Reply With Quote
MCW / Danny / Kawhi / Kyle / Aldridge would give problems to the warriors
MCW vid got me thinking. Patty, stash prospect, and first get a deal done for MCW? I know it's unrealistic but just tickle my fancy a little. He's the big guard we need against the warriors. Wonder what chip could do with him in a season. Could play both guard spots. Just interesting is all.
MCW / Danny / Kawhi / Kyle / Aldridge would give problems to the warriors
lmao
Who is kyle?
I thought you all said Duncan was the missing piece and reason for the 30 point loss??
MCW would kill kawhi and Aldridge offense. He cant ing shoot.
Trading Patty for another non-shooter is going to be an issue besides the Bucks have Bayless who's a bigger version of Patty. If they have any interest in any of the Spurs bench players then it's Kyle b/c he's lanky & Kidd probably is intrigued by the possibility of playing him as a point-forward. MCW is basically a hybrid of Kyle/Simmons.
MCW would be playing the Fathead/Simmons/CoJo role.
Yeah, MCW is intriguing but we need at least one of our young wings to break out as outside threat before thinking about trading for him & inserting him into our rotation.
Clippers would have to be idiots.
If I'm LA, Id offer DJ and Wes Johnson for Jokic & Gallo though.
Doubt the Spurs do anything.....Maybe pick up someone off waivers but that's about it.....
Because he has no special skills. He is a blue collar guy who is ok at everything but doesn't have a special strength. Better trade him before everybody notices he has a low upside...
I like him though because he isn't a liability, you can go to war with him.
Thought he was decent the bit I saw for team France last summer. Would we get anything better with a late first in this draft (projected to be weak)? Plus Spurs need to start bringing in players from the pipeline next summer, LJC, Bertans, Multinov
Seriously if I am the bucks I beg Rc to do it. In a rebuilding team they would play Kyle like he was meant to and let them go back to their defensive roots of causing deflections last season, plus using forwards as PG (Kidd tried that with antetoukoumpo) and Kyle is the same age/development stage as their other youngsters. If I am Kidd what is another trade in the big scheme??? Kyle could help that team.
For our team, I don't think Pop swings that trade though.
Yes, we could get somebody in the late first round who is more likely to help us than Laugergne, with his low ceiling, or any of those guys in the "pipeline". None of those guys is likely to be with the Spurs next season. LJC is not likely to ever become skilled enough to play in the NBA. Bertans' knees may not be as good as Tim's, so he is unlikely to ever make it. Milutinov is a physically underdeveloped backup in Greece and will certainly not be coming over next season. The player we have in the pipeline who has the best chance to make it to San Antonio is probably Cady Lalanne. He was raw in Summer League last summer, but he is becoming a good stretch-4 for the Austin Spurs.
In your earlier post, I thought you were in favor of a trade for MCW because he could post-up...?
Yeah but how are you going to get spacing for post-ups when Simmons/Kyle are spreading the floor?
I don't want anything to do with MCW - like I said earlier, acquiring him just means more job security for Chip Engelland.Yeah but how are you going to get spacing for post-ups when Simmons/Kyle are spreading the floor?
NO I don't like him.. bc he has no BBIQ. I think Kyle in the bucks would be awesome though. I'd watch that team. RC I don't think trades Kyle though.
MCW is Simmons w/ better handles & a postup game which is a better matchup against teams w/ athletes on the perimeter (Worriers/OKC/Cavs) than Fathead. The guy almost had a quadruple double w/ 9 steals in his NBA debut. He would be playing the Shumpert role on the Spurs.
Spurs have the Trade exception they got from moving Splitter ($ 8 million) they would have to clear a roster spot. Bonner can't be traded without his permission, i believe Butler is in the same boat, McCullum was already traded from the Kings. They could just release Butler and take on Beli's deal, if i'm not mistaken.
Beli's had a net Rtg of +6 in his two seasons here (Offensive rating minus defensive rating=net rating) the though that his defense was more a liability than his offense was an asset is wrong. He also shot a ridiculous 40.5 % from 3. Spurs could use another shooter, they are a top 5 team in terms of 3pt % but are only 26th in attempts. In other words, they are a high percentage, low volume 3pt shooting team. Some of thatch by design but some of that's having perimeter players that are mediocre 3pt shooters (Parker, Anderson, Simmons, McCullum).
The bigger question would be were would his minutes come from. He backed up KL last year and Leonard figures to play around 36 mpg this PS. Would he be worth it for 12 or so mpg.
No. It was renounced. Spurs can only sign minimum players if they open a roster spot.
I think the Splitter trade exception went away when the team went under the cap to sign Lamarcus. Even if they have a trade exception, I'd want to use it on someone a of a lot better than Marco.
When the team was dealing with injuries (Danny/Manu/Kawhi/Tony) back in 2013-14 PATFO tried to acquire Evan Turner from the Sixers b/c he used to play well against the Heat, this year it's going to be Michael Carter-Williams b/c of how he performed against the Worriers.
Marco is unplayable against the Worriers/OKC.
You're mistaken.
Probably not because the guy is "seasoned", he is more reliable immediately.
But if you think upside, long-term... You take another direction imo
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
