Reply With Quote
Libertarianism in Action: Clippers_deux rails against reproductive rights.
Dude is so enraged he can't tell the difference between buying and selling.
Libertarianism in Action: Clippers_deux rails against reproductive rights.
CROFL why do straight up conservative types try to claim they are libertarian in the first place?
Do they think it's edgy?
I'm surprised conservatives aren't praising this woman for noting a market deficiency and capitalizing on it. "What? They were just going to throw them away anyways!..."
It's hard for me to imagine how people can rationalize abortion itself.
It's the exact excerpt from the ad that was quoted in the article.
Keep deflecting.
Irresponsible women should have their tubes tied at the same time.
Another Libertarian speaks in favor of big government intervention on a woman's womb.... Y'all getting soft.
Libertarianism in Action: CN advocates for the use of the Non-Aggression Principle in dealing with the unborn.
You posted one paragraph from the advertisement.
It is a four page advertisement that explicitly states what it is looking for.
Don't you want to actually know what you are trying to argue here?
If not, keep stalling and deflecting and allowing yourself to be used.
Libertarian doctrine.
It's an advertisement that explicitly promises financial gain to clinics in return for body parts. I provided the relevant passage from it. You're deflecting, Dave.
Laws forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term fly in the face of the NAP, imho.
Which body part is explicitly mentioned?
That is relevant.
Tell everyone here what body part is explicitly mentioned. Prove to everyone you aren't hiding anything.
Sanctioning the murder of an unconsenting human is a bigger blow to the NAP.
I don't know of anyone who likes abortions.
I want you to rationalize the following:
If you really believe human beings are murdered by pregnant women then stand up and do more than you type. I want you to go to that woman (of any race and regardless of her drug background) and offer to raise that child and pay her for going through with something she does not wish to do.
I want YOU to do that right now and quit your blabbing. I don't like abortions. But I am not willing to tell a woman to have that kid AND take that child into my home. If you have carried out the aforementioned then I apologize and totally respect your stance. If not, then shut up until you act personally to solve a murder NOW.
That is all.
The way I see it, the rights of the individual end when they intrude on another persons rights. I see the unborn as innocent life with the right to live, that should not be considered as property to be discarded.
If that's what you see as "big government" then you are sadly mistaken.
No.
I have elaborated on this before. I would have abortion, at least after around 10 weeks to be a criminal act. I see it as senseless murder. I see the exchange of having the tubes tied for enabling the abortion as a method of insuring such crimes to humanity don't occur again by the same individual.
Libertarians do believe in justice you know...
You got that right. lol
There are plenty of people who are willing to adopt babies. Extremely few people are willing to adopt children who have already been influenced by others. I'm sure there are plenty who would pay for women to carry to term.
I've already raised two children and am close to retirement. I would gladly do as you request if I was younger, and couldn't have a child with my mate.
I take it this strikes close with you. Too ing bad.
Lol it's illegal, dumbass.
What if the woman's life is in danger at week 11, even if the baby is fine
Welp, since Clipper Nation pussed out and ran away, I will do what he is afraid to do.
http://www.centerformedicalprogress....ress-flyer.pdf
It is explicitly soliciting blood samples from mothers.
Not dead baby parts.
This is a reasonable exception to consider.
Most abortions, are birth control.
Irresponsibility that kills innocent life.
Anti-abortionists being mad for the sake of being mad. In the land of the free, shouldn't women be able to choose whether to give birth to a child that may have been conceived accidentally or against their will?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions