is that real?
Role player with a great shooting night of 7/20.
Reptilian confirmed.
How does Green not get T'd up for taunting every time he flexes/taunts after making a good play?
Because the Warriors have made people watch the NBA again. That's really it.
Or berating the officials to their face after every call.
afraid so haha. so weird man
yeah don't mention his 14 rebounds and 7 assists
If he was a Spurs how many Spurs fans would call him a system player ? smh
Yeah and I can't ever recall a superstar having a ty shooting percentage for the whole entire playoffs like he has at 42 percent. If anything it shows how ridiculously stacked the Warriors are when he can shoot poorly and they still win. I like to see Draymond have his typical crap shooting nights on an average team like the Hornets and see if they still win. He's a system player in my eyes because I don't see him excelling on any other team besides the Warriors. if he was a Spurs they probably lose the game with that type of shooting since our "superstar" Kawhi shot like crap the other night and you saw the results.
Last edited by daslicer; 05-04-2016 at 04:03 PM.
yet he has an ok TS% of .515... He has similar FG% and TS% than a guy like Westbrick but be my guest and call westbrick a role player... like FG% is the stuff to determine who is or who is not a superstar. So far he has excellent metrics with 11 rpg (with a size of 6'7), 7 apg (playing PF), 2 blks
For the rest I'm pretty sure he would be extremely fine with the Spurs.... and I've never called him a superstar but between superstar and mere role player overrated as , I'm sure there is someting in the middle.
Never been a fan of Westbrick. I agreed with Cuban's definition of a superstar when he applied it to Westbrook. Obviously Westbrook is a legit perennially all-star but I look at him as an inefficient high volume shooter that takes away from his team as evident in game 2 when he nearly shot the spurs back in the game. As much as I dislike Westbrook he would be an all-star player wherever he went. You put him on an average team and they make the leap and become better. Put him on a lottery team and they have a chance to be a playoff team.
He's the best big in the NBA, along with being the best leader, tbh..respect..
and this is that much different of Green... because ?
would not say he is the best big in the league tbh but he is among the best which is crazy when you consider dude is in fact a forward...
Well ElNono thread backfired. It has turned into a shrine for Raymond
And Pop would neuter him emotional so he would end up like Charles Smith.
He's neither. He's not even a true big; he's a pseudo one, who's able to get by as a full time one because of the way the game has evolved.
How a so called Spurs fan could call anyone not named Duncan (leadership doesn't decline) "the best leader", is beyond me.
bruh he was defending marc gasol 1 on 1 in last year's playoffs
Bruh, I never said he couldn't perform "big man" tasks and I know you're probably fooled by the burly physique and the beard, but Marc Gasol is one of the softest (and most overrated) players in the league.
Yet another closet Warriors fan, that I see in virtually every thread I click on about them, attempting to pass off your non stop slobbering as respect.
if i say draymond is a good player im a closet warriors fan
the only player i like on the team is curry, i've always been enamored with shooters. i was also a fan of nash, dirk, allen, stojakovic, arenas when they were relevant. just because i dont like them and i'm a spurs fan doesnt mean i have to pretend they're a team and that their players are scrubs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)