at least one or more of the following: chat rooms, message boards, recruiting information, scouting reports and links to news sites, as well as other fan-based features are not issued credentials." I don't have a problem with BobcatReport being termed a "fan-based web site" and since a big part of what we do is provide recruiting information, so be it.
    I've attempted to reach out before and introduce myself to people in the Texas State athletic department. No answer was received. I let it go. After all, their own policy is that we're not media and might think we're crazed fans for all I know.
    Other publishers on our network have asked me about the lack of a relationship with the athletic department. They find our normal to be bizarre. At this point, it's something I just don't care about anymore.
    A bit of backstory for context -- BobcatReport fell into a state of disrepair under former owner Brent Thibodeaux and Jack has only within the past couple of months worked to revitalize it, so it stands to reason that they won't have a lot of leverage with the athletic department anyway. Also, that fan site credential policy was first displayed back in 2010 and there are questions as to how much of it is still in effect now. However, it was still displayed on the Sports Information page of the Texas State athletics website when this article was written.
    Scout.com affiliate BobcatIllustrated wouldn't comment about their relations with the athletic department, but conversations with media and athletic department sources appear to confirm that Larry Teis's anti-new media decree is fairly universal.
    Having games on ESPN2, ESPNU, and ESPNNEWS is certainly a major step in establishing an FBS-level media presence, but it's clear that Texas State is also leaving plenty of potential positive publicity on the table in other mediums.
    Those quotes from Albrecht and Mayforth are troubling, but ultimately Texas State does have the right to set media policies as they see fit. But if they're going to insist on tightly controlling the flow of information and access to the program, then they need to do an outstanding job of marketing themselves to the fans in order to keep people interested. As we've already mentioned, that hasn't happened.
    We'll take a closer look into the inner workings of the Texas State athletic department in our next article.

  10. #10
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132

  12. #12

  13. #13
    Believe.
    My Team
    Texas State Bobcats
    Post Count
    132
    Article #10 Establishing an Iden y
    Best quote "It's time for all of that to stop. It's time to relentlessly tell the world about our story, our potential, and then take their damn lunch money"

    http://www.underdogdynasty.com/2015/7/10/8628845/how-texas-state-athletics-can-improve-its-image

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •