Reply With Quote
ruff ruff
That's what I said Fuzzy, very good.
ruff ruff
Counselor crayola claims to be an attorney. He sure does suck at argumentation though doesn't he?
I just imagine this coy petulant routine in actual action.
^ I wanted him to clarify what my "posting from last week was." Apparently that's too much to ask, so I just got snark.
If you say so, crayola. It's been laid out that you are incompetent or lying.
Your rant about how transexuals and the like is the downfall of society was adorable. Youre a really brave person.
This comes back to the incompetence versus coy thing I was talking about earlier. You have no credibility so who gives a frankly?
this may be something different.
maybe you don't think your dog is a dog.
lol the guy who's got half the forum on ignore talking about bravery
yeah because my motivation was fear.
you still haven't figured out the point of that or the fan club.
Is clambake a Chump alt?
Yes, clearly the mysteries of your corny attempts at insult humor are beyond meyeah because my motivation was fear.
Keep talking about bravery while cowering from half the forum.
Are you a Wild Cobra alt?
we're triplets. there's me, chump and cowboy.
boo is a stepbrother.
are you implying that dog owners bark?
You guys that don't mind your little daughters being perved on by grown men in a woman's locker room have something to cheer for today:
Seattle Parks and Recreation is facing a first-of-a-kind challenge to gender bathroom rules. A man undressed in a women's locker room, citing a new state rule that allows people to choose a bathroom based on gender iden y.
It was a busy time at Evans Pool around 5:30pm Monday February 8. The pool was open for lap swim. According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and took off his shirt. Women alerted staff, who told the man to leave, but he said "the law has changed and I have a right to be here."
"Really bizarre," MaryAnne Sato said. "I can't imagine why they would want to do that anyway!"
Sato uses the locker room a few times a week, but she says this is a first for her. It's also a first for Seattle Parks and Recreation. Employees report that the man made no verbal or physical attempt to identify as a woman, yet he still cited a new rule that allows bathroom choice based on gender identification.
The issue drew protesters from both sides to Olympia on Monday. Opponents claim the rule opens up bathrooms to voyeurs but supporters say that's an unrealistic fear.
No one was arrested in this case and police weren't called, even though the man returned a second time while young girls were changing for swim practice.
"Sort of works against the point they're trying to make. They're causing people to feel exposed and vulnerable with the intention of reducing people feeling exposed and vulnerable," said pool regular Aldan Shank.
The man's protest, if that's what it was, hurts the greater cause, Shank says.
As far as policy to protect everyone, Seattle Parks spokesman David Takami says they're still working on the issue. Right now, there's no specific protocol for how someone should demonstrate their gender in order to access a bathroom. Employees just rely on verbal identification or physical appearance, and this man offered neither.
"This didn’t seem like a transgender issue to staff – someone who was “identifying” as a woman," Takami wrote in a statement to KING 5. "We have guidelines that allow transgender individuals to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender iden y. We want everyone to feel comfortable in our facilities."
http://www.krem.com/news/local/north...-rule/45412534
So you prefer he be in the boys room perving on your little son instead? Yes or no, serious question
"RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The Latest on North Carolina lawmakers returning to work to address Charlotte's ordinance that lets transgender people choose men's and women's bathrooms according to the gender they identify with (all times local):
10:30 p.m.
North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory has signed legislation designed to rein in local governments passing their own anti-discrimination rules.
McCrory's office confirmed he signed the law late Wednesday night, hours after the legislature finalized the bill in a one-day work session.
Lawmakers returned to Raleigh because a Charlotte City Council ordinance was supposed to take effect April 1 that expanded protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender iden y for treatment at hotels and restaurants.
Critics focused on the ability of transgender people to use the bathroom or locker rooms aligned with their gender iden y. So did McCrory, Charlotte's mayor for 14 years.
The resulting legislation went further. Now cities, towns and counties can't pass anti-discrimination rules beyond a new state standard. And public schools, public college campuses and government agencies must require bathrooms or locker rooms be designated for use only by people based on their biological sex...."
http://news.yahoo.com/latest-lawmake...151345906.html
Let's make sure cities at the local level don't allow freak in public bathrooms!
Some dude with a wearing a dress shouldn't be allowed to go into the women's restroom.
Local control!
Small gubmit!
So you want dude in a dress next to you at the urinal. Noted.
I would think dude with a and a dress would prefer to squat?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
