At this point I don't know if he is doing anything to help the team at all. He's completely invisible unless he's getting burned on D or bricking a shot.
Surprised more hasn't been made of Pop yelling at him towards the end of the game to give the ball to Kawhi on a couple possession and definately on the possession Kawhi hit the dagger.
He is really frustrating to watch. At this point I am ready for Murray to play, he can't possibly be any worse if he can just go out there and stay out of Kawhi and LA's way on offense and play decent defense.
Guys haven't made much of that bc they have been too busy ting on 23 year old 1 mill a year player Anderson, who is subbing in for Danny, who is doing exactly what you say... but he's been so exciting to have hot takes about that the Parker concerns are left to the few persevering souls like Gambit.
Noticed this during the highlights of yesterday's game, this look a little familiar to anyone?
Noticed this during the highlights of yesterday's game, this look a little familiar to anyone?
Noticed this during the highlights of yesterday's game, this look a little familiar to anyone?
This isn't even the play I was talking about. He did something similar early in the play Kawhi his his last shot.
Hahaha so not only are they now comparing a starter's advanced stats to a bench player's, they are doing it after 2 games! And the remaining salary bit was pretty much the cherry on top! I have to give them points for their creativity.
And yet we have a front office who has won a championship every 4 years who continues to start Tony. They must be really dumb or unaware of the amazing revelations on Spurstalk.
The only "no" that matters is PATFO, tbh.
Pop should give Parker every other game off, and about 15 minutes a game on the ones he does play.
well put. i agree, would rather see murray out there.
trade parker and gasol
at the half, everyone on the spurs has a positive +/-.
Only because he attempts like 1 ing 3 per game. All of them while being wide ing open, and most of those from the corners. We need a PG that can shoot 3s for real.
tonight: 2 points on 25% shooting, 4 assists, 3 turnovers in 22 minutes.
SPURS WIN!!!!!!
but TBH what is this magic about starting when Patty can get 10-20 pts from the bench? Why is this such an issue?
yeah, with parker on the bench. now read the le of this thread.
READ THE POLL RESULTS AGAIN LOSER!!!!!!
technically, being on the bench is still "with the spurs" FWIW
If you make that poll again now the option "yes" would win by 99,9%, tbh.
Correct, but OP keeps trying to re run the same take from January 2016. It's like groundhog day.
OP was correct in January and he's still correct now.
If we get rid of Patty next season to givre Parker a Ginobli/Kobe sendoff, I'm personally gonna email someone in the front office. Cuz that would be one of the dumbest moves in NBA history.
parker isn't doing anything for this team. his body language is the opposite of patty's.
this thread was made before:
-hater made one saying tp was going to be apart of the new big 3 http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256131
-harlem made one saying tp should be an all star http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256395
i wanted to trade parker while he had value to people that weren't me. who knows what help the spurs could've gotten for td's last year.
posters here talked MAD after i posted this thread. and the original post is respectable as
if you're reading and wanna see people get shut the up then just go through this thread.
i bumped this thread a lot because it was representative of parker's play.
even when parker had "good" games. ask my dabom:
Not a good time OP. Bump it when he plays bad. There's always a next time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
