Could be waiting for the playoffs to employ it.
And some teams won't do it on principle. It is pussy & chicken .
-Draymond: 136-204 (66.7%)
-Iggy: 42-67 (62.7%)
-Ezeli: 66-124 (53.2%)
-Bogut: 12-33 (36.4%)
If Curry is in video game mode then I'm hacking Bogut/Ezeli every time down the floor especially if there is a big Barnes can't guard (i.e. Timmay) or Draymond is in foul trouble. Plus, I'm hacking Iggy/Draymond on fastbreaks instead of giving them a layup or transition 3.
I do remember Pop hacking Bogut in the 2013 series so Timmay can feast on David Lee: http://hangtime.blogs.nba.com/2013/0...ling-to-spurs/
The Cavs also hacked Iggy in the Finals but it was too little to late: http://zonazealots.com/2015/06/15/cl...ove-hack-iggy/
I won't put it past Pop to resort to hacking in close games considering his recent history.
Last edited by Kawhitstorm; 02-09-2016 at 01:29 PM.
Could be waiting for the playoffs to employ it.
And some teams won't do it on principle. It is pussy & chicken .
So that's why Silver is all of a sudden ready to get rid of the intentional fouls.
Nope, NBA players should be embarrassed for not being able to shoot better than a 10 yr old girl. Is it pussy & chicken when player are dared to make 3s or jumpers like LeBron in the 2013 Finals?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)