Reply With Quote
It's public money..sharps have been pounding Dallas all week..
Sharps were all over Detroit, too, as I said earlier..
Seems like the money coming in now is on Carolina, they're back up to -2 on bovada. Not sure if it's public money or sharp money.
It's public money..sharps have been pounding Dallas all week..
Sharps were all over Detroit, too, as I said earlier..
Panthers win 31–21. It's a one score game early in the 4th but then Cam leads them on a loooong drive where they run the ball every down, move the chains every 3rd down and get in field goal range with little time left for the Cowboys to make a comeback. On the ensuing Cowboys possession, Romo throws a desperation heave down the field which becomes a pick and the Panthers are then able to go victory formation and kneel on it.
LMAO,,,,there were no sharps on Dallas.
Yep. . .Romo can't play on short weeks at all. His body needs time to recover. He couldn't see the field at all. Plus going against a great D, just a recipe for disaster.
Sharps were all over Dallas since the spread was released, actually..
Over 65+% of the public was on Carolina..
Wrong,,,this whole notion that Vegas is begging you to take Carolina as a dog and the sharps are on Dallas is ridiculous,,,first off sharps set their own lines and bet accordingly and every sharp I know,,,,me included,,took Panthers on the ML when getting +money.
I'm not a Cowboys fan, nor am I making it up, I'm telling you for a fact that there was a ton of sharp money on Detroit and Dallas today..
The line went from pk to -1 Dallas because of sharp money(Bob Scucci confirmed it, he's a bookmaker, as did several other linesmakers on Twitter), and then there was a huge influx of public money on Carolina that swung it the other way..
This was actually a really public game for Carolina..a 10-0 team getting points is an easy pick for the public, obviously..
I'm not a Cowboy/Carolina fan,,,I've just been gambling for 25+ years,,,
The line went from pk to -1 Dallas because of sharp money(Bob Scucci confirmed it, he's a bookmaker, as did several other linesmakers on Twitter), and then there was a huge influx of public money on Carolina that swung it the other way..
This was actually a really public game for Carolina..a 10-0 team getting points is an easy pick for the public, obviously..
Harlem,,,just for future info,just because there is a book maker that post on twitter means ,, Once again,,,sharps make their own lines and bet accordingly. Trust me on this and quit relying on some bookmaker on twitter,,,I don't care if he's a pro Vegas handicapper,,,he wont make you any money like you can if you learn it. I've beat bookmakers on mathematical theory many times,,,its systematic,,,no emotion involved believe it or not,,,
Yep, you were the stupid one that thought the Eagles could handle this "spot". They did not come to play.What trends? Detroit beat GB in a game where the Lions did everything they could to lose the game in the 4th quarter. Not to mention, Aaron Rodgers had one of his worst games of his career
The game was over by half time.
Perfect.
Just, perfect.
Why not look at the betting line little man, ok? Yep, it was a perfect 'spot" for a Carolina loss, that's why a 10-0 team was the underdog, ya reckon? Little man.....short week, on the road vs a team in a must win situation......now think just a little bit, ok? Little did we know Romo wasn't ready to play by Thursday.
Do you know anything at all about the game? Anything?
How did I know the Eagles would look so bad, well?
It had nothing to do with "the spot". The Eagles are a bad football team. It doesn't matter if they were playing on Thanksgiving, on the road, at home, On Monday, Thursday, Saturday or Sunday. They'll lose because they're a terribly coached team who's owner gave the head coach permission to gut the team of its talent. The Eagles are a dysfunctional organization.
I mean, Carolina played its first Thanksgiving Day game against the Cowboys and didn't have a problem with "the Spot" against a team accustomed to "the spot".
Most people did.
A Qb who has been on the shelf for so long, multiple severe injury history, quick second game back for a very sore 36 year old who was beaten up the game before and you bite on that? There was zero discussion from you on this very obvious problem. And you dare say you understand football? You are an idiot.
As far as the line, it's set so that the public will bet on each side of it. Do you get this dumbass? Vegas does not want 5 times as much money on one side of a line fathead. Vegas tries to get the vibe of the public, that's the art. So basically what you are admitting to is being no better than a headless toad at analyzing games and lines.
So newsflash, the public sometimes goes wildly against the set line (Rousey; Vegas took a hit) or they don't with a huge amount of money in play making Vegas at its most profitable; the middle man assuring lots money changes hands fairly with their cut for doing so. This is what Vegas does you dumb Fck. With sports gambling this IS THE PRIMARY FUNCTION.
Last edited by pgardn; 11-28-2015 at 12:12 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
