Reply With Quote
I would argue that the mutual hatred was more relevant against England than the Jews at this time in history.
Oh but it doesn't matter Egyptians think
What matters is what Israel and the US think about Egyptians.
I guess it's alright to kill thousands of Innocent Egyptians without proper judgment and investigation so long as they are suspected terrorist.
The fact of the matter is that, you have zero idea of what is happening in the region outside of what your western media told. Everything you Spew is Anti-Iran, the typical oh they're terrorist arguments..
The facts remain
Iran Never attaxked anyone in the last 200 years and you consider them them a danger
Sisi and his gangs overthrown a democratically elected government and killed thousands and thousands of Egyptians.
Open your eyes boy, not everything is black and white..I'm trying to genuinely help you here, not win an argument.
I would argue that the mutual hatred was more relevant against England than the Jews at this time in history.
this guys knows it.
The Muzzies hated the british...some independent turks and rebels in the middle east hated the british..thus joining adolf. Government wise, most of the aligned themselves with the Alied forces. While a group of Ottoman enthusiast, North African and Gulf rebels alied themselves with the the Nazies.
There was hardly any political tension between the Jews and the Muzzies in the 40's.
rigged? what do you work for fox news or something?
lol thisSisi has killed more eyptians in a shorter span than Morsi.
Americans
As an american and supporter of stability and order, it's most important to have as many U.S. allies (or at least countries who respect and are not hostile towards us) in the most volatile region in the world as possible. And I don't work for fox news, I'm an atheist and find their religious-based justifications of everything laughable.Oh but it doesn't matter Egyptians think
What matters is what Israel and the US think about Egyptians.
I guess it's alright to kill thousands of Innocent Egyptians without proper judgment and investigation so long as they are suspected terrorist.
The fact of the matter is that, you have zero idea of what is happening in the region outside of what your western media told. Everything you Spew is Anti-Iran, the typical oh they're terrorist arguments..
The facts remain
Iran Never attaxked anyone in the last 200 years and you consider them them a danger
Sisi and his gangs overthrown a democratically elected government and killed thousands and thousands of Egyptians.
Open your eyes boy, not everything is black and white..I'm trying to genuinely help you here, not win an argument.
The region was stable and peaceful before the west started to intervene. heck, the muzzies weren't even that involved in both World wars.
The Stability you speak of has caused millions of deaths in the middle east.
Saudi Arabia and Israel is key obviously for the US..If one of them collapses, it's going to be tough for the west to implement their laws in the Middle east.
This is quite wrong -- especially for WWI.
How would the muzzies even be that involved in ww1 or ww2? Outside of internal political grab, and mini tribal movements there was hardly anything that would resemble something similar to today's violence.
The Ottoman Empire was mostly Muslim. They lost over half a million soldiers.
That's being involved.
I mean seriously -- you and OP never heard of the Arab Revolt?
Lawrence of Arabia?
Jeez.
Wrong.
The Arabs fought with the British to overthrow the Ottoman Empire out of the entire middle east. The Ottoman Empire was fighting alongside Germany in WWI. So yes, Muslims had a huge role in that war. WWII wasn't quite so much.
This was my point in the earlier post. the Gulf allied themselves with the British...
I should have been more specific..
I am talking specifically about the muzzies of the gulf, north africa and centra asia. these are the same countries that are war torn now, that really had no significant role in WW1 and WW2..These are the same people that the OP and most westerners categorize as naturally violent because of religion.
I think most people are tolerant of turks as opposed to a North Africans.
This makes even less sense than your basketball takes tbh.
But those groups you are mentioning did have a big part of WWI since the Ottoman Turks were clearly aligned with the Germans. The British promised the Arabs their own country. One single country Arab nation, not the multi-countries we see today. That allowed the Turkish to get defeated and put more pressure on the Germans. Otherwise, the Turks would have had a larger role against the allied countries. The Arab uprising was a huge part of WWI.
And yes, Jihad would have existed even if the Germans were victorious. They would have used jihad against the Germans eventually just like they later used it against the Russians in Afghanistan.
getting rid of the jews doesnt solve even if the germans were defeated
the 1% will still control the world and continue with their shenanigans...
The Turkish Ottomites did (and most still do) practice(d) a much more liberal and less religious brand of Sunni Islam in comparison to the Arabs (including the North African Arabs/Berbers). They were primarily noted for premium coffee and designer furniture, not hijabs and quran thumpers. Even today the majority of Turks drink socially and party and have fun, ramadan is much more liberal in Turkey (and Muslim areas of extreme SE Europe) than in most Muslim countries -- think of an ordinary catholic and Lent; and salat prayer isn't practiced by hardly anyone there who isn't a devout clergyman. They were mostly on Germany/Austria's side for tactical and political reasons than anything else, religion had little to do with it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
